[Bug middle-end/100045] Precomputing division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100045 cafxx+gcc.gnu.org at strayorange dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cafxx+gcc.gnu.

[Bug tree-optimization/104156] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/104156] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -funswitch-loops since r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/104151] [9/10/11/12 Regression] x86: excessive code generated for 128-bit byteswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/104141] nested requires statement causes access to private member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104141 --- Comment #4 from Fedor Chelnokov --- In ``` template concept t = requires{ A::f(); }; ``` A::f() does not depend on template parameter, so the rules here are somewhat different than in T::f(). A possible answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/

[Bug c++/104142] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Spurios warning unused-variable on const static variable and defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Summary|Spurios warning

[Bug c++/104141] nested requires statement causes access to private member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104141 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Fedor Chelnokov from comment #4) > A::f() does not depend on template parameter, so the rules here are somewhat > different than in T::f(). A possible answer: > https://stackoverflow.com/a/70783

[Bug tree-optimization/104156] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -funswitch-loops since r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Started with r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b. I suspect this just exposed the issue inside loop unswitch though.

[Bug c++/104141] nested requires statement causes access to private member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104141 --- Comment #6 from Fedor Chelnokov --- I agree that Clang behavior here might be wrong. Submitted https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53334

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/104152] [12 Regression] ICE with -Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 52253 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52253&action=edit error message on windows

[Bug rtl-optimization/104153] [12 Regression] ICE due to recent ifcvt changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104153 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target|

[Bug rtl-optimization/104154] [12 Regression] Another ICE due to recent ifcvt changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- inside d:\x86_64-windows-gnu\aarch64-linux-android can you find all files called stddef.h and print their path?

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > inside d:\x86_64-windows-gnu\aarch64-linux-android can you find all files > called stddef.h and print their path? D:\x86_64-windows-gnu\aarch64-linux-android\aarch64

[Bug tree-optimization/104156] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -funswitch-loops since r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- You say it works with the host as linux, can you show the output of -v while compiling?

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- By the way the order looks wrong: d:\x86_64-windows-gnu\aarch64-linux-android\bin\../lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-android/12.0.1/include d:\x86_64-windows-gnu\aarch64-linux-android\bin\../lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-a

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #8 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 52254 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52254&action=edit result from linux Yes on linux include/v1/c++ goes first. BTW Can we just make --with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=$P

[Bug c++/104157] libc++ does not work properly with x86_64-w64-mingw32 host, but works fine with x86_64-linux-gnu host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #9 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > You say it works with the host as linux, can you show the output of -v while > compiling? Same issue happens with x86_64-ubuntu-linux-gnu target, x86_64-w64-mingw32

[Bug middle-end/104151] [9/10/11/12 Regression] x86: excessive code generated for 128-bit byteswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Richard - I'm sure we can construct a similar case for aarch64 where > argument passing and vector mode use cause spilling? > > On x86 the simpl

[Bug c++/104157] -std=libc++ does not with cross compilers and moving the install around (places the include path last)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Summary|libc++ d

[Bug c++/104157] -std=libc++ does not with cross compilers and moving the install around (places the include path last)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- Somehow add_standard_paths is doing the wrong thing when -iprefix is applied but I have no idea how or why. This definitely needs to be fixed but it is a low priority as -std=libc++ is not used that much, e

[Bug c++/104000] Ordinary constructor cannot delegate to `consteval` constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104000 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-21 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/104000] Ordinary constructor cannot delegate to `consteval` constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104000 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/104157] -std=libc++ does not with cross compilers and moving the install around (places the include path last)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #12 from cqwrteur --- well. plus canadian cross back compiler From windows to linux. probably only i cross compile Linux programs on windows.(several other people downloaded my toolchains.) Get Outlook for Android

[Bug c++/104157] -std=libc++ does not with cross compilers and moving the install around (places the include path last)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104157 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #12) > well. plus canadian cross back compiler From windows to linux. > probably only i cross compile Linux programs on windows.(several other > people downloaded my toolc

[Bug sanitizer/103978] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed with threads and thread canceling with glibc 2.28+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103978 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||contino at epigenesys dot com --- Comme

[Bug sanitizer/104158] New: [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 Bug ID: 104158 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Priority|P3

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/104000] Ordinary constructor cannot delegate to `consteval` constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104000 --- Comment #4 from Fedor Chelnokov --- If we take MSVC into consideration, then it rejects ``` struct A { consteval A() = default; A(int) : A() {} }; ``` which GCC accepts. So there is a divergence with MSVC as well.https://gcc.g

