https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103144
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103144
>
> --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
> Another issue is for SLP, when trip count is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Bug ID: 103515
Summary: Unexpected OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT of
rs6000_isa_flag
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
--- Comment #1 from Kewen Lin ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes. This is working as intended.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103456
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da9386f9a70ac494939650c0e0a0e4168a6f76d8
commit r12-5649-gda9386f9a70ac494939650c0e0a0e4168a6f76d8
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103124
--- Comment #5 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> Skipping mode TI for zero_extend lowering.
> Splitting mode TI for ashift lowering with shift amounts =
> Splitting mode TI for lshiftrt lowering with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103511
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems like a defect in the standard.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103453
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And as documented:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.2.0/libstdc++/manual/manual/using_macros.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103144
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So neither cunroll itself nor the triggered FRE afterwards do what forwprop
would do - fold each stmt. There's no propagation into them so FRE doesn't
fold,
but we don't fold at stmt creation time (that's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97090
--- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon ---
Indeed I don't see that anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103456
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103415
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac5fd364f0978c62ae759e7b36ce6b912a27546c
commit r12-5651-gac5fd364f0978c62ae759e7b36ce6b912a27546c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102356
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35f2c098c81118020b1d288cd739108c8747a520
commit r12-5652-g35f2c098c81118020b1d288cd739108c8747a520
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100977
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c264208e161830a5642ee3125871c23110508462
commit r12-5653-gc264208e161830a5642ee3125871c23110508462
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t, |ICE in compare_bound_mpz_t,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103507
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103515
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103516
Bug ID: 103516
Summary: internal compiler error in comptypes, typeck.c:1558
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
Bug ID: 103517
Summary: ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:242 with -O2
-march=skylake-avx512
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103516
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:242 |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103516
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjfloyd at wanadoo dot fr
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102356
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103516
--- Comment #3 from Paul Floyd ---
Forgot to say, this is building llvm. And it does look like 10715.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102356
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6a43f5c64b4000233c552891abc13cbd447e5703
commit r11-9346-g6a43f5c64b4000233c552891abc13cbd447e5703
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102356
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103511
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103518
Bug ID: 103518
Summary: g++ hangs on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103518
Egor Pugin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egor.pugin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e2e6cc84c46ff7ceb6395c0309a2c6b71d83cb1
commit r11-9347-g5e2e6cc84c46ff7ceb6395c0309a2c6b71d83cb1
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2ecc42195e8af1992d12e678e761c73557eaf56
commit r10-10318-gd2ecc42195e8af1992d12e678e761c73557eaf56
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103518
--- Comment #2 from Egor Pugin ---
Callgrind https://www.dropbox.com/s/3ro2ulrfp6jma8f/callgrind.out.39995?dl=1
Interestingly, clang++-13 hangs for 50 s. while gcc for 150 s.
Probably, clang also does something wrong here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb137e85720654e41db370d952df226654e576a6
commit r12-5688-gcb137e85720654e41db370d952df226654e576a6
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103464
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod ---
Stack frame depth issued should be completely resolved in GCC12 now by patches
for PR 103231 and a follow up for PR 103464.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e625a44f6f3001cea31e0f7c563943ecba92b68
commit r12-5689-g1e625a44f6f3001cea31e0f7c563943ecba92b68
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 103517, which changed state.
Bug 103517 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:242 with -O2
-march=skylake-avx512 since r12-5612-g10833849b55401a5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103517
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103519
Bug ID: 103519
Summary: Address sanitizer check missing for AVX512 masked load
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103519
David Long changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dlong at cadence dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103507
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: aarch64-*-*
Target: aarch64-*-*
make[3]: Entering directory
'/opt/gcc/gcc-20211201/Build/aarch64-suse-linux/libphobos/libdruntime'
/bin/sh ../libto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103501
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:056551414a328b427c4bf4955b9a3832f344685c
commit r12-5693-g056551414a328b427c4bf4955b9a3832f344685c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96074
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96074
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 51913
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51913&action=edit
proof of concept to reduce uninit warnings with the path solver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
[from the POC patch]
It seems that every missed thread (due to inability of the threader,
or due to cost restraints) is a potential false positive for the
uninit code. Perhaps what we need is a way to iden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
There's also
https://www.nist.gov/itl/ssd/software-quality-group/other-assurance-tool-test-collections
Currently the only non-Java collection on the list is:
https://sir.csc.ncsu.edu/portal/index.php
Ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103127
--- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please see the details of the discussion of the patch for this bug:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg275509.html
as a summary, we decide to exclude OPAQUE_TYPE from auto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82090
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I never explored the idea, but Bodik has a discussion of recording infeasible
paths in the CFG which would seem to address this issue. He was using the
concept in the context of coverage analysis -- the ide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80548
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> Created attachment 51908 [details]
> untested patch
>
> Like this. It fixes the problem at least for -O2.
