https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101668
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
> it looks like there's no V8SI->V8DI conversion optab or we choose V4DI
> for some other reason as prefered vector mode.
We have, just need to add -mprefer-vector-width=512, the we'll get
bar_s32_s64:
vp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84583
Boris Kolpackov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|preprocessor|c++
Version|7.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210
commit r12-2592-gf0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210
Author: Haochen Gui
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
--- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The user I'm most worried about is stor-layout.c:place_field which
> uses multiple_of_p to optimize DECL_OFFSET_ALIGN, where losing that
> might have severe impact on Ada.
Indeed, this might measurably i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
And the DOM copy has been split out to refs_same_for_tbaa_p, now also used
by RTL CSE and DSE (which do the same transform), see the fix for PR93946.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669
--- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Similar to what Richard said, tested with gdb, use -gdwarf-4 with trunk, the
msg also disappears.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
With union punning we've basically opened up a way to change the dynamic type
of storage in a way that expects us from generating no code from a "virtual"
read-write cycle involving the previous and the nex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Just some more brain-dumps from thinking about a fix.
- we can annotate the alias_set_entry with a flag whether it was created for
a union type and use that to improve the logic
- we can introduce some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101659
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I already see some "__glibcxx_assert(this->_M_is_engaged());" in the code,
which IIUC should be enabled by _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS (and a fortiori by
_GLIBCXX_DEBUG). Did you actually try it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101616
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Matt Jacobson from comment #3)
> As it happens, I'm targeting the NeXT v2 runtime, but I'm *not* actually
> targeting Darwin. So `flag_next_runtime` is just 1 for me--not an OS
> version value l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This is weird. There is no .debug_loc section with DWARF 5 at all, only
.debug_loclists.
I don't see any complains from readelf:
readelf --debug-dump=loc pr101669 >/dev/null
(binutils 2.36.1).
And no errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671
Bug ID: 101671
Summary: pr83510 fails because threader confuses -Warray-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672
Bug ID: 101672
Summary: d: Allow use of classes without the runtime if they
only contain static members
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101673
Bug ID: 101673
Summary: shorter unprofitable jump thread path inhibits
threading of larger path
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674
Bug ID: 101674
Summary: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c fails after jump threading
rewrite
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101675
Bug ID: 101675
Summary: analyzer/pr94851-2.c marked XFAIL because it fails
with new jump threader
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod ---
> .. but still doesn't generate 'vector code' for the example shown here.
Actually, it does. I was looking in the wrong place.
compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210729 (experimental) (GCC)
$ make
gnatmake -gnatVa -gnata -O1 -ftree-vrp src/egl-objects-displays.adb
gcc -c -Isrc/ -gnatVa -gnata -O1 -ftree-vrp -I- src/egl-objects-displays.adb
gcc -c -Isrc/ -gnatVa -gnata -O1 -ftree-vrp -I- src/egl.adb
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101667
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Works on 11.2.1 as well:
tor:~/tmp/tree-vrp-test$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/notnfs/aldyh/bld/threader/ada/install/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.2.1/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81596
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101659
Simon Marchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101659
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Indeed. Marc added them in r8-711.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101659
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It might be nice to add them to std::experimental::optional too though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101647
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d014f7b224cb41e9570284d125f4c605cb0ab0a
commit r12-2594-g7d014f7b224cb41e9570284d125f4c605cb0ab0a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101676
Bug ID: 101676
Summary: ^ not changed to | if the non-zero don't overlap
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101543
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101543
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609
Tejas Belagod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101665
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340
Matt Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot
gov
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101656
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd4bda42979cb40860a9cd2c0ed188b9a0948cd4
commit r12-2595-gcd4bda42979cb40860a9cd2c0ed188b9a0948cd4
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101657
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75f2e3f6cbbb79421b12e399498e9c14241359e7
commit r12-2596-g75f2e3f6cbbb79421b12e399498e9c14241359e7
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c9b7408dc578cb2ae142a5c1b724c183497bdb2
commit r12-2597-g5c9b7408dc578cb2ae142a5c1b724c183497bdb2
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7616ed6307c90b5bbf1bf53550d33cc674ab4b6f
commit r12-2598-g7616ed6307c90b5bbf1bf53550d33cc674ab4b6f
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c13cf479ba81c4d29b202e9b8c6a7f0031a8b20
commit r12-2599-g3c13cf479ba81c4d29b202e9b8c6a7f0031a8b20
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:22589586940439fb5878180a7c586ea753d179f6
commit r11-8816-g22589586940439fb5878180a7c586ea753d179f6
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a3f1c2402c87533d38e1016fcf842a5493e8806
commit r11-8817-g0a3f1c2402c87533d38e1016fcf842a5493e8806
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10490b7a453159f9b602b7f273f0aa6b4caebca7
commit r10-10012-g10490b7a453159f9b602b7f273f0aa6b4caebca7
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c848c0ec7fab0c0a220683ad234c8842939941cf
commit r9-9653-gc848c0ec7fab0c0a220683ad234c8842939941cf
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by William Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:868cb29b1ddebc4128e9e4b84d92f4473aa3389c
commit r11-8818-g868cb29b1ddebc4128e9e4b84d92f4473aa3389c
Author: Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101657
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101656
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by William Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e925336ec309e581317f9b198207db915402b83f
commit r10-10013-ge925336ec309e581317f9b198207db915402b83f
Author: Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by William Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49a2cbb3f5906ac20d7a4619d5d3112584d46cf7
commit r9-9654-g49a2cbb3f5906ac20d7a4619d5d3112584d46cf7
Author: Bill Schmidt
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target|ppc64*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #10)
> Query from someone who I believe just encountered this trying to build 11.2
> on macOS 11.5.1 with XCode 12.5: What is the best method to work around this
> for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0)
> C++ constructors return void, even though the front-end semantic treats them
> as implicitly returning `this'.
But on some targets they actually do return this.
Y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1)
> I can confirm the test fails (despite the xfail):
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line
> 25)
>
> The xfail target sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0)
> > C++ constructors return void, even though the front-end semantic treats them
> > as implicitly returning `this'.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101677
Bug ID: 101677
Summary: [11 Regression] Concept with use of incomplete type
succeeds on GCC 10.3.0, fails on GCC 11 onward
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101670
Joe Loser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joeloser93 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f6bdd51cfe15403085b69c133065ebda4af9bb9
commit r12-2600-g2f6bdd51cfe15403085b69c133065ebda4af9bb9
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Yeah, that would be great. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:05 PM msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671
>
> Martin Sebor changed:
>
>What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
What version of gdb are you using?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101627
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101678
Bug ID: 101678
Summary: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71538
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101171
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93574
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101171
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||changochen1 at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92428
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpotapov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-09 00:00:00 |2021-7-29
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89932
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually this one has been fixed while PR 67694 has not.
THis is a dup of bug 97882.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 97882 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #9 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edwin+bugs at etorok dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
--- Comment #5 from Matt Thompson ---
Iain,
The Linux system would be SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3. The macOS system
is macOS 11.5.1.
On the Linux machine, I can confirm the error with (I only have some versions
of GCC available):
* 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hristo at venev dot name
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101679
Bug ID: 101679
Summary: duplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant
string
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641
--- Comment #5 from Martin Uecker ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
>
> What we know from the union read is that the dynamic type is either the
> union type (so the read can pun) or the dynamic type is the union member
> type (the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Weird memory corruption |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101517
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16230
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43495
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11] Pointless: Array|[10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98076
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.3|---
--- Comment #3 from anlau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65573
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vladimir.kokovic at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97824
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vladimir.kokovic at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65568
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo