https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101598
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101856
Bug ID: 101856
Summary: match_arith_overflow checks only
mulv4_optab/umulv4_optab tables when
smul_highpart_optab/umul_highpart_optab can produce
decent code too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101849
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
If you are using build_simple_mem_ref then the pointer type has to be
"correct",
but you can simply build the MEM_REF with build2 giving it the desired
access type - the pointer type is irrelevant. Note th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30314
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101857
Bug ID: 101857
Summary: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_3.F90 fails on
arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101858
Bug ID: 101858
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: ‘verify_gimple’ failed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101818
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101859
Bug ID: 101859
Summary: Misleading error message in designated initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101835
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101858
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-11
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101860
Bug ID: 101860
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1199
since r12-2837-g50b5877925ef5ae8
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101860
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101860
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Similarly fails:
$ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v32hi.c
-Og -mavx512vp2intersect
during GIMPLE pass: fre
/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/vshuf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101857
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101861
Bug ID: 101861
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE (segfault) via
tree-vect-stmts.c:9495's vectorizable_load
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101857
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Yes I still see that with r12-2842. There were link errors before r12-2839, but
now only this test fails, at execution time. There might be something about
raising exception in soft floating-point mode?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101861
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so we're having memory_access_type == VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER, gs_info.ifn !=
IFN_LAST but STMT_VINFO_GATHER_SCATTER_P is false. It looks like vec_offset is
set elsewhere in that case. Likely here:
els
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101860
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51286
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51286&action=edit
gcc12-pr101860.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101862
Bug ID: 101862
Summary: [C, C++] Potential '?:' diagnostic for always-true
expressions in boolean context
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60932
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8f604da25bfe0fd4dadbc338293885819fe8018
commit r12-2848-gb8f604da25bfe0fd4dadbc338293885819fe8018
Author: prathamesh.kulkarn
king-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210811 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101863
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101861
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f19c70afa4aa2416c581484a6eb51c0ac46acd08
commit r12-2849-gf19c70afa4aa2416c581484a6eb51c0ac46acd08
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101861
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
So the solution won't be so easy. We generally face the problem that:
voidfoo (void) __attribute__
((target_clones("avx512f,avx2,avx,default")));
is only a declaration. If we consider anot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101845
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101858
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7e91f4894f6a1a2daeec5cbe1e912bb896b9f7a
commit r12-2850-gd7e91f4894f6a1a2daeec5cbe1e912bb896b9f7a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101788
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
What forwprop does is
[local count: 1073741824]:
__asm__ __volatile__("" : "=w" y);
- y.0_1 = y;
- _6 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
- _7 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
- _8 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
- _9 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
- _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61810
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Re-running the experiment of disabling init-regs on x86_64 on trunk shows
+FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr48622 c_lto_pr48622_0.o-c_lto_pr48622_0.o link, -O -flto
-fi
nline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining
FAIL: gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Right now, the x86-64* are defined as aliases to k8:
>
> {"x86-64", PROCESSOR_K8, CPU_K8, PTA_X86_64_BASELINE, 0, P_NONE},
> {"x86-64-v2", PROCESSOR_K8, CPU_GENERI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> It is very difficult to add them to __builtin_cpu_is since there are no
> such processors.
I see!
> However, add them to __builtin_cpu_supports is possible.
Please do so we can then leverage that in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 51290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51290&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> This patch breaks MinGW, see PR 101779
But it can be fixed by:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28207
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63758bead0337b5225016711bf9d540cf7cc80b1
commit r11-8845-g63758bead0337b5225016711bf9d540cf7cc80b1
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97001
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea32f15d44e4f50f3eb9deb3135e0b6d50f7ec43
commit r11-8846-gea32f15d44e4f50f3eb9deb3135e0b6d50f7ec43
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:546cf317558bfb178b7cadd346bb43cb963e9ce6
commit r11-8848-g546cf317558bfb178b7cadd346bb43cb963e9ce6
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5f17274aabe61bb0193b8b68283c1f1da5ee699
commit r11-8849-gc5f17274aabe61bb0193b8b68283c1f1da5ee699
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bde28c60c70079416dd2181f882c0694e019eaef
commit r11-8850-gbde28c60c70079416dd2181f882c0694e019eaef
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101258
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100828
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90f3dd128bc709a76c52b5ae29b40903acb26f20
commit r11-8851-g90f3dd128bc709a76c52b5ae29b40903acb26f20
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100828
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 100828, which changed state.
Bug 100828 Summary: Arbitrary limit on constraint complexity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100828
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:452bfa3f41733eed6f07e5a8aae0bb8214cc6ce6
commit r10-10029-g452bfa3f41733eed6f07e5a8aae0bb8214cc6ce6
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f28d0e3a39246767b5fcdbe5c2bc005a45253246
commit r10-10030-gf28d0e3a39246767b5fcdbe5c2bc005a45253246
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86bdcd21a1be008df28648b185c12221d917a166
commit r10-10031-g86bdcd21a1be008df28648b185c12221d917a166
Author: Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101864
Bug ID: 101864
Summary: Segmentation fault with -Wtraditional + glibc 2.34
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101864
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101638
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101862
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101638
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101845
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101529
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 101845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99351
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101865
Bug ID: 101865
Summary: _ARCH_PWR8 is not defined when using -mcpu=power8
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
Bug ID: 101866
Summary: libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/random/randint.cc
fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee9e57684e27d27ff12e2b93ab7ae3d46861593
commit r11-8852-g4ee9e57684e27d27ff12e2b93ab7ae3d46861593
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If the 32 bits read from /dev/random by reseed() happen to equal 99u then
there's a 100% chance that the values will be the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101866
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101564
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89062
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6186708312780bb2139da01946abdde39667e985
commit r12-2859-g6186708312780bb2139da01946abdde39667e985
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79501
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e39d1a15f5276f72ee478a692445569bb646e65
commit r12-2860-g7e39d1a15f5276f72ee478a692445569bb646e65
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101786
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee8f9ff00d79998274c967ad0c23692be9dd3ada
commit r12-2861-gee8f9ff00d79998274c967ad0c23692be9dd3ada
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Kneifel ---
Yes, but a programmer might choose to implement target clones for a shared
library using another language, e.g. hand-optimized assembler code (this was
the actual problem I had).
Forbidding target_clone de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89062
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79501
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101865
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101853
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101867
Bug ID: 101867
Summary: avr libc build error for libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-01 03:42:59 |2021-8-11
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100919
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100919
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
4.1.2 issues a duplicated warning too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94492
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101867
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at magfr dot
user.lysator.liu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40075
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The original testcase in comment #0 starts to have the message in GCC 9+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101867
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> How did you run configure?
../gcc/configure --disable-nls --disable-werror --disable-libstdcxx-verbose
--enable-libstdc++ --disable-ssp --enable-languages=c,c++ --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101725
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9707d2e5dbb92d2bc990c922461a5a16ae652319
commit r12-2862-g9707d2e5dbb92d2bc990c922461a5a16ae652319
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95302
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95302
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shyou...@ruby-lang.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101867
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 51293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51293&action=edit
config file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101867
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 51294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51294&action=edit
end part of error messages
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
