[Bug middle-end/104171] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed. verify_gimple_in_seq; gimplify_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104171 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/104184] [11/12 Regression] ICE Error reporting routines re-entered. xref_basetypes since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug middle-end/103641] [11/12 regression] Severe compile time regression in SLP vectorize step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sat, 22 Jan 2022, roger at nextmovesoftware dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103641 > > --- Comment #20 from Roger Sayle --- > IMHO, the problem is in tree-vect

[Bug c++/104184] [11/12 Regression] ICE Error reporting routines re-entered. xref_basetypes since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Started with r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a. Which does make it look so much related to PR 103057.

[Bug c++/104197] clang: gcc/cp/pt.cc:28481:19: warning: predefined identifier is only valid inside function [-Wpredefined-identifier-outside-function]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104197 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- So the error message comes from the following: int tree_check(int, int, const char*); int g(int t = tree_check(1, 1, __FUNCTION__));

[Bug c++/104197] clang: gcc/cp/pt.cc:28481:19: warning: predefined identifier is only valid inside function [-Wpredefined-identifier-outside-function]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104197 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, internal-improvement

[Bug c++/104197] [12 Regression] clang: gcc/cp/pt.cc:28481:19: warning: predefined identifier is only valid inside function [-Wpredefined-identifier-outside-function]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104197 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Summary|clang:

[Bug c++/104197] [12 Regression] clang: gcc/cp/pt.cc:28481:19: warning: predefined identifier is only valid inside function [-Wpredefined-identifier-outside-function]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104197 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Something like this will fix the warning: apinski@xeond:~/src/upstream-gcc-git/gcc/gcc/cp$ git diff diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc index bba62a5800a..33969fc646c 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc +++ b/gcc

[Bug c++/104197] [12 Regression] clang: gcc/cp/pt.cc:28481:19: warning: predefined identifier is only valid inside function [-Wpredefined-identifier-outside-function]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104197 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- I should mention the use of __FUNCTION__ inside the default argument is rejected by MSVC which is why I have marked it as a build failure.

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] New: [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 Bug ID: 104198 Summary: [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- > Does the patch in bug 104153 comment 3 help? No: I'd tried that already to no avail.

[Bug rtl-optimization/104153] [12 Regression] ICE due to recent ifcvt changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-24 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/104171] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed. verify_gimple_in_seq; gimplify_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/104172] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ppc64le mangling ICE with -flto -ffat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le --- Comment #8 from Richar

[Bug target/104172] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ppc64le mangling ICE with -flto -ffat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is what it should do. But it also has a mangling langhook and the backend uses it in the hope that it is a C++ FE langhook that will mangle the names like they were previously except with the s/u9__iee

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-24 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > Did you try to run the testsuite of the 32-bit compiler with -m64, for example > gcc.c-torture/execute, and see whether the miscompilation is v

[Bug tree-optimization/102087] [12 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in determine_exit_conditions, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1049 since r12-3136-g3673dcf6d6baeb67

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:634de54f9c421b7069865d0d7365ad97412f34bd commit r12-6834-g634de54f9c421b7069865d0d7365ad97412f34bd Author: Jiufu Guo Date: Fri Jan

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug c++/104180] [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug target/104199] New: [12 Regression] g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_5.C and g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_6.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104199 Bug ID: 104199 Summary: [12 Regression] g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_5.C and g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_6.C fail Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/104199] [12 Regression] g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_5.C and g++.target/aarch64/sve/dup_sel_6.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104199 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug other/104181] [12 Regression] The redundant build.log file in the root directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/104184] [11/12 Regression] ICE Error reporting routines re-entered. xref_basetypes since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/104187] Call site specific attribute to control inliner

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. For C++ an attribute on the call stmt might work even better. Note we're low on bits to represent this on the GENERIC CALL_EXPR and the GIMPLE gcall.

