https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104106
--- Comment #2 from denis.campredon at gmail dot com ---
The missed optimisations are also present if the arrays are allocated with
malloc or new.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111
Bug ID: 104111
Summary: Concept evaluation depends on context where it was
first checked
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
Bug ID: 104112
Summary: ICE with -Ofast -march=armv8.2-a+sve
-msve-vector-bits=512
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111
--- Comment #1 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Sorry, related discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/q/53263299/7325599
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #1 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Created attachment 52227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52227&action=edit
a slightly rewritten reproducer that passes compilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104005
--- Comment #7 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Thanks Richard for the quick fix!
Unfortunately, I just found an other (and much older) issue (ICE, only at
-Ofast) I reported at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b834435c8fa4cb9424787fe3044a49fef7992de8
commit r12-6726-gb834435c8fa4cb9424787fe3044a49fef7992de8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-19
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53836c887a05db23ff3b9fc06f64e0ba78810ece
commit r12-6727-g53836c887a05db23ff3b9fc06f64e0ba78810ece
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104103
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
--- Comment #29 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #28)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #25)
> > in fold_unary_loc
> > ---cut from fold-const.cc-
> > 9276 else if (TREE_CODE (arg0) == COND_EXPR)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
--- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771
>
> --- Comment #29 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
Bug 102706 depends on bug 102744, which changed state.
Bug 102744 Summary: [12 regression] -O2 vectorization causes
Wzero-length-array-bounds-2.c to fail on arc-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102744
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 102706, which changed state.
Bug 102706 Summary: [12 regression] -O2 vectorization causes regression in
Warray-bounds-48.c on many targets
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102706
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102705
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
so it's _10 == _10 ^ 1 vs. (short) _2 == (short)(((char) _2) ^ 1)
likely simplified using logical_inverted_value which works fine for the first
but not the second form. We're now doing more simplification
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104110
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nate at thatsmathematics dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #22 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #21)
> > _12 = Gif_ClipImage_gfi_1.0_1 + -1;
> > during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch
> > bug760.c:3:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
> > 0xde2f5a verify_gimple_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104002
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52218|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52229
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52229&action=edit
gcc12-pr102860-2.patch
And here is IMHO a better one that for VECTOR_TYPE just returns unknown_optab
so that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104096
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-19
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104029
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104098
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104100
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104061
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect what ever fix that comes up for PR 103836 will also fix this one. -g
is needed in both cases and the "# DEBUG BEGIN_STMT" happens in both cases too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104061
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I was right and wrong, in the sense it might fix the testcase in comment #0 but
it won't fix:
int arr_0;
void
foo (void)
{
#pragma acc kernels
{
int k;
#pragma acc loop
for (k = 0; k < 2; k++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104105
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113
Bug ID: 104113
Summary: DR 625 forbids "auto" being used in template argument
and parser fails to issue correct error message for it
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104065
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104106
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think DSE doesn't quite understand free() as must-def, likewise for
__builtin_stack_restore though that is _much_ more difficult to tie to
a specific alloca allocation.
It would be nice if the gimplifier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104054
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
For some reason the pass does not detect usage of Register si in (insn 55):
(debug_insn 55 54 56 6 (var_location:TI b (reg/v:TI 4 si [orig:86 b ] [86])) -1
(nil))
Register ax (1):
Register dx (1):
Regis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Auto has nothing to do with the problematic error message, take:
template
struct A{};
A x = A();
GCC still produces:
:4:13: error: cannot convert 'A' to 'int' in initialization
4 | A x = A();
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|DR 625 forbids "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is we hit
vect_create_partial_epilog (tree vec_def, tree vectype, code_helper code,
gimple_seq *seq)
{
unsigned nunits = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (TREE_TYPE (vec_def)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, the V8DFmode is actually VNx2DF but I guess the constant size will fool us
to think it's not a variable size mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FIXME
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104113
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The following adds such verification
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
index 0fe3529b2d1..6ce33f3cef0 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc
@@ -4979,9 +497
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52230
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52230&action=edit
patch I am testing
I'm testing this patch on x86_64-linux, aarch64 testing appreciated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and we're also not verifying
/* The target has to make sure we support lowpart/highpart
extraction, either via direct vector extract or through
an integer mode punning. */
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Thanks for the patch. I'm currently testing it on SVE.
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Without -msve-vector-bits=512 we simply get variable length vector code.
