[Bug libstdc++/102015] [missed optimization] Small memory overhead in _Rb_tree_impl (fix would require ABI break)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102015 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c/102148] New: ppc64le: homogeneous float arguments are not passed correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102148 Bug ID: 102148 Summary: ppc64le: homogeneous float arguments are not passed correctly Product: gcc Version: 8.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56985] gcc/fortran/resolve.c:920: "'%s' in cannot appear in COMMON ..."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug c++/92193] Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 92193, which changed state. Bug 92193 Summary: Poor diagnostics when a constexpr function call follows a failed static_assert https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92193 What|Removed

[Bug c++/55722] failed static_assert won't trigger a second time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55722 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/100950] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4cb3bb9ac11b4126ffa718287dd509a4b10a658 commit r12-3273-ge4cb3bb9ac11b4126ffa718287dd509a4b10a658 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/102149] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu Target Milestone: --- Seems to be a recent regression. $ gcc-trunk -v gcc version 12.0.0 20210831 (experimental) [master revision 5e57bacf6f3

[Bug tree-optimization/102149] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149 --- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang --- My bisection points to g:89f33f44addbf9853bc3e6677d

[Bug tree-optimization/102149] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/102149] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Started with r12-3222-g89f33f44addbf9853bc3e6677db1fa941713cb6c > but got fixed with r12-3250-g67927342290c61d7e054430f1d7a7281f1f97fae > So I think we just want

[Bug c++/36274] Please improve usage of template libs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36274 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- I think C++ modules will fix this.

[Bug c++/96286] Unhelpful errors after a failed static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96286 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug testsuite/51748] gcc.misc-tests/linkage.c fails on mips64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51748 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 51390 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51390&action=edit Patch

[Bug bootstrap/52847] "case" shell quoting problem in top-level makefile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52847 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/70242] GCC bootstrap failed on x86_64 using "--with-build-config=bootstrap-O3"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70242 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- I was able to do this on the trunk last week and it did not fail.

[Bug bootstrap/62009] [5 Regression] Bootstrap failure in vec.h::splice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62009 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Summ

[Bug bootstrap/89140] libiberty/pex-unix.c fails to compile in aarch64-to-x86_64 cross build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89140 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >the configure script for libiberty finds that getrusage is not available but >wait4 is. Both should be there.

[Bug rtl-optimization/102150] New: Speculative execution of inline assembly causes divide error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102150 Bug ID: 102150 Summary: Speculative execution of inline assembly causes divide error Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/94522] Enhancement request: asm goto with outputs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94522 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug inline-asm/59615] "asm goto" output or at least clobbered operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59615 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/102133] [12 Regression] ICE in set_rtl building libgcc __muldc3 for 32-bit SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102133 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:508fa61b6319377e48cbee98da221aacd475fd10 commit r12-3276-g508fa61b6319377e48cbee98da221aacd475fd10 Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Aug

[Bug middle-end/102133] [12 Regression] ICE in set_rtl building libgcc __muldc3 for 32-bit SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102133 --- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu --- Fixed in GCC12.

[Bug c/102151] New: Spurious warning by -Warray-bounds when allocating with flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102151 Bug ID: 102151 Summary: Spurious warning by -Warray-bounds when allocating with flexible array member Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c/102151] Spurious warning by -Warray-bounds when allocating with flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102151 Niibe Yutaka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gniibe at fsij dot org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c/102103] missing warning comparing array address to null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug tree-optimization/102151] Spurious warning by -Warray-bounds when allocating with flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102151 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I think the malloc needs to be at least the sizeof which is why it is complaining.

[Bug driver/49631] Driver --help should use common help code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49631 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-09-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/79357] Doubling a single complex float gives inefficient code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79357 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||101926 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug rtl-optimization/79858] Explain to translators what %smode means

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79858 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/102152] New: [12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in cprop_operand, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1715

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102152 Bug ID: 102152 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in cprop_operand, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1715 Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/102124] [11/12 Regression] -ftree-loop-vectorize Causing Data To Lose Sign Bit on AARCH64 Platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102124 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Chang --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Created attachment 51377 [details] > gcc12-pr102124.patch > > Untested fix. After applying this patch on GCC 11.2.1 code base, I re-built GCC on my AARCH64 box (

[Bug tree-optimization/102152] [12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in cprop_operand, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1715

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102152 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/102152] [12 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in cprop_operand, at tree-ssa-dom.c:1715

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102152 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug rtl-optimization/97856] Missed optimization: repeated call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97856 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. basic-block reordering decides to duplicate the block: Yes there are a few other bugs where we like to duplicate the return block I have seen too.

[Bug rtl-optimization/97856] Missed optimization: repeated call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97856 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/99591] Improving __builtin_add_overflow performance on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.3.0 Known to work|

[Bug target/99591] Improving __builtin_add_overflow performance on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Looks fixed for GCC 11+. signed2_overflow(short, short): .LFB0: .cfi_startproc addw%si, %di seto%al ret signed1_overflow

[Bug middle-end/102153] New: Better expansion of __builtin_*_overflow should be done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102153 Bug ID: 102153 Summary: Better expansion of __builtin_*_overflow should be done Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: internal-improvement,

[Bug tree-optimization/102149] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/102153] Better expansion of __builtin_*_overflow should be done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/102153] Better expansion of __builtin_*_overflow should be done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102153 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- So this will not fully be done as the way addv, etc. are defined to be jumps instead of sets. I will at least move internal-fn.c over to using emit_store_flag_force away from do_compare_rtx_and_jump . At l

[Bug middle-end/102153] Better expansion of __builtin_*_overflow should be done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102153 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug gcov-profile/96092] Should --coverage respect -ffile-prefix-map?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- I'm planning working on that in the next weeks.

<    1   2