https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> It should be supported. There might be a dup copying the alignment though
> for the coroutines.
Bug not dup. Autocorrect got to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #4 from Luke Dalessandro ---
Oh, that would be great. I tried relatively hard to find a bug like that, but I
have previously shown a surprising level of incompetence with bugzilla search.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156
--- Comment #7 from Chengnian Sun ---
A quick question. Besides the flags `-fcompare-debug -g3 -O3`, are there any
other flags I should enable to better/faster find such -fcompare-debug
failures?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
What I am trying to say is there is a bug in gcc when dealing with alignas with
coroutines. I don't think there is a dup of this bug in the database.
I am also saying is this should work. When I get in front
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104136
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Fixed in commit f9063d12633c62a089115df032a19295854d8b06 on January 21, 2022.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104136
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103763
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abe3a4f0e9c461789b689e78d6116b1efffc1b5b
commit r12-6814-gabe3a4f0e9c461789b689e78d6116b1efffc1b5b
Author: Michael Meissner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103763
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
So this works for me on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|12.0|11.1.1
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[diagnostic] basic.align#9 |coroutine frame is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
so I think you might have found a defect in the C++ standard dealing with
coroutines. I looked and there is no mention of alignment when it comes to the
state of the coroutine at all even.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note LLVM/clang has the same issue and there was a patch for the issue here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106248
I don't see the followup patch though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2014r0.pdf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
See the discussion at
https://www.mail-archive.com/cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org/msg222834.html
I wonder what this means for GCC here.
able-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220121 (experimental) [master -gcaca8eddd] (GCC)
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104178
--- Comment #1 from Chengnian Sun ---
Sorry for the long test case. I tried my best to reduce it. The reported test
program is the best I could get.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104179
Bug ID: 104179
Summary: Truncated representation of character arrays as
non-type template parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
201 - 218 of 218 matches
Mail list logo