https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #6)
> With 04c5a91d068c4ca2f09c2bc206fce00db9d1790b reverted, the output is:
>
> $ grep -C5 'Cannot access ' gcccompile-REVERT.log
> Applying io_quotes_use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #9 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #6)
> > With 04c5a91d068c4ca2f09c2bc206fce00db9d1790b reverted, the output is:
> >
> > $ grep -C5 'Cannot access ' gcccomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
The question comes should we abort on broken /usr/include directories entry or
just continue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|parallel build hangs since |[12 Regression] parallel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a2aa63fad06a72d9770b08491f1a7809eac7c50
commit r12-5361-g7a2aa63fad06a72d9770b08491f1a7809eac7c50
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #11 from Zdenek Sojka ---
I can observe broken header symlinks on other long-standing Gentoo systems. I
don't know what's the situation like for other distros.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17da2c7425ea1f5bf417b954f444dbe1f1618a1c
commit r12-5362-g17da2c7425ea1f5bf417b954f444dbe1f1618a1c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103252
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
> Why cprop_hardreg can't handle this?
cprop_hardreg only prop hard register, not memory.
(insn 86 85 227 15 (set (reg:SI 68 k0 [132])
(mem/u/c:SI (plus:SI (reg:SI 3 bx [82])
(const:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka ---
Seems fixed on LNT now too https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/21494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103246, which changed state.
Bug 103246 Summary: [12 Regression] 416.gamess miscompare with -O2 -g
-flto=auto since r12-5223-gecdf414bd89e6ba251f6b3f494407139b4dbae0e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103069
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Hongyu Wang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15f5e70cbb33b40c97325ef9d7747a148d39
commit r12-5363-g15f5e70cbb33b40c97325ef9d7747a148d39
Author: Hongyu Wang
Date: Thu N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks Jakub! I'll apply the changes and do a regtest.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> Btw. started with r12-5236-g5aa91072e24c1e16.
Yep, I know - it is modref based DSE that lets us to enable that call as
dead. So the bug is technically mine if Richi decides to pass it to m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 51830
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51830&action=edit
New simplier patch which does the right thing too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102880
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10)
> > After r12-5301, on aarch64 I can see:
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-7.c scan-tree-dump thread2 "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f9f5101d52fec12f0f18dfaf746d18cf1f230d0
commit r12-5364-g8f9f5101d52fec12f0f18dfaf746d18cf1f230d0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103278
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e28afbb90f8eca31d0a658e92e2007eb0db2a964
commit r12-5365-ge28afbb90f8eca31d0a658e92e2007eb0db2a964
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103278
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edd2249b17fb7150da66b03adb1a4e381926047d
commit r12-5367-gedd2249b17fb7150da66b03adb1a4e381926047d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> This is simple (and fairly common) case we don't optimize
> struct a {
> int a;
> static __attribute__ ((noinline))
> int ret (int v) {ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103230
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think it is changed that is being read here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103298
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #5 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
>
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> > This is simple (and fairly common) case we d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> bool unknown_memory_access = false;
> if (summary = get_modref_function_summary (stmt, NULL))
> {
> /* First search if we can do someting useful.
> Like for dse it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100427
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #8)
> LOL. it bloats my mind. WHY WHY WHY are
>
> # DLL is installed to $(libdir)/../bin by postinstall_cmds
>
> Twice in libstdc++'s configure?
Because it includ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #12 from Xi Ruoyao ---
I'll make a workaround in maybe an hour...
But why should a distro ship broken symlinks?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #13 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #12)
> I'll make a workaround in maybe an hour...
>
> But why should a distro ship broken symlinks?
It broke during on of the updates, probably around 2017.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Isn't that just how debug location views work by design?
I bet llvm-dwarfdump doesn't understand those...
Just read https://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=170427.1
or Alex' papers on the topic...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103300
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No matter what, IMO assertions or aborts should be for bugs in the tool
(fixincl in this case), something that shouldn't happen if the tool doesn't
have bugs, while errors or possibly ignored errors should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103300
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] wrong code |[12 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311
Bug ID: 103311
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in
complex_mul_pattern::build(vec_info*)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103306
--- Comment #15 from Xi Ruoyao ---
patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584815.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103253
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a0bce98dcf84dd0a7b3ac67b51ac68758cc7ad0
commit r12-5369-g1a0bce98dcf84dd0a7b3ac67b51ac68758cc7ad0
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103253
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
Fixed the ice on trunk, the issue with the IFN still need to be addressed.
Unsure whether to reclassify this ticket or make a new one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103298
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The test looks fragile.