[Bug rtl-optimization/102478] [9/10/11/12 Regression] during RTL pass: ce3: ICE: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1167 with -O2 -fno-if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102478 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2d9159717b474f9c06dde4d32b48b87164deb50 commit r12-6786-gc2d9159717b474f9c06dde4d32b48b87164deb50 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug middle-end/104151] [9/10/11/12 Regression] x86: excessive code generated for 128-bit byteswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > Richard - I'm sure we can construct a similar case for aarch64 where > > argument passing and vector mod

[Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb5ee6464809e051e0292471597931a660485658 commit r12-6787-geb5ee6464809e051e0292471597931a660485658 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjones at redhat dot com --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/104151] [9/10/11/12 Regression] x86: excessive code generated for 128-bit byteswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > > Richard - I'm sure we can construct a similar case fo

[Bug tree-optimization/103721] [12 regression] wrong code generated for loop with conditional since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug analyzer/104159] New: ICE: in finalize, at vector-builder.h:513 with -O -fanalyzer

model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.1 20220121 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug rtl-optimization/104153] [12 Regression] ICE due to recent ifcvt changes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104153 --- Comment #1 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com --- I was able to reproduce the ICE on a cross compiler. Curiously, we do not even succeed with if-conversion here but nevertheless emit an insn (jump_insn 78 9 79 6 (set (pc) (if_then_else

[Bug tree-optimization/104152] [12 Regression] ICE with -Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104152 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ad72811242eb84dde1bb2e97d0804d6eabeac8a commit r12-6789-g1ad72811242eb84dde1bb2e97d0804d6eabeac8a Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/104156] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -funswitch-loops since r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f953c8bc5bf314a57a6ba347ee6f5f5e3f1dad53 commit r12-6790-gf953c8bc5bf314a57a6ba347ee6f5f5e3f1dad53 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/104152] [12 Regression] ICE with -Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104152 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/104156] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -funswitch-loops since r12-4526-gd8edfadfc7a9795b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104156 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/104159] ICE: in finalize, at vector-builder.h:513 with -O -fanalyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/104160] New: Wrongly allowed: Function argumentin constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104160 Bug ID: 104160 Summary: Wrongly allowed: Function argumentin constant expression Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/104161] New: Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 Bug ID: 104161 Summary: Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The commit also regressed -fno-sanitize-coverage=trace-pc etc. and the opt*.awk extension I'm working will not be able to handled that. What improvements the r12-1177 change brought? -f{,no-}sanitize-coverag

[Bug target/100354] [9/10/11/12 regression] aarch64: non-deligitimized UNSPEC UNSPEC_TLS (76) found in variable location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100354 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-04-30 00:00:00 |2022-1-21 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/100288] [11/12 Regression] g++-11 internal error and fails to precompile a concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/100211] [9/10/11/12 Regression] aarch64: OOB accesses in aarch64_{save,restore}_callee_saves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100211 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||internal-improvement Priorit

[Bug middle-end/104151] [9/10/11/12 Regression] x86: excessive code generated for 128-bit byteswap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4) > Also there's separate issue, codegen for below is not optimal > gimple: > _11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(a_3(D)) > asm: > mov QWORD PTR [rsp-24], rdi >

[Bug target/100354] [9/10/11/12 regression] aarch64: non-deligitimized UNSPEC UNSPEC_TLS (76) found in variable location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100354 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is a note to backend maintainers that they should try harder if possible to delegitimize it.

[Bug tree-optimization/100089] [11/12 Regression] 30% performance regression for denbench/mp2decoddata2 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/100086] [11 Regression] spurious -Wnonnull with __builtin_expect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] spurious |[11 Regression] spurious

[Bug c++/99757] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7736

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99757 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug sanitizer/99673] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with address sanitizer due to member address substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] bogus|[11 Regression] bogus

[Bug sanitizer/104158] [12 Regression] gcc no longer accepts -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc,trace-cmp since r12-1177

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104158 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- I was motivated by what the current master provides: $ gcc -fsanitize-coverage=tracecmp a.c gcc: error: unrecognized argument in option ‘-fsanitize-coverage=tracecmp’ gcc: note: valid arguments to ‘-fsanitiz

