https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744
Bug ID: 103744
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:889
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99199
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It doesn't trigger anymore since
r12-3903-g0288527f47cec6698b31ccb3210816415506009e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
AH!
unit-size
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set 1 canonical-type
0x7fdf17594738 precision:64 min max
pointer_to_this >
VNx2DI
size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571
--- Comment #25 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #22)
> Yes, besides TARGET_VECTOR_MODE_SUPPORTED_P, other part in the attached
> patch looks fine, the condition should be binded to real instructions but
> not mode.
OK
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103694
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
On my environment(s) a preceding ICE (see backtrace) disappeared
for r10 between 20200412 (ICE) and 20200419 (Error) :
$ gfortran-10-20200412 -c z1.f90
z1.f90:5:17:
5 |type(t) :: x((0.)/0)
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103745
Bug ID: 103745
Summary: Warn on throwing an exception not derived from
std::exception
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
On my environment(s) the history for r9 is as follows :
<= 20181028 : Error: Unexpected '%' for nonderived-type variable 'x' at
(1)
20181104..20190824 : ICE in check_assumed_size_reference/gfc_format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103745
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98507
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103742
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.3.1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95564
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #3 from Jiang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103644
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c1ac0bf3d44e4ca6e32533d8b498c7d1dbd2425
commit r12-6012-g2c1ac0bf3d44e4ca6e32533d8b498c7d1dbd2425
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103644
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103744
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103729
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Przemyslaw Wirkus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a68862e782847752be0ea2b2a987278cdbefc9e
commit r12-6013-g0a68862e782847752be0ea2b2a987278cdbefc9e
Author: Przemyslaw Wirkus
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Bug ID: 103746
Summary: GCC 12 rejects code on "call to non-‘constexpr’
function ‘glsl::vec3&
glsl::vec3::operator=(glsl::vec3&&)’" while gcc 11 and
clang accepts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103709
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103709
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> All right, I've got a patch candidate:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/586999.html
Sorry, wrong bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-16
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 52013
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52013&action=edit
Correct testcase
Oops, uploaded inrrect testcase. This should be current one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC 12 rejects code on |[12 Regression] GCC 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r12-5256-g37326651b439bac5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103729
--- Comment #3 from Przemyslaw Wirkus ---
ILP32 fix is still pending.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks. But the point of this PR is that bootstrapping trunk is broken.
That needs fixing some way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
struct VectorType {
void operator=(VectorType);
};
template using V4 = VectorType;
using Float = V4;
struct vec3 {
Float x;
};
struct mat3 {
vec3 data[3];
constexpr mat3() { data[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Summary|[12 Regression] Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Note Clang and ICC accept the code, while GCC and MSVC reject it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43d67e5e75627ad1f5ba2e983a730f37547ba9b7
commit r11-9394-g43d67e5e75627ad1f5ba2e983a730f37547ba9b7
Author: Martin Liska
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
MSVC error:
(12): error C3615: constexpr function 'mat3::mat3' cannot result in a
constant expression
(12): note: failure was caused by call of undefined function or one not
declared 'constexpr'
(12): note:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh it is IFNDR (Ill-formed, no diagnostic required) code too :). So accepting
the code is fine so is rejecting it but it is still ill-formed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103747
Bug ID: 103747
Summary: Passing parameter pack expansion to alias template
with one argument fails as function return type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>> * toplevel configure needs to make certain that the bootstrap gdc can compile
>> *and link* some t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103747
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
CWG DR 1430 does look similar to this issue really:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1430
template type alias is a mess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103746
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2af3581cba0e7fa662bd8bed7e3b90451ef6a94
commit r10-10341-ga2af3581cba0e7fa662bd8bed7e3b90451ef6a94
Author: Martin Liska
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103739
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Thanks. But the point of this PR is that bootstrapping trunk is broken.
> That needs fixing some way.
