https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102598
Bug ID: 102598
Summary: [modules] ICE in pp_string, at pretty-print.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgomp |tree-optimization
--- Comment #1 from J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33925
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102598
--- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
Attempts to reduce another wrong-code bug lead to this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #0)
> https://godbolt.org/z/aoab9W4xG
>
> This should all compile away, and test() should just be a single ret
> instruction. That is not what happens now, even w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
note I looked at master (trunk) and 11.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93148
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Also when looking at gfc_conv_subref_array_arg – the function is called
seemingly up to 3 times – once per:
* gfc_conv_loop_setup (&loop, &expr->where);
which calls gfc_conv_loop_setup → gfc_conv_loop_set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
hmm let me see if I can reproduce this (I didn't see it in my earlier tests):
.L41:
ud2
test():
ret
which would make things look somewhat strange indeed (the functions are all
TU-local - so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
Bug ID: 102599
Summary: Wrong simplification of inquiry parameters for complex
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93148
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Additionally, it seems as if the contiguous check used for
gfortran.dg/contiguous_10.f90 currently unconditionally copies in the data –
which causes a problem when the pointer address escapes.
(Okay, whether
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #26 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #25)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22)
> > Hmm, my proposed patch seems to work. I've adjusted it to not regress
> > previously correctly handled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102593
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://buildd.debian.org/s |
|tatus/fetch.php?pkg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #28 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21)
> Reduced testcase:
>
> int
> qy (void)
> {
> int tw = 4;
> int fb[tw];
> return fb[2];
> }
For this reduced testing case, if compiled with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51543|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600
Bug ID: 102600
Summary: [modules] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass
evrp
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185
Arjun Shankar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arjun.is at lostca dot se
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #11 from Thiago Macieira ---
$ for ((i=0;i<32;++i)); do ~/dev/gcc/bin/gcc "-DCONSTANT=(1<<$i)" -S -o - -O2
/tmp/test.cpp | grep bts; done
lock btsl $0, (%rdi)
lock btsl $1, (%rdi)
lock btsl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #12 from Thiago Macieira ---
Commit 7e0c0500808d58bca5b8e23cbd474022c32234e4 + your patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100427
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #5)
> actually a lot of dlls are not copied correctly.
>
> libstdc++-6.dll libatomic.dll libquadmath.dll libssp.dll are all copied with
> 32 bit dlls.
>
> And libgcc_seh.dll i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102601
Bug ID: 102601
Summary: [maybe not a bug] libgcc requires pthread.h even i use
--disable-thread --without-headers --disable-shared
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102601
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
In file included from ../../../../../../gcc/libgcc/gthr.h:148,
from ../../../../../../gcc/libgcc/libgcov-interface.c:27:
./gthr-default.h:35:10: fatal error: pthread.h: No such file or directory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102601
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51549|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102590
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102590
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||1997.rajatjain at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
>
> --- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
>
> >
> > > It removes a
> > > relation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102593
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102600
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