[Bug sanitizer/99673] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with address sanitizer due to member address substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:caca8eddd9356777f5fe28454eb083b1779adc26 commit r12-6793-gcaca8eddd9356777f5fe28454eb083b1779adc26 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/104162] New: [12 Regression] Missed CSE after lowering of &MEM[ptr_1 + CST]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162 Bug ID: 104162 Summary: [12 Regression] Missed CSE after lowering of &MEM[ptr_1 + CST] Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/104162] [12 Regression] Missed CSE after lowering of &MEM[ptr_1 + CST]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/104161] Potential Security Vulnerability: remove_all and symbolic link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104161 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ Assignee|unassign

[Bug tree-optimization/104162] [12 Regression] Missed CSE after lowering of &MEM[ptr_1 + CST]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Testcase that did not regress: struct S { int i; }; void foo (int *); void bar (char *p) { foo (&((struct S *)(p + 1))->i); foo ((int *)(p + 1)); } Testcase that did regress (use -fgimple): struct

[Bug middle-end/99578] [11/12 Regression] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-03-15 00:00:00 |2022-1-21 Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/99015] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99015 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Last reconfirmed|2021-09-14 00:00:

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11/12 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/98621] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: x from g referenced in f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98621 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/100089] [11/12 Regression] 30% performance regression for denbench/mp2decoddata2 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:199cd0e0f8744ca1e61a95987b2d020a592a46d9 commit r12-6795-g199cd0e0f8744ca1e61a95987b2d020a592a46d9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100089] [11 Regression] 30% performance regression for denbench/mp2decoddata2 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] 30% |[11 Regression] 30%

[Bug c/97991] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in c_parser_consume_token, at c/c-parser.c:850

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97991 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/97968] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Unnecessary mov instruction with comparison and cmov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97968 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal Priority|P3

[Bug ipa/96750] [9/10/11/12 Regression] 10-12% performance decrease in benchmark going from GCC8 to GCC9/GCC10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96750 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Needs re-evaluation with GCC 11 / 12 and see if it's worth continue to track this bug.

[Bug c/96546] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in default_conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96546 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/96057] [9/10/11/12 Regression] -Wreturn-type warning message disappears with -O1+ in anonymous namespace definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96057 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug c++/95999] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:5951

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95999 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug ipa/95558] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Invalid IPA optimizations based on weak definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95558 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/95126] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Missed opportunity to turn static variables into immediates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95126 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/104163] New: Misleading diagnostic for incompletely initialized constinit variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104163 Bug ID: 104163 Summary: Misleading diagnostic for incompletely initialized constinit variable Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnost

[Bug fortran/104164] New: Bogus warning issued by -Wsurprising

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104164 Bug ID: 104164 Summary: Bogus warning issued by -Wsurprising Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/104163] Misleading diagnostic for incompletely initialized constinit variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104163 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-01-21 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug tree-optimization/94905] [10/11 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug tree-optimization/94905] [10/11 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug sanitizer/99673] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with address sanitizer due to member address substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- (

[Bug tree-optimization/94905] [10/11 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Oh, and the reduced testcase is correct to warn on I think.

[Bug c++/93503] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Duplicated error on pure virtual template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93503 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |11.2.1 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/92752] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "ignored qualifiers" warning on const-qualified pointer-to-member-function objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/92335] [10/11/12 Regression] sinking of loads happen too early which causes vectorization not to be done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92335 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Priority|P3

[Bug c++/91112] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bad error message for virtual function of a template class. Wrong "required from here" line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91112 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/90524] [10/11/12 Regression] attribute name and argument mixed up in an error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90524 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug sanitizer/89764] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ubsan diagnostic on generic lambdas decayed to function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Richard Bie

[Bug middle-end/89292] [9/10/11/12 regression] test case gcc.target/powerpc/rs6000-fpint.c fails after r268705

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89292 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, ra Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/85390] [9/10/11/12 Regression] possible missed optimisation / regression from 6.3 with conditional expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85390 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/84900] [9/10/11/12 Regression] cast of compound literal does not cause the code to become a non-lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84900 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/82894] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Inherited member functions do not create ambiguity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82894 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/81958] [9/10/11/12 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in gcc-8, or with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81958 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/78825] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing error for template partial specialization using template alias type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78825 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/70682] [9/10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug building LLVM with checking=release compiler on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70682 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/67196] [9/10/11/12 Regression] loop-induced false positive from -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67196 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

  1   2   3   >