https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102948
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102753
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b2fda8bea3fdcc9421726e5a21e537f745cad0b
commit r12-4730-g4b2fda8bea3fdcc9421726e5a21e537f745cad0b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102753
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7473b8a90490e1dcd8fd5f7a92307d79fd2a5f8e
commit r12-4731-g7473b8a90490e1dcd8fd5f7a92307d79fd2a5f8e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102854
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b0f35299bd1468ebc13b900a73b7cac6181a2aa
commit r12-4732-g6b0f35299bd1468ebc13b900a73b7cac6181a2aa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92212
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102897
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f1fe0dc25391a1d73c1034a85b3b6bf04c5e26e
commit r12-4735-g4f1fe0dc25391a1d73c1034a85b3b6bf04c5e26e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Jessica King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jessicaking07 at protonmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102948
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
96c82a16b2076891a9974d0f0e96a0b85fbc2df4 is bad
runspec finished at Wed Oct 27 09:28:33 2021; 248 total seconds elapsed
278.22user 6.12system 4:06.58elapsed 115%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
838228maxresident)k
0i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102897
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
peterz at infradead dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peterz at infradead dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102216
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102946
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
> Very likely might be fixed with properly aligning the data like with adding
>
> a = __builtin_assume_aligned (a, __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__);
> b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102946
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51666|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102951
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102954
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> It was likely the vect_worthwhile_without_simd_p changes where we might now
> vectorize this loop using (unaligned) 'int'.
>
> Can you confirm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102959
Bug ID: 102959
Summary: gdc.dg/torture/pr96435.d FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102959
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57245
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102960
Bug ID: 102960
Summary: ICE: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855 in GCC 10.3.0
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84407
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-02-15 00:00:00 |2021-10-27
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96862
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Is this now fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84407
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51676
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51676&action=edit
patch
Testing for exact real-to-int / int-to-real conversions is a bit awkward but
maybe I am missing interest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51670|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96862
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102961
Bug ID: 102961
Summary: Build fails for AIX 6.1
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102962
Bug ID: 102962
Summary: shared locks / mutexes differ between linux and
windows
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 51679
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51679&action=edit
A patch to add -mindirect-branch-cs-prefix
It adds CS prefix to call and jmp to thunk when converting indirect call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102960
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102963
Bug ID: 102963
Summary: [modules] ICE failed static_assert of concept
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102904
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91992
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102963
--- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
As per the logic in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631#c1, this
isn't marked with any of the ice-* keywords.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102964
Bug ID: 102964
Summary: [12 regression] libgomp.c/doacross-1.c fails after
r12-
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102964
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-27
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102876
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51680
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51680&action=edit
gcc12-pr102876-wip.patch
WIP patch that adds the internal fns around dynamic initializers that could be
optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102965
Bug ID: 102965
Summary: C11 atomic functions accept incompatible arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84407
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:
> Also a question is the behavior on overflow when converting a real to an
> integer (IIRC the behavior here is undefined,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102965
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102505
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97cebda80d367737c0b25909af8063b63166e00b
commit r11-9189-g97cebda80d367737c0b25909af8063b63166e00b
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102886
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:97cebda80d367737c0b25909af8063b63166e00b
commit r11-9189-g97cebda80d367737c0b25909af8063b63166e00b
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
Bug ID: 102966
Summary: size() returns 0 for an unallocated array, no error
message or error exit
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82469
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51678|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967
Bug ID: 102967
Summary: -Waddress with nested structures: Incorrect "the
comparison will always evaluate as 'true'"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102968
Bug ID: 102968
Summary: macOS Monterey not yet supported in configure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102969
Bug ID: 102969
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C
fails after r12-4726
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102953
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Cooper ---
Thankyou. I've tried these two patches and they do appear to be behaving as
intended.