It's working when you use gcc-10 or later as the basel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101238
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
--- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt ---
Is there a way to convey that it is safe to access every and all parts of S,
e.g. by initializing S::b at construction time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103735
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 52014
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52014&action=edit
Reduced as I can get it right now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|12.0|
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103741
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch missing a check on vec_mode, testing a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52014|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52015|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
0xccadfb do_warn_unused_parameter(tree_node*)
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/c-family/c-warn.c:2414
0xa74de1 finish_function(bool)
/home/apinski/src/upstream-gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c:1781
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103748
Bug ID: 103748
Summary: [PDT] Variable declaration with PDT syntax when the
type is not a PDT fails to trigger a syntax error
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96533
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-16
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78214
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88306
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103749
Bug ID: 103749
Summary: Misleading error message on template/non-template
conflict
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103749
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103749
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Same case:
template
struct bar;
struct bar {
int baz;
};
bar var;
Maybe xref_tag could detect this.
The other way round it's a bit better:
struct bar;
template
struct bar {};
bar var;
103749-2.C:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103750
Bug ID: 103750
Summary: [i386] GCC schedules KMOV instructions that destroys
performance in loop
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103751
Bug ID: 103751
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-48.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84250
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Maxim, any updates?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101255
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98507
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103696
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b8f5a50a93c5fd44fa1ecb6f431fee1df267571
commit r12-6018-g5b8f5a50a93c5fd44fa1ecb6f431fee1df267571
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103709
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54e6d3ef5021d7df936132ba961f9c360239e717
commit r12-6019-g54e6d3ef5021d7df936132ba961f9c360239e717
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103709
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 103696, which changed state.
Bug 103696 Summary: pragma optimization is not applying to Lambdas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103696
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103752
Bug ID: 103752
Summary: [12 Regression][ICE][modules] with import
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103690
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt(stmt)
> _67 = _14 + _66;
>
>
> Before pre had:
> intD.9 * __trans_tmp_1D.2946;
>
> # RANGE [1, 9223372036854775807] NONZERO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #3)
> On my environment(s) the history for r9 is as follows :
>
><= 20181028 : Error: Unexpected '%' for nonderived-type variable 'x'
> at (1)
> 201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98507
--- Comment #4 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Thanks! nice to have this fixed!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 52018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52018&action=edit
configure check compiler driver understands D
How does this patch look?
Because the module name is not "object"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #7)
> Created attachment 52018 [details]
> configure check compiler driver understands D
>
> How does this patch look?
>
> Because the module name is not "object", it bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103751
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
char buf_p2[sizeof (struct A1) + 2 * sizeof (int16_t)];
This has space for 1 * int32_t and 3 * int16_t, so the warning is correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102106
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
There is only one call to free() generated, and it is called on an address that
does not point to allocated memory, so it should not be too hard to determine
what is happening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103735
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] Extra glibc |[12 Regression] Extra glibc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54878
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102722
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101475
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 102722, which changed state.
Bug 102722 Summary: [Disgnostic]Xpass for gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-68.c after
O2 vectorization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102722
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:271e36d9d5b3a75e7f1a927e594477e6a5dd6fc0
commit r12-6021-g271e36d9d5b3a75e7f1a927e594477e6a5dd6fc0
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83035
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb2a7f80a98de3febefbb32b1e4898062bdb6af8
commit r12-6022-gbb2a7f80a98de3febefbb32b1e4898062bdb6af8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb2a7f80a98de3febefbb32b1e4898062bdb6af8
commit r12-6022-gbb2a7f80a98de3febefbb32b1e4898062bdb6af8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100465
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb2a7f80a98de3febefbb32b1e4898062bdb6af8
commit r12-6022-gbb2a7f80a98de3febefbb32b1e4898062bdb6af8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100465
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103571
--- Comment #27 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #17)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #16)
> > There're already testcases for vec_extract/vec_set/vec_duplicate, but those
> > testcases are written under TARGET_A
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
