https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f2201bf48e828a7072616fff9dbd64367dcea30
commit r11-9508-g9f2201bf48e828a7072616fff9dbd64367dcea30
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
I did but it didn't work either. So I think we need to properly propagate the
suppression bits. Something like this:
diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
index bf2f60cce9a..0d266241b8c 100644
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101831
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.2.0, 12.0
Summary|Spurious
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Obviously the
6131 if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (*from_p))
6132 copy_warning (assign, *from_p);
doesn't work because we are not dealing with a comparison here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104194
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Abusing complex fp, what a dastardly plan! :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104215
Bug ID: 104215
Summary: bogus -Wuse-after-free=3 due to forwprop moving a
pointer test after realloc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Bertalan ---
Here's an even smaller test case (https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/ee9GceMx3):
===
template struct Optional {
~Optional() {
if (m_has_value)
value();
}
T value();
bool m_has_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Right now, all the C front end does with statement attributes is parses
them and then passes them to c_warn_unused_attributes; it doesn't have any
other handling for such attributes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104205
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Printing an expression within the diagnostic message is generally
problematic, but it might be good to change the caret location to point to
the expression rather than the keyword "case" (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae36f839632ddb67a53c26e9c7e73b0f56c4c11b
commit r12-6850-gae36f839632ddb67a53c26e9c7e73b0f56c4c11b
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104030
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regressions] huge |[12 Regressions] huge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
I'm persuaded by your argument that we don't need to care about compatibility
with the 8.1 handling of these types, which weren't yet really usable, so we
can go with the simpler patch. But I'd like to hea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
--- Comment #13 from Bill Schmidt ---
We discussed this with Jakub today, and we concur.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104216
Bug ID: 104216
Summary: -w overrides #pragma GCC diagnostic which overrides
-Werror
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103065
Bug 103065 depends on bug 103069, which changed state.
Bug 103069 Summary: cmpxchg isn't optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
Bug ID: 104217
Summary: gcc-12-20220123 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack
of secure_getenv
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
nptl/pthread_mutex_unlock.c in glibc has:
do
{
newval = oldval & PTHREAD_MUTEX_PRIO_CEILING_MASK;
}
while (!atomic_compare_exchange_weak_release (&mutex->__data.__lock,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
nptl/pthread_create.c has
do
pd->nextevent = __nptl_last_event;
while (atomic_compare_and_exchange_bool_acq (&__nptl_last_event,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, there is a check for it in configure I don't know why it is being it is
being checked as true.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #2 from James McKelvey ---
Builds with gcc-11-20220122.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
>checking for secure_getenv... yes
Can you attach
/home/McKelvey/gcc-12-20220123/x86_64-pc-cygwin/libstdc++-v3/config.log ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
nptl/npt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm:
https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/cygwin-patches/2019-q1/msg6.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #5 from James McKelvey ---
Created attachment 52284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52284&action=edit
Config log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> nptl/nptl_setxid.c in glibc has
>
> do
> {
> flags = THREAD_GETMEM (self, cancelhandling);
> newval = THREAD_ATOMIC_CMPXCHG_VAL (self, cance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Summary|gcc-12-20220123
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
so the cygwin libraries include secure_getenv but the header file defines it
only when __GNU_VISIBLE is true. Someone who knows cygwin headers can better
help here than me really. But I think libstdc++ check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I already approved the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104218
Bug ID: 104218
Summary: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types tests rely on
GCC overload-resolution bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103433
--- Comment #2 from jin xia ---
Is there any status update for this issue? Thank you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103433
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This looks like undefined code so even gcc should not ICE, the code will never
do the right thing for what you want to do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103057
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80871
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-25
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89564
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang also goes into an recursive template instantiation exceeded maximum depth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104218
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101138
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4ee27d3262fc4fc3e5d3535f195fdcf87d7ec77
commit r12-6853-gf4ee27d3262fc4fc3e5d3535f195fdcf87d7ec77
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997
--- Comment #11 from Levy Hsu ---
Hi Avieira
The baseline was one commit before. (ffc7f200adbdf47f14b3594d9b21855c19cf797a)
I'm experiencing some issue on local Vtune so I can't say which function or
front/backend was affected.
objdump shows so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Simplify
_4 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <_1, _1, { 4, 5, 6, 7, 4, 5, 6, 7 }>;
_5 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_4, 128, 0>;
to
_5 = BIT_FIELD_REF <_1, 128, 128>;
in match.pd?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Another note, a quick look at synth_mult shows that it should support vector
modes just fine but we are passing it the scalar mode. We do know the
vector type that's going to be used so we should better p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
index bea04992160..856b8bd222e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
@@ -3050,13 +3050,13 @@ vect_synth_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104210
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
201 - 253 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
