https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|Wrong code with -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a slightly more reduced testcase (without the reasonable values):
static inline const unsigned &max1(const unsigned &t, const unsigned &t1)
{
return t > t1 ? t : t1;
}
extern int var_20, var_22;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
So I took dgebal.f and ran delta on it to try and reduce it to something
manageable (I wish creduce worked on fortran files!) and got the following
which still shows us accessing above the stack.
SUBR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94853
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> (In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> > "-many" is supposed to make those black boxes just work. This worked before
> > recent changes to binutils/GC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102359
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:433516e1c6b1f8eeceeceb83cec5ea02a14065dc
commit r12-4200-g433516e1c6b1f8eeceeceb83cec5ea02a14065dc
Author: qing zhao
Date: Tue Oct 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102359
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.2.0
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> > > "-many" is supposed to make those black boxes just work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
Bug ID: 102625
Summary: [meta-bug] -mcmodel=large can't link
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
Ilya Konstantinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilya.konstantinov at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90698
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
For the purposes of clarifying the "lacks support" wording, where exactly does
the failure occur if one tries to enable it? That is, in which step?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
This affects musl's getcwd implementation, btw:
https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/unistd/getcwd.c?id=v1.2.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24)
> I wanted to look at #c20, but at least my i9-7960X for e.g. lock; btsl $65,
> var
> acts the same as lock; btsl $1, var rather than lock; btsl $1, var+8,
> so maybe #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98712
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
commit r12-4202-g09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102490
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
commit r12-4202-g09d886e671f2230acca082e6579a69b8df8fb202
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
>
> --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102626
Bug ID: 102626
Summary: [c++20] compiler crash when invoking constexpr
function in the constructor of template class
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
