[Bug c/103649] -Wno-attribute=foo::bar implies no arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103649 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/77390] generates INDIRECT_REF of void type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77390 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/88404] ICE (tree check) with -fsanitize=thread on Fortran2003 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88404 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/41911] Unnecessary copying of array descriptors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41911 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2009-11-0

[Bug fortran/43172] Unnecessary array temporary - non-pointer/non-target does not alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43172 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2010-02-2

[Bug fortran/43837] Set TREE_NOTHROW also on libgfortran library calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43837 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug fortran/45425] Bounds check applied before MASK of WHERE construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45425 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|2010-08-28

[Bug fortran/49592] [OOP] Non-polymorphic ALLOCATE with polymorphic SOURCE= rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||5.5.0 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/57611] [Fortran-Dev Regression] Too much memory allocated (gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_alloc_2.f90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57611 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I can't reproduce this even in GCC 4.9.4.

[Bug fortran/57079] [Fortran-dev] version/type/attribute fields not set with CLASS components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57079 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Something changed in GCC 8 and we get: : x_22 = __builtin_malloc (144); if (x_22 == 0B) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : _gfortran_os_error (&"Allocation would exceed memory limit"[1]{l

[Bug fortran/49331] Accepts invalid specification expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49331 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0) > gfortran currently compiles http://www.fortran.com/iso_varying_string.f95 > with -std=f2003 without any error. File does not exist any more :(. (In reply to Dom

[Bug fortran/45396] Apply front-end pass also for arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45396 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug driver/66765] gfortran passing fortran-specific options to ld and collect2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66765 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Component|fortran

[Bug fortran/56156] Reject calls to external procedures using non-module declared TYPEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56156 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug fortran/58002] [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer context: Shall use a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Ifort also produces: 420 420

[Bug fortran/58002] [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer context: Shall use a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Ifort also produces: > > 420 420 I should say using -stand f03 and -stand f95.

[Bug fortran/68101] Provide a way to allocate arrays aligned to 32 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68101 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/69695] slice of an array retains pointer attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69695 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/103761] New: [12 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103761 Bug ID: 103761 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2239 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/103744] [12 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a52f2334eb032a70beb688e9fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #5) > (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #4) > > The apparently related case: > I think this is actually a separate bug. Could you open a new PR for it?

[Bug fortran/64097] Bug with nested WHERE constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/55214] Program fail to evaluate where clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55214 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/103761] [12 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103761 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

<    1   2