[Bug target/104189] enable 64-bit compare-and-swap on SPARC/Linux with V9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.0|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 rdapp at linux dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdapp at linux dot ibm.com

[Bug ipa/104187] Call site specific attribute to control inliner

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. For C++ an attribute on the call stmt might work even better. I think even C, it might be better too. [[]] syntax is there for GNU C now too. But t

[Bug c/103587] [10/11 Regression] ICE in c_parser_consume_token, at c/c-parser.c:850 since r10-4633-g4e03c3a7c1149a8e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103587 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c239267759be2cf3e1afadea86aff5ba3517d934 commit r11-9490-gc239267759be2cf3e1afadea86aff5ba3517d934 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/103838] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 --param max-early-inliner-iterations=0 --param max-inline-insns-auto=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103838 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2712f1249e0a8dd663a02bdf710a455fe5b14e3f commit r11-9491-g2712f1249e0a8dd663a02bdf710a455fe5b14e3f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/103837] [9/10/11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fmove-loop-invariants -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103837 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06142a317a4e71e509d9e009615adec2fdfa9c67 commit r11-9492-g06142a317a4e71e509d9e009615adec2fdfa9c67 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/103813] [11 Regression] Crash in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 fold-const since r11-5271-g4866b2f5db117f9e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103813 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbc542de1bcf2361b9a3b5d2e52efbd5388c83bf commit r11-9493-gfbc542de1bcf2361b9a3b5d2e52efbd5388c83bf Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/103860] [9/10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 with -fPIC on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4e45a579e274eef09a1f8e7251927c084097322 commit r11-9494-ga4e45a579e274eef09a1f8e7251927c084097322 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/103012] [11 Regression] ICE with #pragma GCC optimize followed by long line (4047 long)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be66fad59a7f74f96f47c1ae7d9f0a8e2b9a5f9e commit r11-9495-gbe66fad59a7f74f96f47c1ae7d9f0a8e2b9a5f9e Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug preprocessor/89971] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE: unspellable token PADDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:533695ca333bdfa056979520fbcde3752f14bb7c commit r11-9496-g533695ca333bdfa056979520fbcde3752f14bb7c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug objc/103639] [11 Regression] switch case with break in fast enumeration loop generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103639 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27cfe1068239cdafb727de36ec7d9ae19ff5c141 commit r11-9497-g27cfe1068239cdafb727de36ec7d9ae19ff5c141 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/103908] gcc miscompile asm goto for O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103908 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0dd533da49cf15aa9afd35634ba4bd80e9c96565 commit r11-9498-g0dd533da49cf15aa9afd35634ba4bd80e9c96565 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/103912] ICE in a consteval function which returns a lambda which takes a "non-POD" argument and the consteval has other code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103912 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18abe529d092ca00903fe6a9ec5210c91d45030f commit r11-9499-g18abe529d092ca00903fe6a9ec5210c91d45030f Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/103881] Wconversion false positive when using |= and &= with two rvalues in binary op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103881 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:777b73e45983b11e010bd5192185ad01af444de4 commit r11-9500-g777b73e45983b11e010bd5192185ad01af444de4 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/101537] -Wconversion false positive in ternary and |=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:777b73e45983b11e010bd5192185ad01af444de4 commit r11-9500-g777b73e45983b11e010bd5192185ad01af444de4 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/103480] [10/11 Regression] -Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb4998fcdf2ad92fc6323fc4d9bc03299ca8a541 commit r11-9501-gcb4998fcdf2ad92fc6323fc4d9bc03299ca8a541 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/104055] Temporary with consteval constructor does not cause the deconstructor to be called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104055 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91ac88cada3960517415bc92ae6d2d13a5e779a0 commit r11-9502-g91ac88cada3960517415bc92ae6d2d13a5e779a0 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/102860] [12 regression] libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 ICEs after r12-4526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:baf18a6d47c4325be004cb6289d4057b113de282 commit r11-9504-gbaf18a6d47c4325be004cb6289d4057b113de282 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/103874] [11 Regression] ICE in internal_error on riscv64 and -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103874 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3991e4c752b3450decdb36e0b562e044ce653b3d commit r11-9505-g3991e4c752b3450decdb36e0b562e044ce653b3d Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/102478] [9/10/11/12 Regression] during RTL pass: ce3: ICE: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1167 with -O2 -fno-if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102478 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:505b418a40a339cca86e977158fe38e4d5df7aa9 commit r11-9506-g505b418a40a339cca86e977158fe38e4d5df7aa9 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/104195] Fails to optimize nested array indexing p[i/N].data[i%N]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104195 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- On GIMPLE the candidates are IVOPTs (for in-loop accesses) and SLSR (for out-of-loop accesses). SLSR sees _1 = i_5(D) >> 2; _2 = _1 * 16; _3 = p_6(D) + _2; _4 = i_5(D) & 3; _8 = _3->data[_4]; a

