https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99835
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Component|ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100220
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|missed optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84110
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I agree ECMAScript should treat NUL as an ordinary char. POSIX doesn't though:
"The interfaces specified in POSIX.1-2017 do not permit the inclusion of a NUL
character in an RE or in the string to be match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100359
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100221
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-25
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102482
Bug ID: 102482
Summary: Winit-list-lifetime false positive for temporaries
with std::initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102483
Bug ID: 102483
Summary: Regression in codegen of reduction of 4 chars
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62226
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> I am not sure whether the original issue still exists.
>
> Fortran now uses a lot of the common machinery and also seems to handle
> CPP() well.
>
> Thus,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102484
Bug ID: 102484
Summary: Refactor duplicated cb_cpp_diagnostic_cpp_option
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89040
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102483
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102377
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102358
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101136
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100444
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100990
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101124
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99942
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79539
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-25
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59267
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59267
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to James from comment #3)
> Sorry about having a second comment in a row, but I was playing a bit more
> with this, and using a string stream as solely an output stream doesn't
> appear to update
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59769
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This should be done in the C++ standard, not just as a libstdc++ extension.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
Bug ID: 102485
Summary: -Wa,-many no longer has any effect
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102462
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
I got a case3 from Wstringop-overflow-76.c
#define MAX(p, q) ((p) > (q) ? (p) : (q))
struct B4_B6
{
char b4[4];
char b6[6]; // { dg-message "at offset 6 into destination object 'b6'
of size 6" "note
28 matches
Mail list logo