The instructions TBB and TBH can only support forward branches. If a label in
the list of switch targets is backwards then they can't be used and a
non-compressed table must be u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312
Bug ID: 103312
Summary: ICE in gfc_find_component
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103313
Bug ID: 103313
Summary: nontype_argument_pack - compile error due to
unsupported tree
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103311
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103230
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #24 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #12)
> The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c693978dd64b16637577ebf50c760053d7d2165
>
> commit r12-5328-g8c693978dd64b1663757
-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 2028 (experimental) [master r12-5359-g280d2838c11] (GCC)
[586] %
[586] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[587] %
[587] % gcc110 -O1 small.c; ./a.out
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:3:37: warning: right shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103314
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
BT below:
#0 0x011ee287 in wi::fits_to_tree_p > > > (x=...,
type=0x765f15e8) at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree.h:6263
#1 0x011ddf6f in force_fit_type (type=type@entry=0x765f15e8,
cst=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103314
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I bet the TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)) == TYPE_PRECISION (type)
case should only be allowed if @1 != @3, i.e. when the bitop initially has 2
conversions and turns it into just one, otherwise it will ping-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88590
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #0)
> Possible fix #1
> ===
>
> This is what I've been tinkering with
>
> 1) convert all the target libraries to use @rpath/libx.dylib as their
> install
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103226
--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez ---
This looks like a target or RTL problem.
The .optimized dumps between x86-64 and bfin-elf look the same for:
-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-vectorize -fno-thread-jumps -fno-ivopts
-fno-tree-pre -fdisable-tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103315
Bug ID: 103315
Summary: Gfortran DW_AT_Rank expression not emitting correct
rank value.
Product: gcc
Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is another case of the same bug:
constexpr bool
test()
{
int a[] = { 1, 2 };
int b[] = { 3, 4 };
if (a+0 == b+0) // OK
return false;
if (a+1 == b+0) // ERROR
retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103315
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103026
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
For refererence, here's a demo showing the colorized output on Compiler
Explorer:
https://godbolt.org/z/1sohErzWz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
This seems to work, would you like me to submit the patch or will you do it
Jakup?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102670
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fa8e0896c6ec96eddcedb2b92502a7bbb525c03
commit r12-5372-g6fa8e0896c6ec96eddcedb2b92502a7bbb525c03
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99911
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90de06a7b3ce6ae8381136e58a2dde91fbbb6eff
commit r12-5373-g90de06a7b3ce6ae8381136e58a2dde91fbbb6eff
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241
--- Comment #10 from Will Cohen ---
That example in comment #5 at [0x0055, 0x0055) looks
different than the original example as it is referring to an argument for an
inlined function. The function mentioned in the origin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Assuming you mean me, I can't test it easily so please go ahead and push it
yourself. I hereby approve it for trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103032
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Oh yes, sorry, I kept saying the wrong name :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103310
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103316
Bug ID: 103316
Summary: PowerPC: Gimple folding of int128 comparisons produces
suboptimal code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103316
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241
--- Comment #12 from Will Cohen ---
What is the "-dA" option?
What are the .LVUS* labels referencing in the generated set_memory.s referring
to? They are paired up with the .LLST* labels. From the earlier set_memory.s
that appears to be assoc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103317
Bug ID: 103317
Summary: Spec 2017 benchmark blender_r fails with -Ofast on
PowerPc (power9, power10)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103317
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103318
Bug ID: 103318
Summary: Spec 2017 benchmark perlbench_r fails on PowerPC for
-Ofast and -O3, passes with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca243ada71656651a8753e88164a1f0f019be1c3
commit r12-5376-gca243ada71656651a8753e88164a1f0f019be1c3
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103318
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
'-dA'
Annotate the assembler output with miscellaneous debugging
information.
It prints comments into the assembly, making the debug info in there readable
for humans.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103317
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
I'll try and creduce the test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #28 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2196a681d7810ad8b227bf983f38ba716620545e
commit r12-5377-g2196a681d7810ad8b227bf983f38ba716620545e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Oct 27 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103319
Bug ID: 103319
Summary: [coroutines] ICE in is_this_parameter, at
cp/semantics.c:10672
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103320
Bug ID: 103320
Summary: Spec 2017 benchmark roms_r fails on PowerPC for -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103320
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103320
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103318
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103317
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103254
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
This is a long sequence, made from the following pattern:
_156 = _155 & _147;
_157 = (int) _156;
j_158 = _157 & j_149;
_164 = (short int) j_158;
_165 = _164 & _156;
Since GORI doesn't yet cache
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Could someone post the relevant configury bits used for the ppc64le case.
For example, I have:
OPTIMIZE= -O3 -m64 -mcpu=power9 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops
-fvect-cost-model -mpopcntd -m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103319
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
ah, incidentally, that patch is likely also a fix for 96517.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #7)
> Could someone post the relevant configury bits used for the ppc64le case.
>
> I used:
>
> runcpu --config=myconfig -a validate --iterations=1 --ignore-erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103317
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref.c b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
index c94f0589d44..e5d2b11025a 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-modref.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
@@ -2033,10 +2033,7 @@ modref_eaf_analysis::merge_call_lhs_flag
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
