[Bug tree-optimization/104203] [12 Regressions] huge compile-time regression in pointer_query since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- I can confirm the issue is fixed for all three cases I saw it. Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug target/104250] [i386] GCC may want to use 32-bit (I)DIV if it can for 64-bit operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104250 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu --- 1703 : 401cb1: vmovq %xmm1,%r9 (*) 834 : 401cb6: vmovq %r8,%xmm1 1719 : 401cbb: vmovq %r9,%xmm0 (*) Look like %r9 is dead after the second (*), and it can be optimized to 1703 :

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > So w/ -Ofast -march=znver2 I get a runtime of 130 seconds, when I add > -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_moves_from_vec,^inter_unit_moves_to_vec then > this improves to 1

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > So w/ -Ofast -march=znver2 I get a runtime of 130 seconds, when I add > -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_moves_from_vec,^inter_unit_moves_to_vec then > this improves t

[Bug libstdc++/104161] Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I have a new ctor for directory_iterator that takes the FD and does all operations relative to that.

[Bug c++/104243] Optimization requires __sync_synchronize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to A. Klitzing from comment #5) > Created attachment 52294 [details] > assembler output > > By the way... If idx is not initialized it will work, too. > > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > int main(int argc, cha

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- One possible improvement can be promoting the option when an ICE happens: $ g++ pr100019.C -c -w pr100019.C: In instantiation of ‘void f(auto:1 ...) [with auto:1 = {int}]’: pr100019.C:8:4: required from he

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Let's compare it with Clang: clang++ llvm.C -std=c++20 PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. Stack dump: 0.

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #10) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > > So w/ -Ofast -march=znver2 I get a runtime of 130 seconds, when I add > > -mtune-ctrl=^inter_unit_moves_from_ve

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #10 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- > Created attachment 52297 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52297&action=edit > Tentative patch [...] > A ful

[Bug tree-optimization/104196] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104196 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82c8ff79d06cc7d389c72f94d4443c509cf85313 commit r12-6888-g82c8ff79d06cc7d389c72f94d4443c509cf85313 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

> > According to znver2_cost > > > > Cost of sse_to_integer is a little bit less than fp_store, maybe increase > > sse_to_integer cost(more than fp_store) can helps RA to choose memory > > instead of GPR. > > That sounds reasonable - GPR<->xmm is cheaper than GPR -> stack -> xmm > but GPR<->xmm s

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #13 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > > According to znver2_cost > > > > Cost of sse_to_integer is a little bit less than fp_store, maybe increase > > sse_to_integer cost(more than fp_store) can helps RA to choose memory > >

[Bug testsuite/104201] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-27 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9) > 1703 : 401cb1: vmovq %xmm1,%r9 (*) > 834 : 401cb6: vmovq %r8,%xmm1 > 1719 : 401cbb: vmovq %r9,%xmm0 (*) > > Look like %r9 is dead afte

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 52300 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52300&action=edit LBM_performStreamCollide testcase This is the relevant function.

[Bug tree-optimization/104196] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104196 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #16 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > > Yep, we also have code like > > - movabsq $0x3ff03db8fde2ef4e, %r8 > ... > - vmovq %r8, %xmm11 It is loading random constant to xmm11. Since reg<->xmm moves are relativ

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- So in .reload we have (with unpatched trunk) 401: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 6 462: ax:DF=[`*.LC0'] REG_EQUAL 9.8506899724167309977929107844829559326171875e-1 407: xmm2:DF=ax:DF 463: ax:D

[Bug testsuite/104201] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104201 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e4bf373f2ae97be3adc654054e7e8a982813766 commit r12-6889-g2e4bf373f2ae97be3adc654054e7e8a982813766 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Th

[Bug testsuite/104201] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/103642] [12 Regression] ICE in lower_omp_target: omp-low.c:12977 (fold_convert_loc) for omp target map(from: t.s->a[:N]) since r12-5835-g0ab29cf0bb68960c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103642 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Chung-Lin Tang : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c91b014923f418e0aab789c5cf57facf04bf266 commit r12-6890-g1c91b014923f418e0aab789c5cf57facf04bf266 Author: Chung-Lin Tang Date:

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Fedora/RHEL gcc also has > sed -i -e 's/Common Driver Var(flag_report_bug)/& Init(1)/' gcc/common.opt > and thus makes -freport-bug the default. Speaking with Ri

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- One more comment about https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/. Well, I think the page contains very detailed information for reporters, and I double anybody is actually reading that. Plus it misses a direct link to bugzil

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Note at Marvell we also turn it on by default a configure option is not needed either. The main reason why I filed this was because of two bug reports that came in where the user of GCC did not attach the pr

[Bug target/104239] [12 Regression] immintrin.h or x86gprintrin.h headers can't be included

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104199] [12 Regression] g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_5.C and g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_6.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also|

[Bug target/104257] New: rs6000/*intrin.h headers using non-uglified automatic variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104257 Bug ID: 104257 Summary: rs6000/*intrin.h headers using non-uglified automatic variables Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/103702] [12 Regression] ICE in update_target_cost_per_stmt, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:5457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103702 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2022be54daf638885e1e685afd36619cb4b01a93 commit r12-6891-g2022be54daf638885e1e685afd36619cb4b01a93 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Thu Jan 2

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- For the case of LBM what also helps is disabling PRE or using PGO (which sees the useless PRE) given that the path the expressions become partially compile-time computable is never taken at runtime. In th

[Bug target/103702] [12 Regression] ICE in update_target_cost_per_stmt, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:5457

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103702 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 > > --- Comment #13 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > > > According to z

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 > > --- Comment #16 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > > > > Yep, we als

[Bug c++/104245] abseil-cpp 20211102.0 fails with "internal compiler error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug analyzer/104247] Compiler warnings on 32-bit system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104247 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3989337e1e1e334bb6d6db5d441c751d0b9ae2e1 commit r12-6892-g3989337e1e1e334bb6d6db5d441c751d0b9ae2e1 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug analyzer/104247] Compiler warnings on 32-bit system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104247 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/104258] New: [11/12 regression] Generic formal ">" used incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258 Bug ID: 104258 Summary: [11/12 regression] Generic formal ">" used incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

> I would say so. It saves code size and also uop space unless the two > can magically fuse to a immediate to %xmm move (I doubt that). I made simple benchmark double a=10; int main() { long int i; double sum,val1,val2,val3,val4; for (i=0;i<10;i++) { #if

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #21 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > I would say so. It saves code size and also uop space unless the two > can magically fuse to a immediate to %xmm move (I doubt that). I made simple benchmark double a=10; int main() {

[Bug web/104254] -freport-bug should be mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104254 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76ef38e3178a11e76a66b4d4c0e10e85fe186a45 commit r12-6893-g76ef38e3178a11e76a66b4d4c0e10e85fe186a45 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug ada/104258] [11/12 regression] Generic formal ">" used incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Priority|P3

[Bug target/94193] powerpc: Provide fegetround/feraiseexcept/feclearexcept builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94193 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104241] [12 Regression] trunk 20220126 RTL error on powerpc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104241 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/104245] abseil-cpp 20211102.0 fails with "internal compiler error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- [...] > I've now successfully completed a sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap > (sparc-sun-solaris2.11 for

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c0f453c4af4880c522c8472c33eef42bee9eda1 commit r12-6894-g0c0f453c4af4880c522c8472c33eef42bee9eda1 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug c++/101988] [12 Regression] Accepts invalid new-expression of array of deduced class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101988 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104259] New: libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104259 Bug ID: 104259 Summary: libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug c++/104259] libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104259 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 52302 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52302&action=edit Build log

[Bug analyzer/104247] Compiler warnings on 32-bit system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104247 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Thanks!

[Bug c++/104259] libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104259 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Likely started with r12-6866-gc8bd4dc8212e43b2f9af08b80df97f90cdb0df4f.

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- Is

[Bug libstdc++/104259] libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104259 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-27 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/104260] New: [12 Regression] Misplaced waccess3 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Bug ID: 104260 Summary: [12 Regression] Misplaced waccess3 pass Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-e

[Bug middle-end/104260] [12 Regression] Misplaced waccess3 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug middle-end/104260] [12 Regression] Misplaced waccess3 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #23 from Richard Biene

[Bug libstdc++/104259] libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104259 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14f339894db6ca7fe4772d5528c726694d2517c4 commit r12-6895-g14f339894db6ca7fe4772d5528c726694d2517c4 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug libstdc++/104259] libstdc++ fails for epiphany-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104259 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/104258] [11/12 regression] operator preference rule not applied in instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-27 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug lto/104237] [11/12 Regression] Emitted binary code changes when -g is enabled at -O1 -flto and optimize attribute since r11-3126-ga8f9b4c54cc35062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ada/104258] [11/12 regression] operator preference rule not applied in instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou a

[Bug c++/104245] [12 Regression] abseil-cpp 20211102.0 fails with "internal compiler error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245 --- Comment #7 from Tomasz Kłoczko --- Created attachment 52303 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52303&action=edit flag_test.cc.o.gz gzipped file generated by /usr/bin/g++ -save-temps -DGTEST_LINKED_AS_SHARED_LIBRARY=1 -I/h

[Bug c++/104245] [12 Regression] abseil-cpp 20211102.0 fails with "internal compiler error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/104189] enable 64-bit compare-and-swap on SPARC/Linux with V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189 --- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- FWIW, I also asked David Miller regarding the register preservation and here is his answer: > The full 64-bit registers of the out and global registers are saved at trap > time. > But only 32-b

[Bug c++/103678] [concepts] Constrained partial specialization of dependent template conflicts with unconstrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103678 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce6054a22ae14594a2919d2ad87cd9478e616fb3 commit r12-6896-gce6054a22ae14594a2919d2ad87cd9478e616fb3 Author: Patrick Palka Date: T

[Bug c++/92944] [concepts] redefinition error when using constrained structure template inside namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce6054a22ae14594a2919d2ad87cd9478e616fb3 commit r12-6896-gce6054a22ae14594a2919d2ad87cd9478e616fb3 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/99895] Function parameters generated wrong in call to member of non-type template parameter in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99895 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dec8d0e5fa00ceb2ded78b8a3eba8976d860a90e commit r12-6897-gdec8d0e5fa00ceb2ded78b8a3eba8976d860a90e Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/99895] Function parameters generated wrong in call to member of non-type template parameter in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99895 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/92944] [concepts] redefinition error when using constrained structure template inside namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 92944, which changed state. Bug 92944 Summary: [concepts] redefinition error when using constrained structure template inside namespace https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944 What|Removed

[Bug c++/103678] [concepts] Constrained partial specialization of dependent template conflicts with unconstrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103678 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 103678, which changed state. Bug 103678 Summary: [concepts] Constrained partial specialization of dependent template conflicts with unconstrained partial specialization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103678

[Bug lto/104237] [11/12 Regression] Emitted binary code changes when -g is enabled at -O1 -flto and optimize attribute since r11-3126-ga8f9b4c54cc35062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, as this is lto1, all the locations are created by lto_location_cache::apply_location_cache. With -g lto1 can stream more locations than with -g0, and apply_location_cache is always called on some chunk o

[Bug middle-end/104260] [12 Regression] Misplaced waccess3 pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104260 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #24 from Hongtao.liu --- for vmovq %rdi, %xmm7 # 503 [c=4 l=4] *movdf_internal/21 .. vmulsd %xmm7, %xmm4, %xmm5 # 320 [c=12 l=4] *fop_df_comm/2 .. movabsq $0x3fef85af6c69b5a6, %rdi # 409 [c=5 l=10] *

[Bug rtl-optimization/102178] [12 Regression] SPECFP 2006 470.lbm regressions on AMD Zen CPUs after r12-897-gde56f95afaaa22

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178 --- Comment #25 from Hongtao.liu --- > Guess we need to let RA know mem cost is cheaper than GPR for r249. Reduce sse_store cost?

