https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103753
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80841
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
For the original testcase, GCC accepts the code even for -std=c++17 starting
with GCC 7.2.0 (and 8+) and rejected it in GCC 7.1.0 with:
: In function 'int main()':
:22:95: error: invalid use of incomplete typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80662
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Reduced thanks to K-ballo:
Hmm, clang compiles and gives:
member
While both GCC and ICC compiles and gives:
non-member
And MSVC rejects it with:
(15): erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56936
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80886
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This has nothing to do with __builtin_constant_p really.
Just GCC started to rejecting:
constexpr void *phardware {((void *) 0x1000)};
Starting in GCC 7; it was accepted before.
What is interesting is the _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86966
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.4.7
Last reconfirmed|2018-08-15 00:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Siddhe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89563
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I notice clang has the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88176
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This one is still rejected. clang also has the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||60679
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1647
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87108
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ghabriel.nunes at hotmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@klipp-lischner.net
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58124
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61594
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.4
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103936
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:765693be1c8dc91fe612e7a499c5e41ba398ab96
commit r12-6339-g765693be1c8dc91fe612e7a499c5e41ba398ab96
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65591
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:765693be1c8dc91fe612e7a499c5e41ba398ab96
commit r12-6339-g765693be1c8dc91fe612e7a499c5e41ba398ab96
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103936
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25751
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase:
template struct gg{};
int main(void)
{
gg v;
v.begin();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78104
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89639
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103847
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66502
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103840
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103797
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11146
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
So we were doing:
Define the macros @sc{__gnuc__}, @sc{__gnuc_minor__}
Where texi2pod.pl does:
s/\@sc\{([^\}]*)\}/\U$1/g;
Which should be fine. It should have replaced @sc{__gnuc__} with __GNUC__.
We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103802
--- Comment #6 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> So the point is that P is invariant but we do not hoist it because it's
> computed in a (estimated) cold block? I notice that the condition is
> inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
201 - 242 of 242 matches
Mail list logo