https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60749
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97747
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97747
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104391
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104386
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm:
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/108
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104392
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang rejects this too:
:9:12: error: argument to 'operator<=>' cannot be narrowed from type
'unsigned int' to 'int'
return left.a <=> right.a;
^
:9:23: error: argument to 'operator<=>' cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104392
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I think there are two code spots whose pitfalls resulted in the PR.
The first one is in rs6000.cc::legitimate_lo_sum_address_p which permits wrong
pic low-sum address.
Another one is in lra-constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104388
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104389
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
Not this bug, but note that the comment and the code don't match in this
transformation: "a negative value" becomes !tree_expr_maybe_real_minus_zero_p
(@0) which is quite different. I am not sure the path with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83264
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin21
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104393
Bug ID: 104393
Summary: incorrect results with elemental functions of scalar
derived types with allocatable components
Product: gcc
Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11)
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104393
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104385
--- Comment #2 from P.A. Wacrenier ---
Sorry, as a matter of fact it does not (always) work on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Utilisation des specs internes.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/autofs/unityaccount/ens/gcc/gcc_10.2.0/bin/../libexec/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104385
--- Comment #3 from P.A. Wacrenier ---
gdb output (x86_64 linux)
Thread 22 "a.out" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffedd10700 (LWP 1363311)]
priority_list_downgrade_task (child_task=0x7fffecc0, list=0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104385
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can't get it to fail for me on x86_64-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebf6175464768983a2d8c82c2d47771ee89192b8
commit r12-7062-gebf6175464768983a2d8c82c2d47771ee89192b8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104385
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104394
Bug ID: 104394
Summary: Failure to optimize vector pattern for x < 0
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-05
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
--- Comment #30 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to pc from comment #27)
> There was a commit related to this bug, but it is still in ASSIGNED state,
> so I'm not sure if this was to be considered "fixed", but...
>
> Chip discovered that, with a bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104391
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
Bug ID: 104395
Summary: alignof is a C++11 feature.
src/c++98/bitmap_allocator.cc???
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
/home/cqwrteur/myhome/gcc_build/native/wasm32-wasi/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:274:16:
error: '_Tp' does not refer to a value
if (alignof(_Tp) > __STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
also in all xxx_allocator.h including mt_allocator.h pool_allocator.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104300
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:119cea98f664764cce04963243c39c8f6d797d33
commit r12-7069-g119cea98f664764cce04963243c39c8f6d797d33
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92385
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:119cea98f664764cce04963243c39c8f6d797d33
commit r12-7069-g119cea98f664764cce04963243c39c8f6d797d33
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104395
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC's option is -faligned-new -fsized-deallocation -std=c++98
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