> There doesn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
On i?86 we could eventually hit the same issue with
unsigned short foo (unsigned short *a, int n)
{
unsigned short sum = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
sum += a[i];
return sum;
}
since V8HI is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103538
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d6c63ba490ec92245f04b5cbafc56abd28e8d22
commit r12-6732-g9d6c63ba490ec92245f04b5cbafc56abd28e8d22
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jan 18 08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103538
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cef99175af1ad95283d4b35bced73c3a510f6d6
commit r12-6733-g2cef99175af1ad95283d4b35bced73c3a510f6d6
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jan 18 15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52230|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Please bear with me, as I'm coming up to speed, and my head hurts from all
these equivalences.
The problem seems to be what Jeff mentioned in comment #4.
We think _5 == _6, which makes the conditional in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104114
Bug ID: 104114
Summary: vect.exp fails when run with
-Wvector-operation-performance due to bogus
diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104054
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Without debug instructions, the compiler is able to rename insns to:
65: di:DI=si:DI
66: dx:DI=r11:DI
74: cx:QI=0x1
REG_EQUAL 0x1
41: L41:
42: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 6
43: NOTE_INSN_DEL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104114
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104115
Bug ID: 104115
Summary: Does not understand that inequality is transitive
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99571
--- Comment #3 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
> Here is another testcase which shows a similar issue:
Here's its link: https://godbolt.org/z/fMbYMMYKz. You posted the Comment 0's.
> Note clang has a bogus warning for the above about the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104115
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104115
--- Comment #2 from Thibaut Vandervelden ---
Sorry, my bad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104115
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104115
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, gcc.dg/tree-ssa/evrp-trans.c seems to cover it for int, but perhaps it
would be useful to have a variant of the testcase with unsigned types instead
of signed too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b6788ae5a365aecd6776f563e44022acb93a57a
commit r12-6737-g5b6788ae5a365aecd6776f563e44022acb93a57a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476
--- Comment #9 from Stas Sergeev ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Please report the problem to upstream libsanitizer project:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues
I already did:
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104115
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f35bb467a01db988d5fe1637db5bff4b4f9e7086
commit r12-6738-gf35bb467a01db988d5fe1637db5bff4b4f9e7086
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffc7f200adbdf47f14b3594d9b21855c19cf797a
commit r12-6739-gffc7f200adbdf47f14b3594d9b21855c19cf797a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102938
Bug 102938 depends on bug 102860, which changed state.
Bug 102860 Summary: [12 regression] libgomp.fortran/simd2.f90 ICEs after
r12-4526
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102860
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 102700, which changed state.
Bug 102700 Summary: [12 Regression] wrong location in -Wuninitialized after -O2
vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104116
Bug ID: 104116
Summary: Optimize {FLOOR,CEIL,ROUND}_{DIV,MOD}_EXPR in
tree-vect-patterns.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
If it is undefined it should be unreachable, not switch to a random static
branch ;) (defeating uninit diagnostics, of course)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Stas Sergeev from comment #9)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> > Please report the problem to upstream libsanitizer project:
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4ca0a53be18dfc7162fd5dcc1e73c4203805e14
commit r12-6740-gf4ca0a53be18dfc7162fd5dcc1e73c4203805e14
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104111
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
Bug ID: 104117
Summary: gcc10 fails to build icu for ppc64 on 10.5.8 (direct
access to a floating-point constant)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103538
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:892c58d93110e1b30d7ebe93e704f318d16c34a3
commit r11-9480-g892c58d93110e1b30d7ebe93e704f318d16c34a3
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103538
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d3f5f5e52a123d7da96b659064fc2a4b8de5e64
commit r11-9481-g1d3f5f5e52a123d7da96b659064fc2a4b8de5e64
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104118
Bug ID: 104118
Summary: gcc11 fails to build R for ppc64 on 10.5.8
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104119
Bug ID: 104119
Summary: Wrong -Werror=format-overflow= since
r12-5014-g6b8b959675a3e14c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104119
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104108
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104118
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
reduced testcase:
typedef int int32_t;
extern "C" {
extern double floor( double );
extern double fabs( double );
int atoi(const char *);
int sprintf(char * , const char * , ...) ;
}
namespace icu_67 {
clas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102650
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> If it is undefined it should be unreachable, not switch to a random static
> branch ;) (defeating uninit diagnostics, of course)
Well, its not unreachable..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104083
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The ACATS testsuite is not based on DejaGNU so it cannot. IIRC Rainer had a
> patch to do the conversion at some point but it was heavyweight.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104083
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
> Once could of course argue that eventually the acats/run_all.sh can somehow
> pick up options from the RUNTESTFLAGS argument (it might need to
+,lto --enable-checking-yes --enable-multiarch
--prefix=/scratch/software/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220119 (experimental) [master -g1ead972ce] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104117
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Fedorov ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> most likely present on earlier branches.
Indeed, gcc7.5 likewise failed to build icu for ppc64.
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo