https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This also causes a lot of packages to fail to build with undefined references
to the libatomic libcalls.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104324
--- Comment #3 from gcc-v850-bugs at engineer dot com ---
Thanks for the response! I just managed to build gcc 4.9.2 (using binutils
2.25) and the issue is still present, which is obvious with your input. I will
look in the binutils direction ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95115
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c9494533a78df07f2b32097fe1e78f68369dc94
commit r10-10432-g9c9494533a78df07f2b32097fe1e78f68369dc94
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104341
Bug ID: 104341
Summary: Bogus -Werror=array-bounds since
r12-2582-gb9cbf8c9e0bc72f5
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I think the proper fix is reversion of the commit.
What do you think Nathan?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104329
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104289
--- Comment #2 from eric.pouech at orange dot fr ---
Thx for looking into it.
For sake of completeness, clang supports it flawlessly.
[eric]$ clang -fdiagnostics-parseable-fixits -c b2.c
b2.c:9:28: warning: format specifies type 'int' but the ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
rdapp at linux dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at linux dot ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #4 from Mart
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104335
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-02
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
If there is a way to test adding -fno-ipa-modref to the bootstrap. That or
-fno-tree-vectorize. I suspect it is one of those two since those were the
areas that changed the most for the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, in the debugger the difference is in the range_operator::wi_fold_in_parts
function (with:
enum class A { A0, A1, A2, A3 };
int x;
void baz ();
struct B {
unsigned b : 2;
A
foo () const
{
r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55d83cdf23b5f284b4e0bd0a6d1af3d947b2e7c3
commit r12-6993-g55d83cdf23b5f284b4e0bd0a6d1af3d947b2e7c3
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55d83cdf23b5f284b4e0bd0a6d1af3d947b2e7c3
commit r12-6993-g55d83cdf23b5f284b4e0bd0a6d1af3d947b2e7c3
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab95fe61fea38fbac7f4e00abd32c2530532351a
commit r12-6994-gab95fe61fea38fbac7f4e00abd32c2530532351a
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab95fe61fea38fbac7f4e00abd32c2530532351a
commit r12-6994-gab95fe61fea38fbac7f4e00abd32c2530532351a
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f6f411f63f3aceddd846e4b0d27202a6e13d42c
commit r12-6995-g9f6f411f63f3aceddd846e4b0d27202a6e13d42c
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f6f411f63f3aceddd846e4b0d27202a6e13d42c
commit r12-6995-g9f6f411f63f3aceddd846e4b0d27202a6e13d42c
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
|IF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94372
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stafford Horne :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cac2f69cdad434ad5cb60f5fe931d45cd82ef476
commit r12-6996-gcac2f69cdad434ad5cb60f5fe931d45cd82ef476
Author: Bernd Kuhls
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94372
Stafford Horne changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104327
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
So target specific option mismatch is caused by:
static const struct default_options s390_option_optimization_table[] =
{
...
/* Use MVCLE instructions to decrease code size if requested. */
{ OPT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Now verified, in the LTO case both wi::gt_p/wi::gtu_p and wi::lt_p/wi::ltu_p
are inlined and do:
0x0191600e
<_ZNK14range_operator16wi_fold_in_partsER6irangeP9tree_nodeRK16generic_wide_intI16wide_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104342
Bug ID: 104342
Summary: ICE with -gnata -fcallgraph-info=su
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100428
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> The difference might be in:
> 1938/* Optimize comparisons with constants. */
> 1939if (STATIC_CONSTANT_P (yi.len == 1 && yi.val[0] >= 0))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
This testcase should be passing since commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e0451f93d9faa13495132f4e246e9bef30b51417
([nvptx] Add some support for .local atomics).
It's possible that we'll put
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100678
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
>
> --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
> ---
> (In reply to Jakub Jel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> And another question is, the 2, 3, 4 cases handling seems like an
> optimization, > so wi_fold at line 192 should give the right answer, but it
> doesn't.
Actually no, I misunderstood, with -O0 or non-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] Ranger/dom |[12 Regression] Ranger/dom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I think one way is to punt on these small precision types, like:
--- range-op.cc.jj1 2022-01-13 22:29:15.345831749 +0100
+++ range-op.cc 2022-02-02 13:44:05.813637820 +0100
@@ -148,11 +148,13 @@ ran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
I can just confirm that using tree-vrp.o from stage1 fixes the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343
Bug ID: 104343
Summary: Too many arguments error reported for a
variadic-argument function if std::endl is passed
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> So, I think one way is to punt on these small precision types, like:
> --- range-op.cc.jj1 2022-01-13 22:29:15.345831749 +0100
> +++ range-op.cc 2022-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20220202/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-multiarch --with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think to_widest only works with INTEGER_CSTs, to do the comparisons (or have
?h_range be widest_int), we'd need to use widest_int::from I think.
