https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104377
--- Comment #4 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #2)
> (In reply to Feng Xue from comment #1)
> >
> > OK. I does missed something. Here we could not hold assumption that
> > ipcp_decision_stage() only sees raw cgraph nod
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: syq at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-12&arch=mips64el&ver=12-20220214-1&stamp=1644848228&raw=0
The segment is from:
gcc/d/dmd/ctfeexpr.d:
UnionExp changeArrayLiteral
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104538
--- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su ---
This problem happens only for the new gdc code introduced in gcc-12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465
Randy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Randy at miningrigrentals dot
com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539
Bug ID: 104539
Summary: Failed to inline a very simple template function when
it's explicit instantiated.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104539
--- Comment #1 from Cassio Neri ---
Sorry, the last snippet above should be
template
inline
int f() {
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102513
--- Comment #10 from Feng Xue ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #8)
> I am about to thest the following patch. In longer-run, it would be better
> to never generate lattice values outside of the value_range but there is an
> ordering
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f
commit r12-7236-g2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f
commit r12-7236-g2c3309e3d0f5cb8f298f7604848d115f0992e04f
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-7228-20220214143106-g0a1a3afb5fb-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220214 (experimental) (GCC)
ompression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.1 20220214 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104542
Bug ID: 104542
Summary: make_obj_using_allocator and
uninitialized_construct_using_allocator lack constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104059
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96864
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12 by r12-6756-g8bc700f4c3fbe405413db02281ef2918bfa831fc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96864
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 96864, which changed state.
Bug 96864 Summary: loop not vectorized due AVX512 condition handling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96864
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543
Bug ID: 104543
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
>From Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/s1WW4snzM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104544
Bug ID: 104544
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure
(length) w/ -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compare-debug-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103627
--- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha ---
Should this PR be closed, or are there backports pending?
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
