[Bug tree-optimization/102634] Optimization in dom2 pass makes wrong signed integer overflow inference

2021-10-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102634 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/98513] [10 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558

2021-10-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/102630] [12 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds with named address space

2021-10-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102630 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/102630] [12 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds with named address space

2021-10-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102630 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- A test case is below. Warnings for accesses at address zero are intentionally suppressed (to avoid false positives for unreachable code) but they are issued for accesses at nonzero offsets from null because

[Bug target/101804] float_vector_all_ones_operand should be used more

2021-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101804 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101761] Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc

2021-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/98442] [X86] suboptimal for memset with CLEAR_BY_PIECES

2021-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98442 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/90773] Improve piecewise operation

2021-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90773 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #20 from

[Bug target/102230] ICE in classify_argument, at config/i386/i386.c:2474

2021-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102230 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/102630] [12 Regression] Spurious -Warray-bounds with named address space

2021-10-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102630 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Section 25.8. Using FS and GS segments in user space applications in https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/x86/x86_64/fsgs.html makes it sound like null might be a valid address in a named address space. I

[Bug c++/102600] [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass evrp

2021-10-06 Thread johelegp at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600 --- Comment #2 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- A workaround: ```C++ export using byte = // Workaround GCC bug 102600. #if not defined(NDEBUG) or (defined(__clang__) or not defined(__GNUC__)) std::byte; #else unsigned char; #endif ```

[Bug other/102605] address instruction from -fdump-tree-*-gimple doesn't work with -fgimple

2021-10-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/101057] [gimplefe] GIMPLE frontend issues

2021-10-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101057 Bug 101057 depends on bug 102605, which changed state. Bug 102605 Summary: address instruction from -fdump-tree-*-gimple doesn't work with -fgimple https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605 What|Removed

[Bug target/101761] Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc

2021-10-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- Backport to gcc-11 needed

[Bug c++/102635] New: Wrong rejection of function default argument value depending on argument name

2021-10-06 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102635 Bug ID: 102635 Summary: Wrong rejection of function default argument value depending on argument name Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/101344] [11/12 Regression] braced-init-list not supported in an aggregate deduction

2021-10-06 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101344 --- Comment #8 from Fedor Chelnokov --- Thanks! Related discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/q/67280884/7325599

<    1   2