https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103393
--- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Alternatively, couldn't we check next to that new
> && have_insn_for (SET, mode)
> also that
> && known_le (GET_MODE_SIZE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103393
--- Comment #13 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Also, note that the comment in gimple-fold.c prior to this change read:
/* If we can perform the copy efficiently with first doing all loads
and then all stores inline it that way. Curre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> > The nearly obvious fix:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/check.c b/gcc/fortran/check.c
> > index 837eb0912c0..3859e1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 09:02:34PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> (In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> > (In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> > > The nearly obvious fix:
> > >
> > > diff --git a
-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-5528-20211125184355-g9488d242066-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20211125 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103431
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unfortunately the patch in comment#5 does not work for me. :-(
Interestingly, the Intel compiler fails on the testcase, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98030
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|error message for enum |error message for enum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103423
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
Martin,
My original report here was on regression at July 17 2021 (range
g:0b7a11874d4eb428 and g:704e8a825c78b9a8)
which seems unrelated to g:r12-3903-g0288527f47cec669
which is in Sep 21 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:10:32PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
>
> --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Unfortunately the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79048
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103409
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> Started with r12-3903-g0288527f47cec669.
This is September change (for which we have PR102943) however the
regression range was g:1ae8edf5f73ca5c3 (or g:264f061997c0a534 on second
plot) and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98304
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-25
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98304
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> @1 == (@2)-1
Should have been:
@1 == -(@2-1)
maybe check that @1 is a mask.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103393
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #13)
> Also, note that the comment in gimple-fold.c prior to this change read:
>
> /* If we can perform the copy efficiently with first doing all loads
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101608
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7ae6e4e3831429d20eea1be285dbc6a4a005930f
commit r11-9314-g7ae6e4e3831429d20eea1be285dbc6a4a005930f
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8018e5c5ec0e9b6948182f13fba47c67b758d8a
commit r12-5532-gb8018e5c5ec0e9b6948182f13fba47c67b758d8a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:18:46PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:10:32PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
> >
> > --- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98547
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94957
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilord.tiran at yandex dot ru
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94957
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hehaochen at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71165
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92385
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||beyondstandard at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103432
Bug ID: 103432
Summary: [12 regression] libjxl-0.5 is miscompiled, works fine
with -fno-ipa-modref
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103432
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction, wrong-code
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103432
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103335
Bug 103335 depends on bug 103282, which changed state.
Bug 103282 Summary: New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-dse-5.c in r12-5292
fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103419
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:379be00f45f65e0e8de72a50553dd9d2bab6cc08
commit r12-5535-g379be00f45f65e0e8de72a50553dd9d2bab6cc08
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103419
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103419
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90cb088ece8d8cc1019d25629d1585e5b0234179
commit r12-5536-g90cb088ece8d8cc1019d25629d1585e5b0234179
Author: konglin1
Date: Wed Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98360
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC, ICC and MSVC all agree that this is valid code and all produce 4.
clang is the only one which rejects it.
Here is an even more reduced testcase:
template
struct uintset
{
T values[1];
struct traits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
--- Comment #25 from Kewen Lin ---
Status update:
>
> The fusion related flags have been considered in the posted patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/578552.html.
>
It's still being ping-ed for review since it'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103433
Bug ID: 103433
Summary: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:219
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
Maybe the register allocator should remove clobbers of pseudos, instead of
turning them into clobbers of hard register pairs. That would eliminate the
ambiguity after register allocation. It is also true that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
See also bug 103271 which can also be fixed by adding a movti pattern.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson ---
See also bug 103302 which can also be fixed by adding a movti pattern.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102768
--- Comment #6 from ashimida ---
RFC,v2: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585496.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, wilson at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103271
>
> Jim Wilson changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103432
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103434
Bug ID: 103434
Summary: Pointer subobject does not show to correct memory
location
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
101 - 153 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