I've put together a slightly extended version of the original test. Compile
with gcc -Wall -fno-pic -Os -fcf-protectio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102970
Bug ID: 102970
Summary: stable_sort uninitialized value with -funroll-loops
-fno-tree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Cooper ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> The warning is intended: it points out that the second operand of the
> conditional expression is necessarily true:
>
> if ( !(pa ? &pa->c : NULL) )
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102968
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-27
Known to wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102968
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Oh wait it's been pushed to trunk now:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-October/582716.html
So, is that good, or should we leave open for backports?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5782bacacada41c0240f5aceb42dcdf78e7042da
commit r11-9191-g5782bacacada41c0240f5aceb42dcdf78e7042da
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102761
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102761
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9644864791547f8ecca23f23a8c6a64cfa79905c
commit r10-10239-g9644864791547f8ecca23f23a8c6a64cfa79905c
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102917
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102761
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> Not a regression, so let's not backport this too far.
>
> Fixed for gcc-11.3+.
Actually, gcc-10.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102968
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
peterz at infradead dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peterz at infradead dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to peterz from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > Created attachment 51678 [details]
> > A patch to add -mharden-sls=
> >
> > x86: Add -mharden-sls=[none|all|return|indirect-branch]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101324
--- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner ---
Here's a compile time only test case that correctly FAILs using the unpatched
compiler and passes using the patched compiler (requires a small change to
target-supports.exp to add the rop_ok test):
/* { dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101324
--- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner ---
Namely this:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 1c8b1ebb86e..0d9a3ba67ce 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #9 from peterz at infradead dot org ---
Created attachment 51683
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51683&action=edit
kernel patch to test -mharden-sls=all
$ make O=defconfig CC=gcc-12.0.0 arch/x86/entry/common.o
..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #10 from peterz at infradead dot org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> Created attachment 51679 [details]
> A patch to add -mindirect-branch-cs-prefix
>
> It adds CS prefix to call and jmp to thunk when converting indirect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99250
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102971
Bug ID: 102971
Summary: GCC cannot understand >>32 pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102971
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Here is clang
https://godbolt.org/z/7YjW1Ezrx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102972
Bug ID: 102972
Summary: [OpenMP] Strictly-nested diagnostic missing
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|stable_sort uninitialized |[11/12 Regression]
|v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102973
Bug ID: 102973
Summary: possible inconsistency in procptr_assignment handling
when matching ASSOCIATE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102970
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798
Olaf van der Spek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olafvdspek at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102970
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The gimple level looks correct:
[local count: 8209314308]:
# __cur_2 = PHI <__cur_149(5), _141(3)>
# __first_156 = PHI <__first_148(5), &D.24777(3)>
# prephitmp_155 = PHI
# prephitmp_153 = PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102969
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102971
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
#include
std::uint64_t umul_naive(std::uint64_t a,std::uint64_t b,std::uint64_t& high)
noexcept
{
std::uint32_t a0(static_cast(a));
std::uint32_t a1(static_cast(a>>32));
std::uint32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
Bug ID: 102974
Summary: GCC optimization is very poor for add carry and
multiplication combos
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
#include
#include
struct ul32x2
{
std::uint_least32_t low,high;
};
inline constexpr std::uint_least32_t umul_least_32(std::uint_least32_t
a,std::uint_least32_t b,std::uint_least32_t& high) noexcept
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> There might be another bug about _addcarryx_u64 already.
This is 32 bit addcarry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > There might be another bug about _addcarryx_u64 already.
>
> This is 32 bit addcarry.
but yeah. GCC does not perform opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102974
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #4)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > > There might be another bug about _addcarryx_u64 already.
> >
> > This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102966
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51679|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to peterz from comment #9)
> Created attachment 51683 [details]
> kernel patch to test -mharden-sls=all
>
> $ make O=defconfig CC=gcc-12.0.0 arch/x86/entry/common.o
> ...
> arch/x86/entry/common.o: war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102969
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102975
Bug ID: 102975
Summary: Local alias diagnosed as unused when used in failing
constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #13 from peterz at infradead dot org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> (In reply to peterz from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 51683 [details]
> > kernel patch to test -mharden-sls=all
> >
> > $ make O=defconfig CC=gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to peterz from comment #13)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > (In reply to peterz from comment #9)
> > > Created attachment 51683 [details]
> > > kernel patch to test -mharden-sls=all
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102952
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Cooper ---
So this is the irritating corner case where the two options are linked.
*If* we are using -mindirect-branch-cs-prefix, then we intend to rewrite `jmp
__x86_indirect_thunk_*` to `jmp *%reg` or `lfence; jmp
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