[Bug c++/104243] Optimization requires __sync_synchronize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243 --- Comment #7 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Anyway, upstream removed the pure attribute as we suggested: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/392357 Can we be assured the pure attribute will

[Bug target/104261] New: gcc uses fildq and fistpq on unaligned addesss for atomic accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104261 Bug ID: 104261 Summary: gcc uses fildq and fistpq on unaligned addesss for atomic accesses Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101894] [11/12 Regression] ICE with multiple friend declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101894 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/104243] Optimization requires __sync_synchronize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug ipa/103171] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2523-g13586172d0b70c9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/104251] std::reduce scrambles argument order for BinaryOp function call: Possible bug?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104251 --- Comment #5 from Felix Köhler --- Andrew, Jonathan, thanks to both of you for the concise and helpful explanations! GCC not only is a great compiler, it has a great STL and great implementers :D So, if I want to replace an instance of accum

[Bug sanitizer/104262] New: -fsanitize=address false alarm with aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104262 Bug ID: 104262 Summary: -fsanitize=address false alarm with aligned_alloc Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug sanitizer/104262] -fsanitize=address false alarm with aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104262 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Why do you think it conforms to C11? "The value of alignment shall be a valid alignment supported by the implementation and the value of size shall be an integral multiple of alignment." If this is x

[Bug lto/104237] [11/12 Regression] Emitted binary code changes when -g is enabled at -O1 -flto and optimize attribute since r11-3126-ga8f9b4c54cc35062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/104237] [11/12 Regression] Emitted binary code changes when -g is enabled at -O1 -flto and optimize attribute since r11-3126-ga8f9b4c54cc35062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3

[Bug sanitizer/104262] -fsanitize=address false alarm with aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104262 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug lto/104237] [11/12 Regression] Emitted binary code changes when -g is enabled at -O1 -flto and optimize attribute since r11-3126-ga8f9b4c54cc35062

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- FWIW years ago I posted a patch to generalize libgccjit's location consolidation code so that it could be used by LTO, but IIRC it was rejected. I spent a few minutes looking in the archives but wasn't able

[Bug sanitizer/104262] -fsanitize=address false alarm with aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104262 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See DR#460. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2396.htm#dr_460

[Bug sanitizer/104262] -fsanitize=address false alarm with aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104262 --- Comment #4 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu --- Thanks for looking into the problem. DR#460 says that the C2x committee adopted wording based on N2072, which which made the point that non-integral multiples of alignment are useful - for the sam

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7eb61a45a171d4f8f5bf4d4f469d42e657c69a6a commit r12-6900-g7eb61a45a171d4f8f5bf4d4f469d42e657c69a6a Author: Harald Anlauf Date: Th

[Bug fortran/84784] ICEs: verify_gimple failed with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #8 from a

[Bug c++/82632] copy deduction candidate erroneously preferred over deduction-guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82632 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd59d5d4a2ef8a97541a22399480bc1f8e82ceca commit r12-6901-gfd59d5d4a2ef8a97541a22399480bc1f8e82ceca Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug c++/82632] copy deduction candidate erroneously preferred over deduction-guide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82632 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b51fb28ed294cdf19087ca9d9ad107c9c52bec42 commit r12-6902-gb51fb28ed294cdf19087ca9d9ad107c9c52bec42 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: S

[Bug fortran/104128] ICE in gfc_widechar_to_char, at fortran/scanner.c:199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104128 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

  1   2   >