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 --- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #6 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- > I can take a look - would one of the compile farm SPARC machines be ok to > reproduce this? I'm currently trying on gcc64, but that

[Bug c++/104197] [12 Regression] clang: gcc/cp/pt.cc:28481:19: warning: predefined identifier is only valid inside function [-Wpredefined-identifier-outside-function]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104197 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/104198] [12 regression] ifcvf change breaks 64-bit SPARC bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/104200] New: [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200 Bug ID: 104200 Summary: [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status:

[Bug debug/103874] [11 Regression] ICE in internal_error on riscv64 and -gsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103874 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/104200] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/103480] [10 Regression] -Werror=useless-cast with constexpr destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103480 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression] |-Wer

[Bug c++/103912] ICE in a consteval function which returns a lambda which takes a "non-POD" argument and the consteval has other code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103912 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 11.3 too.

[Bug rtl-optimization/103908] gcc miscompile asm goto for O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103908 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 11.3 too.

[Bug objc/103639] [11 Regression] switch case with break in fast enumeration loop generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103639 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 11.3 too.

[Bug preprocessor/89971] [9/10 Regression] ICE: unspellable token PADDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/103012] [11 Regression] ICE with #pragma GCC optimize followed by long line (4047 long)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 11.3 too.

[Bug rtl-optimization/103860] [9/10 Regression] wrong code at -O3 with -fPIC on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] wrong |[9/10 Regression] wrong

[Bug middle-end/103813] [11 Regression] Crash in decompose, at wide-int.h:984 fold-const since r11-5271-g4866b2f5db117f9e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103813 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/103837] [9/10 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -Og -fmove-loop-invariants -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103837 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] |'-

[Bug debug/103838] [11 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O2 --param max-early-inliner-iterations=0 --param max-inline-insns-auto=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103838 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/104180] [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) w/ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104180 --- Comment #6 from Arseny Solokha --- Meanwhile, I've finally added -gno-statement-frontiers to my testing scripts.

[Bug c/103587] [10 Regression] ICE in c_parser_consume_token, at c/c-parser.c:850 since r10-4633-g4e03c3a7c1149a8e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103587 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/103012] [11 Regression] ICE with #pragma GCC optimize followed by long line (4047 long)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103012 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc/103639] [11 Regression] switch case with break in fast enumeration loop generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/104201] New: [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104201 Bug ID: 104201 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c fails Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fa

[Bug testsuite/104201] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104201 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c/104171] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed. verify_gimple_in_seq; gimplify_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104171 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/104162] [12 Regression] Missed CSE after lowering of &MEM[ptr_1 + CST]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Btw, in VN it would be nice to handle struct S { int i; }; int i; int bar (char *p) { char *q = p + 1; i = 1; char *r = (char *)&(((struct S *)&p[i])->i); return q == r; } the main issue here is

[Bug target/99932] OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries --- New minimal oacc example: ... int main (void) { int vectors_max = -1; #pragma acc parallel\ num_gangs (1) num_workers (1) \ copy (vectors_max) { for (in

[Bug other/104181] [12 Regression] The redundant build.log file in the root directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Fixed, but maybe we can look to reject this in the ChangeLog verifier? Sure, that's possible. Do we speak about build.log in root directory, or at any path?

