https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37452
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can't reproduce the results in GCC 4.9 or above (I have not really tried
anything before either).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56152
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-08-21 00:00:00 |2021-12-11
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63532
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60437
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103656
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Do you have x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip in your path?
Was x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip built when you build the cross binutils?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103656
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also I doubt anyone tests -j on make install or make install-strip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103660
Bug ID: 103660
Summary: Sub-optimal code with relational operators
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103635
--- Comment #6 from Mark Harmstone ---
Created attachment 51973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51973&action=edit
preprocessed source
Thanks Andrew, attached.
Relevant bits:
typedef unsigned int size_t;
typedef unsigned in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102396
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #3)
> Hello Patrick,
>
> Thank you for the insights. I'm left wondering however if the CWG resolution
> would possibly ever allow the operator== to be defined as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Bug ID: 103661
Summary: __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for
avx512vbmi2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51891|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #28 from Mikael Morin ---
I’m reading the previous comments again:
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> So to clarify the ARRAY_REF constraints - there is currently no way to
> construct a valid ARRAY_REF where an index d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh it does say positive integer:
This function returns a positive integer if the run-time CPU supports feature
and returns 0 otherwise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103364
--- Comment #25 from Sarah Julia Kriesch ---
The kernel bug fix in combination with higher constraints (12GB of memory) has
helped. It is strange, that we had this error message instead of an oom.
BUT that should be only a workaround.
12GB for s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
Bug 52489 depends on bug 51255, which changed state.
Bug 51255 Summary: Using -fwhole-program breaks code which puts values in
.ctors or .init_array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, rejects-valid
Target Miles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662
Bug ID: 103662
Summary: TBAA problem in Fortran FE triggering in
gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |preprocessor
Target|
amp;& invocable...>
;
template
concept zippable_with =
and_v...> &&
copy_constructible &&
views::zippable_with__concept_;
And there now is the invocable check.
But this would've been a lot easier to track d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103656
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Do you have x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip in your path?
> Was x86_64-w64-mingw32-strip built when you build the cross binutils?
yes of course.
the problem is that fixinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103606
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e913caad081ea85da4f257265f2d3383cdbe8d5
commit r12-5911-g7e913caad081ea85da4f257265f2d3383cdbe8d5
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103588
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1bc9dba5c720b67d19df4d94634bb89ad5ade23
commit r11-9376-gb1bc9dba5c720b67d19df4d94634bb89ad5ade23
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #63 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #62)
> Can't reproduce with the current master:
Righto. This is proving unexpectedly hard to reproduce.
EITHER: I search various values of march= to find out which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103664
Bug ID: 103664
Summary: std::regex_replace bug if the string contains \0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103411
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:263826d6f52d1cc3611554ba0e131347e874aebf
commit r10-10332-g263826d6f52d1cc3611554ba0e131347e874aebf
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe00eaefa42d17de3c98c274967dd0f7ad7be463
commit r10-10333-gfe00eaefa42d17de3c98c274967dd0f7ad7be463
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f49f2ad78360ea6634deca9a8cc35f9c4f1051d
commit r10-10334-g1f49f2ad78360ea6634deca9a8cc35f9c4f1051d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103411
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102717
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102787
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
Bug ID: 103665
Summary: insert_trap in gimple-isolate-paths interferes badly
with modref, pure-const and other optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96067
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoni Boucher :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:611fdb0fc5b95ee15215e2e3679834f311919096
commit r12-5912-g611fdb0fc5b95ee15215e2e3679834f311919096
Author: Antoni Boucher
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoni Boucher :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:611fdb0fc5b95ee15215e2e3679834f311919096
commit r12-5912-g611fdb0fc5b95ee15215e2e3679834f311919096
Author: Antoni Boucher
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96066
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #64 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #63)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #62)
> > Can't reproduce with the current master:
>
> Righto. This is proving unexpectedly hard to reproduce.
>
> E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #13)
> static inline void copy (const char *p)
> {
> int N = null_safe_strlen (p);
> if (N) /* disabling this branch prevents the warning */
> __builtin_memcpy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100062
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |d
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
Sw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103666
Bug ID: 103666
Summary: compiling single-file programs with -fprofile-generate
no longer leads to intended results
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Kneifel ---
Created attachment 51975
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51975&action=edit
First try of a patch, making it unsigned (and correcting the resolver
generator)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoni Boucher :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6b7f68bfd61fcd02842e672476f9924d5ba1d3c
commit r12-5913-gc6b7f68bfd61fcd02842e672476f9924d5ba1d3c
Author: Antoni Boucher
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101751
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Will the patch be backported to gcc-11 branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95415
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103664
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note LLVM's libc++ also has the same bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103635
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Mark Harmstone from comment #6)
> Created attachment 51973 [details]
> preprocessed source
>
> Thanks Andrew, attached.
>
> Relevant bits:
> typedef unsigned int size_t;
> typedef unsigned int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52600
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103635
--- Comment #8 from Mark Harmstone ---
Created attachment 51976
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51976&action=edit
preprocessed source
Sorry!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103635
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Mark Harmstone from comment #8)
> Created attachment 51976 [details]
> preprocessed source
Can you attach /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/usr/include/corecrt.h ?
because I suspect it is bug there:
beca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71345
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> A simpler case would be:
>
> int foo(int a, int b, int c)
> {
> if(b == c && b == c) return 1; /* warns with -Wlogical-op */
> if(a && b == c && b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30171
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(this is the last bug left open blocking bug 30334, by the way)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103667
Bug ID: 103667
Summary: [12 Regression] Accepting invalid explicitly
specialized template with incorrectly ordered template
parameter lists
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103667
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the ICE is a regression from 4.8.x though rather than a recent regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103667
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthewjbarichello at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66564
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #5 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90472
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93971
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99955
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
handle_vector_size_attribute does:
/* Build back pointers if needed. */
tree new_type = build_vector_type (type, nunits);
/* Build back pointers if needed. */
*node = lang_hooks.types.reconstruct_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100526
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100527
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100535
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100545
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-12
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-10-01 00:00:00 |2021-12-11
Target Milestone|10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|9.0 |8.5.0
Keywords|
74 matches
Mail list logo