Richi responded that the current BB copier won't ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:54ebec35abec09a24b47b997172622ca0d8e2318
commit r12-5694-g54ebec35abec09a24b47b997172622ca0d8e2318
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I've fixed the threading slowdown. Can someone verify and close this PR if all
the slowdown has been accounted for? If not, then someone needs to explore any
slowdown unrelated to the threader.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101912
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have a patch:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/char_traits.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/char_traits.h
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ namespace __gnu_cxx _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
{
_GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #8 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
the minimum option to repeat this failure is "-O1 -mno-strict-align".
The option "-mno-strict-align" is the one that make the difference.
For the following call to .DEFERRED_INIT:
MEM[(int[0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94490
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Patch finally posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/585932.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7dd5b92bbe0944dc27e6175b0df72ed0a7188016
commit r9-9852-g7dd5b92bbe0944dc27e6175b0df72ed0a7188016
Author: Martin Jambor
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from David Malc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allan.chandler at oakton dot
com.a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103501
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> I haven't checked the unordered containers yet to see if they have the same
> issue.
This still needs to be done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d683a1b3e89007211a7c800bb61647d8ac42cb6b
commit r12-5695-gd683a1b3e89007211a7c800bb61647d8ac42cb6b
Author: Bill Schmidt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103491
--- Comment #4 from Pavel M ---
To: jos...@codesourcery.com
Re: This testcase is incorrect.
Indeed. The F.10.8.3 was misunderstood.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103310
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53caa4723d8de73fe21e63ba264082f3071b2887
commit r12-5696-g53caa4723d8de73fe21e63ba264082f3071b2887
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103521
Bug ID: 103521
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/analyzer/pr93032-mztools.c
broken after r12-5585
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103127
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b1ef8b9db964ec2375df29a73d2b1651afe7ea9
commit r12-5698-g5b1ef8b9db964ec2375df29a73d2b1651afe7ea9
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103127
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #9 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
disable tree-ccp by adding -fno-tree-ccp cures the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101145
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de3e5aae6c4b540e808c822c1e878b0a3304d09c
commit r12-5699-gde3e5aae6c4b540e808c822c1e878b0a3304d09c
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103520
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
> index 6552eaf3b0c..1b2f5b310a7 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c
> @@ -4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Bug ID: 103522
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in
r12-5649
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103513
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #13 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> I've fixed the threading slowdown. Can someone verify and close this PR if
> all
> the slowdown has been accounted for? If not, then someone needs to explore
> any
> slowdown unrelated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
Bug ID: 103523
Summary: [12 Regression] SVE float auto-vect float format
expand failure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 08:26:25PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
>
> --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
An additional ICE seen on a month old tree is
during GIMPLE pass: veclower2
zbuf.i: In function 'd':
zbuf.i:3:1: internal compiler error: in to_constant, at poly-int.h:504
0xbc9494 poly_int_pod<2u, unsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> Ah yes. Good catch. Are you going to insert the 2 lines
> lower int the file? If so, I think you can considered
> the patch complete and reviewed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
commit r12-5700-g7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102881
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
commit r12-5700-g7eb961d83b0eda53aeb1cfaacdc367e1952de613
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
--- Comment #26 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The testcase now compiles with -O2 -mf16c to:
vpxor %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm2
vpblendw$1, %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
vpblendw$1, %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm1
vcvtph2ps %xmm1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 09:42:44PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103505
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Steve Karg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
looks like that this is exactly the same issue as exposed in pr102285.
and the original fix to pr102285 just hide this inconsistent IR issue.
-mno-strict-align exposed this issue again.
So. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102881
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
Oops, wrong PR number...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103274
--- Comment #12 from Tomas Kalibera ---
I've tested with GCC 10.3 with R. R can be built and passes its tests (without
the patch, it crashes). Also, I've checked the generated assembly with an awk
script looking for a call instruction immediatel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102471
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:860c56b5bc356960a4d0445dadc43ceddbe3c7e2
commit r12-5701-g860c56b5bc356960a4d0445dadc43ceddbe3c7e2
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 103483, which changed state.
Bug 103483 Summary: context-sensitive ranges change triggers stringop-overread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> I think we should come up with a better plan in general for "flow sensative"
> warnings really. Maybe only enable them with -O2 and above. But we keep on
> getti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Microblaze bswaphi2 |Microblaze bswaphi2 can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103520
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa10faa72d8e9e97b6e564f8b0a7b602538d0da0
commit r12-5704-gfa10faa72d8e9e97b6e564f8b0a7b602538d0da0
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed D
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