[Bug target/99932] OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 52273 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52273&action=edit New cuda reproducer $ ./do.sh DRIVER SASS, ptxas=-O0: + /home/vries/cuda/11.4.3/bin/nvcc vector-max.cu -Wno-dep

[Bug other/104181] [12 Regression] The redundant build.log file in the root directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug other/104181] [12 Regression] The redundant build.log file in the root directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Don't we have a rule for New file. additions without ChangeLog coverage? I thought that was supposed to be for the testsuite directories only, but maybe it triggers here too.

[Bug ipa/104187] Call site specific attribute to control inliner

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187 --- Comment #3 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > > Confirmed. For C++ an attribute on the call stmt might work even better. > > I think even C, it might be better too. [[]] syntax is there for GNU C now > too. > But those only apply to

[Bug bootstrap/104170] [12 Regression] Failed to bootstrap by r12-6807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104170 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c31a8be4a5db11a0a0e97c366dded6362421086 commit r12-6838-g2c31a8be4a5db11a0a0e97c366dded6362421086 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: M

[Bug other/104181] [12 Regression] The redundant build.log file in the root directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Don't we have a rule for New file. additions without ChangeLog coverage? No. > I thought that was supposed to be for the testsuite directories only, but > maybe

[Bug other/104181] [12 Regression] The redundant build.log file in the root directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104181 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > I think it is only the toplevel directory. > E.g. note also r12-6491-g49ad4d2c30387ec916b16ddc1e235bcb5e53b3b2 > which had toplevel empty Makefile.am added, had M

[Bug c++/103598] [12 regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION_ lost namespaces in types since r12-5783-gf78eaffd1538efb4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103598 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFI

[Bug middle-end/102461] overflow in omp parallel for schedule (static,chunk_size)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102461 --- Comment #5 from Michele Martone --- Hi Jakub. Thanks for confirming the details of the algorithm determining the boundaries. If we take Table 2.5 of the OpenMP spec: https://www.openmp.org/spec-html/5.1/openmpsu48.html#x73-73045 it says ab

[Bug tree-optimization/102636] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-3136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102636 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/102131] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-3136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 102636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:385196adb52d854ebf4f9237e8a521a17c5524c5 commit r12-6839-g385196adb52d854ebf4f9237e8a521a17c5524c5 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: M

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd0377a460db9d8b286e03a701227ebd62132c89 commit r12-6840-gcd0377a460db9d8b286e03a701227ebd62132c89 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: M

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ebb09f5e49c8ca06728bb791415d985df01f6d8 commit r12-6842-g0ebb09f5e49c8ca06728bb791415d985df01f6d8 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/104202] New: when defining a std::string in a module implementation file using -O2 g++ segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104202 Bug ID: 104202 Summary: when defining a std::string in a module implementation file using -O2 g++ segfaults Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/104203] New: [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 Bug ID: 104203 Summary: [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug ipa/104203] [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 52275 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52275&action=edit testcase Happened during the outage that lasted through most of the holidays. I've attached the smallest of

[Bug middle-end/103500] Stack slots for overaligned stack temporaries are not properly aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103500 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug ipa/104203] [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Target Milestone|--

[Bug ipa/104203] [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- GCC 11 takes ~10s to compile this at -O0 while trunk takes ~60s for me.

[Bug target/104172] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ppc64le mangling ICE with -flto -ffat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 52276 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52276&action=edit gcc12-pr104172.patch Untested patch to do the mangling aliases inside of the C++ FE. My preference is still t

[Bug ipa/104203] [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Ever confirmed|0

Re: [Bug ipa/104203] [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

So I assume that this is due to new pass_waccess which was added into early optimizations. I think this is not really ipa component but tree-optimize.

[Bug ipa/104203] [12 Regressions] huge IPA compile-time regression since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104203 --- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- So I assume that this is due to new pass_waccess which was added into early optimizations. I think this is not really ipa component but tree-optimize.

[Bug tree-optimization/101508] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Possible undefined behaviour in cpp program using "unsigned" type starting with r9-4145

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101508 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1af8528d34418bc874ae9d993ee0dc3559972d2 commit r12-6844-gf1af8528d34418bc874ae9d993ee0dc3559972d2 Author: Richard Biener Date:

  1   2   3   >