https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827
Bug ID: 102827
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error:
definition in block 20 does not dominate use in block
19)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39747
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
Bug 44415 depends on bug 39747, which changed state.
Bug 39747 Summary: Installation documentation should suggest building libgmp as
PIC for building with libjava
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39747
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102814
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #0)
> r12-4256 FAST
> r12- SLOW
>
> g++ -fpreprocessed -std=c++98 -O2 --param
> max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=NNN -c x.ii
Well, you are basically elid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102828
Bug ID: 102828
Summary: [12 Regression] ODR violation in
gimple-predicate-analysis.h since g:94c12ffac234
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102828
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102786
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f45610a45236e97616726ca042898d6ac46a082e
commit r12-4491-gf45610a45236e97616726ca042898d6ac46a082e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102816
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
Summary|[12 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102814
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1)
> Question to the larger audience... do we support bug reports against
> internal --param constructs?
Yes. Generally 'max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts' would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102817
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102819
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102814
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102823
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, I think I've seen this exact bug before. Note while 'int' and 'unsigned'
inter-operate wrt TBAA two structure types differing only in the signedness of
a _member_ do not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
Claudio Kozický changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claudiokozicky at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102825
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Comment #6 from Claudio Kozický ---
Created attachment 51628
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51628&action=edit
GCC version
This is the version of GCC with which I have reproduced the bug with.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102829
Bug ID: 102829
Summary: Redundant null check after atomic load from that
address
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4c18b98127087d7f14062b81bc678f0589cd36
commit r12-4493-g6b4c18b98127087d7f14062b81bc678f0589cd36
Author: prathamesh.kulkarni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The following reproduces the issue with -O -mavx -ftree-vectorize --param
ssa-name-def-chain-limit=0
The issue is that split_constant_offset doesn't see through the conversion
in that case and the vectoriz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
Claudio Kozický changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51628|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64888
--- Comment #8 from Claudio Kozický ---
Created attachment 51630
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51630&action=edit
GCC 11.1.0 preprocessed source
executed command: gcc -v -save-temps -fsanitize=undefined -fopenmp
minimal_exa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0
-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20211019 (experimental) [master r12-4491-gf45610a4523] (GCC)
[656] %
[656] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[657] %
[657] % gcctk -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91118
Claudio Kozický changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claudiokozicky at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102830
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 102830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102745
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3de82c6c36fea8fad7145b62ccb3a7c06d1f3c51
commit r11-9173-g3de82c6c36fea8fad7145b62ccb3a7c06d1f3c51
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102823
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Thank you! Added a link to upstream issue report:
https://github.com/g-truc/glm/pull/1087
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
Bug ID: 102831
Summary: [12 regression] Spurious -Wparentheses etc. warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102831
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102785
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f98359ba9d3775319fb3181009be7d3dafe9ba15
commit r12-4497-gf98359ba9d3775319fb3181009be7d3dafe9ba15
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102815
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You're doing it wrong.
gcc -Q --help=warnings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101635
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
--- Comment #11 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Well, that does help, although it is still a significant annoyance that would
take more than its fair share of time to handle.
(Also, is it still really that much of a concern anymore that users would thin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97046
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102086
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92284
Bug 92284 depends on bug 92189, which changed state.
Bug 92189 Summary: Fortran-written bind(C) function with allocatable argument
does not update C descriptor on exit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Even out-of-line does not help if there are visible CSE/association
> opportunities across such call.
Yeah, good point.
> A workaround is to make the out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d996799a507f9f4c379b55b004233be92fa63380
commit r12-4498-gd996799a507f9f4c379b55b004233be92fa63380
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101308
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101309
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102745
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
Bug ID: 102832
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_create_partial_epilog with
-O3 -msve-vector-bits=128
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #6)
> Generically (and if the command-line options are such that floating-point
> control / status bits are to be respected by optimizations), *any*
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102825
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9890b12c72c02828c691f22198c3e0afd8678991
commit r12-4500-g9890b12c72c02828c691f22198c3e0afd8678991
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102825
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833
Bug ID: 102833
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-17.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834
Bug ID: 102834
Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-pr96891-3.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 51632
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51632&action=edit
32-bit avx512f-pr96891-3.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102834
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835
Bug ID: 102835
Summary: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-trunchf.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836
Bug ID: 102836
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pieces-memset-1.c etc. FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102836
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> It turns out that this happens because 32-bit Solaris/x86 only guarantees
> 4-byte stack alignment following the i386 psABI, so defaults to
> -mstackrealign.
>
> Adding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
Bug ID: 102837
Summary: [12 regression] Many 32-bit gdc tests FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102837
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102375
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b34f5c5ec75823d656b6882f12d46248402a2aa
commit r12-4503-g6b34f5c5ec75823d656b6882f12d46248402a2aa
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102375
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102832
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102746
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Илья Шипицин from comment #9)
> ok, so we'll migrate to gcc-12 :)
Yes, but please wait for the release of 12.1 that will happen at the end of
April 2022.
In the meantime, you can port to GCC 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Bug ID: 102838
Summary: [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in
gomp_loop_ull_init
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
Bug ID: 102839
Summary: filesystem::path::wstring runs in C locale /
practically always throws
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Possibly triggered by enabling vectorization at -O2?
long long should for ia32 inside of structures (at least on linux but I think
it is the same for solaris too) have just 32-bit alignment and nothing else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102835
--- Comment #1 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>
> I wonder what's the best way to handle the difference? Just add
> -fomit-frame-pointer
> to the testcase or allow for the %ebp vs. %esp difference?
For this te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6920d5a1a2834e9c62d441b8f4c6186b01107d13
commit r12-4505-g6920d5a1a2834e9c62d441b8f4c6186b01107d13
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is the same issue as PR 95048 comment 3 describes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102839
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Martin, did you use -stdlib=libc++ with Clang? Otherwise you're just testing
> libstdc++ again with a different compiler.
I didn't, my bad. Will do it next tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Christian Fersch from comment #9)
> But is it possible to query the value of -fwide-exec-charset? I had quick
> look and couldn't find anything.
It's possible now: __GNUC_WIDE_EXECUTION_CHARS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93963
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
Bug ID: 102840
Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr22076.c by r12-4475
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 93183, which changed state.
Bug 93183 Summary: SVE does not use neg as conditional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 93183, which changed state.
Bug 93183 Summary: SVE does not use neg as conditional
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93183
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually no, I'm wrong, there is
gomp_mutex_t lock __attribute__((aligned (64)));
in the middle of the structure, so the start of the structure is 64-byte
aligned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102829
--- Comment #2 from Laurynas Biveinis ---
FWIW adding "if (this == nullptr) __builtin_unreachable();" between
__atomic_load_n and return fails to workaround this issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Bug ID: 102841
Summary: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/host_dat
a-7.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102841
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102833
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-19
CC|
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