Anyway, with the above patch I've built so far stage2 cc1p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95115
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Should be fixed in trunk, and gcc-10 & 11 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
Bug ID: 104345
Summary: nvptx: "regression" after "nvptx: Transition nvptx
backend to STORE_FLAG_VALUE = 1"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52329
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52329&action=edit
gcc12-pr104334.patch
Patch doing ?h_range and related comparisons in widest_int.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104344
--- Comment #2 from Charles Nicholson ---
For whatever it's worth, clang does recognize both forms and emit optimal
assembly at -Os:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/sehxYb97E
cast_through_char_unrolled: # @cast_through_char_unrolled
movd eax, xmm0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104345
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104344
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Charles Nicholson from comment #2)
> For whatever it's worth, clang does recognize both forms and emit optimal
> assembly at -Os:
>
> https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/sehxYb97E
>
> cast_through_char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104270
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b4eee5fd158c4ee75d1f1000debbf5082fb9b56
commit r12-6997-g9b4eee5fd158c4ee75d1f1000debbf5082fb9b56
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104270
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a92e46c0e9a75cd14125493b8826d3e33dd0f67
commit r12-7002-g9a92e46c0e9a75cd14125493b8826d3e33dd0f67
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104334
--- Comment #20 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
> Created attachment 52329 [details]
> gcc12-pr104334.patch
>
> Patch doing ?h_range and related comparisons in widest_int.
Looks like a good app
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb812e0417adc20cac72986df3bf422ed007743c
commit r11-9533-gfb812e0417adc20cac72986df3bf422ed007743c
Author: Martin Liska
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104333
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104255
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
>
> >
> > error: use of parameter outside function body before ‘)’ token
> >
> > due to 'e' being used outside o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104328
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The first 2 testcases can be fixed with
--- openmp.cc.jj2 2022-01-21 11:01:12.458449420 +0100
+++ openmp.cc 2022-02-02 16:21:36.813563894 +0100
@@ -7757,6 +7757,7 @@ resolve_omp_atomic (gfc_code *cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84052
Jordan Beaubien changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mivicaf210 at mxclip dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104346
Bug ID: 104346
Summary: Problem with overloaded assignment when LHS is
allocatable array
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104347
Bug ID: 104347
Summary: internal compiler error- default template arguments -
missing angle brackets
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Your code is invalid. std::endl is an overloaded function, so you can't pass it
as an argument like that. The template argument cannot be deduced.
GCC's error could be improved though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104348
Bug ID: 104348
Summary: Incorrect sorting in constexpr constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104346
--- Comment #1 from Vivek Rao ---
It is explained at
https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/Problem-with-overloaded-assignment-when-LHS-is-allocatable-array/m-p/1356757/highlight/true#M159812
that the code is not conforming, so th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104348
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99859
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asorenji at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Further reduced:
void endl(char);
void endl(wchar_t);
template inline void Sprint(Args&&...) { }
int main()
{
Sprint("B: off=", 2, " now=", 3, endl);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104343
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Clang gives:
x.C:11:3: error: no matching function for call to 'Sprint'
Sprint("B: off=", 2, " now=", 3, endl);
^~
x.C:5:13: note: candidate template ignored: substitution failure: deduced
incompl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104079
--- Comment #7 from Martin Turski ---
ETA?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104349
Bug ID: 104349
Summary: ICE in (tree_to_uhwi) gfc_conv_array_initializer, at
fortran/trans-array.cc:6337
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104350
Bug ID: 104350
Summary: ICE in gfc_array_dimen_size(): Bad dimension
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351
Bug ID: 104351
Summary: ICE in gfc_generate_initializer, at
fortran/expr.cc:5140
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104351
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104352
Bug ID: 104352
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_anyall, at
fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc:4481 (etc.)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104352
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104076
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Unlike the false positive -Wuse-after-free in pr104232, the instance of
-Wdangling-pointer in this case (a PHI argument) is intentional so that we
diagnose problems like those in the request for it (pr63272),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104090
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Sebastian Huber
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cb53c10831be59d967d9dce8e7980fee4703500
commit r11-9534-g3cb53c10831be59d967d9dce8e7980fee4703500
Author: Sebastian Hub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104328
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104353
Bug ID: 104353
Summary: ppc64le: Apparent reliance on undefined behavior of
xvcvdpsxws
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
URL: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/20964#i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104328
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52332
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52332&action=edit
gcc12-pr104328.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4aa5a3e95ba106f3149157a0278616f7a5fd192
commit r11-9535-gf4aa5a3e95ba106f3149157a0278616f7a5fd192
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:323e72a83d417b230c2d93455fa09a4b66614c2a
commit r10-10433-g323e72a83d417b230c2d93455fa09a4b66614c2a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104331
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354
Bug ID: 104354
Summary: ICE with Partition_Elaboration_Policy (Sequential)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104355
Bug ID: 104355
Summary: Misleading -Warray-bounds documentation says "always
out of bounds"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104354
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Created attachment 52334
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52334&action=edit
GCC 12-compatible RTS
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
