[Bug target/100152] [10 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] used |[10 Regression] used |c

[Bug tree-optimization/46306] inefficient code generated for array accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/101466] Optimizers should fold bounds checking for -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101466 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, unlvsur at live dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101466 > > --- Comment #13 from cqwrteur --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)

[Bug debug/101473] debug_line info depends on toolchain path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, tonyb at cybernetics dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 > > --- Comment #12 from tonyb at cybernetics dot com --- > The patch fixed my own

[Bug tree-optimization/45522] PRE misses oppurtunity for statement folding.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- So the testcase in comment #5 I think the problem is we can't figure out _messages[err] == ((void *) 0 is false.

[Bug tree-optimization/45522] PRE misses oppurtunity for statement folding.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/53806] Missed optimization (a<=b)&&(a>=b) with trapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53806 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug target/101484] [12 Regression] trunk 20210717 ftbfs for amdgcn-amdhsa (gcn offload)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101484 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8168338684fc2bed576bb09202c63b3e9e678d92 commit r12-2408-g8168338684fc2bed576bb09202c63b3e9e678d92 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/60001] VRP fails to fold identical unsigned comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60001 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/95102] missed if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95102 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > One thing that should be done: > if (_1 < a_4(D)) > goto ; [50.00%] > else > goto ; [50.00%] > >[local count: 536870913]: > x_5 = BIT_INSERT_E

[Bug tree-optimization/85636] Tree if-conversion inserts redundant loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85636 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.1.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/63202] tree vectorizer does not make use of alignment information from VRP/CCP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63202 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/45522] PRE misses oppurtunity for statement folding.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/95986] Partial specialization of class template is not found when class template has NTTP of class type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95986 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid W E Brown changed:

[Bug tree-optimization/69489] missed vectorization for boolean loop, missed if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69489 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/72443] VRP derives poor range for "y = (int)x + C;" when x has an anti-range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72443 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-07-26 00:00:00 |2021-7-20 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/57650] Suboptimal code after TRUTH_AND_EXPR is changed into BIT_AND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57650 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/95948] memmove error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95948 --- Comment #3 from Vasily Khramushin --- Thank you, I agree. Just created my own algorithm to solve a particular problem. The standard function is correct of course.

[Bug sanitizer/100878] enabling UBSAN leads to false positive `'this' pointer is null` when casting lambda to function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100878 --- Comment #1 from Ed Catmur --- Per godbolt, this appears to be fixed on trunk: https://godbolt.org/z/xxz8ecxzK g++ (Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-48e8a7a677b8356df946cd12fbb215538828e747-binutils-2.36.1) 12.0.0 20210707 (experimental)

[Bug debug/101473] debug_line info depends on toolchain path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/92538] Proposal for IPA init() constant propagation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92538 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/101523] New: Huge number of combine attempts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523 Bug ID: 101523 Summary: Huge number of combine attempts Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/101512] [11/12 Regression] ICE in maybe_trim_constructor_store, at tree-ssa-dse.c:379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-20 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug rtl-optimization/101523] Huge number of combine attempts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel --- This appears to be triggered by try_combine unnecessarily setting back the position by returning the i2 insn. When 866 is inserted into 973 866 still needs to be kept around for other users. So try_combin

[Bug middle-end/93437] [9 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on protobuf generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437 Konstantin Kharlamov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/101523] Huge number of combine attempts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 51174 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51174&action=edit Experimental Fix With that patch the number of combine attempts goes back to normal.

[Bug middle-end/92718] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus Wstringop-overflow in __builtin_memset() of an element of array of size 1 of struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92718 Konstantin Kharlamov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru --- Com

[Bug fortran/101514] ICE: out of memory allocating 18446744073709551600 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/101516] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug middle-end/92718] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus Wstringop-overflow in __builtin_memset() of an element of array of size 1 of struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92718 --- Comment #9 from Konstantin Kharlamov --- Omg, I am sorry, please ignore my comment. For some incomprehensible reason bugzilla circles through bug entries upon sending a comment. My comment here was supposed for another report, but then appare

[Bug middle-end/101521] -ftrapv should become something like -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101521 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/101521] -ftrapv should become something like -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101521 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/101524] New: Improve diagnostic for incorrect definition of namespace alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101524 Bug ID: 101524 Summary: Improve diagnostic for incorrect definition of namespace alias Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug debug/101473] debug_line info depends on toolchain path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cc2df084b7977653a9b59cbc34a9ad500ae619c commit r12-2412-g7cc2df084b7977653a9b59cbc34a9ad500ae619c Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug debug/101473] debug_line info depends on toolchain path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- I'm interested if remaining differences are due to the same underlying issue or not, so I'm for now leaving this PR open (it's too late to backport for 11.2 but could be backported for 11.3 though it isn't

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #1 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Madhu from comment #0) > cppreference.com states > > ``` > bool create_directory( const std::filesystem::path& p ); > > Creates the directory p as if by POSIX mkdir() with a second argume

[Bug c++/101516] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/101516] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|10.4

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c4ae4ff46b1d7633f1e06f57d348b5817b8f640 commit r12-2413-g0c4ae4ff46b1d7633f1e06f57d348b5817b8f640 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've added tests to verify that the behaviour is correct, and those tests pass with all versions of GCC.

[Bug c++/101516] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51175 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51175&action=edit gcc12-pr101516.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/101516] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in finish_omp_reduction_clause, at cp/semantics.c:6075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Priority|

[Bug c/101525] New: "out of the bounds" warning for an Innocuous memset call with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101525 Bug ID: 101525 Summary: "out of the bounds" warning for an Innocuous memset call with LTO Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101526] New: Improve diagnostic for trailing comma in base-clause in class-head

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101526 Bug ID: 101526 Summary: Improve diagnostic for trailing comma in base-clause in class-head Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug c++/101519] Improve diagnostic for template name used as base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101519 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See also PR 101526 which requests another improvement to the same diagnostic, but with a different cause.

[Bug ipa/101066] [10/11/12 Regression] Wrong code after fixup_cfg3 since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5aa28c8cf15cd254cc5a3a12278133b93b8b017f commit r10-9993-g5aa28c8cf15cd254cc5a3a12278133b93b8b017f Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug ipa/101066] [10/11/12 Regression] Wrong code after fixup_cfg3 since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/101527] New: The implementation of std::common_iterator::operator== seems to be wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101527 Bug ID: 101527 Summary: The implementation of std::common_iterator::operator== seems to be wrong Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c++/101526] Improve diagnostic for trailing comma in base-clause in class-head

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101526 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug middle-end/93437] [9 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on protobuf generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |10.0 Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 93437, which changed state. Bug 93437 Summary: [9 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on protobuf generated code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437 What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/101528] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Bug ID: 101528 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug testsuite/101506] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/vect-fmaxv-fminv-compile.c fail after gcc-12-2292-g1dd3f2109585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101506 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ef9b135793a528c05c4a3e22649744955aa2dfb commit r12-2414-g1ef9b135793a528c05c4a3e22649744955aa2dfb Author: Richard Sandiford D

[Bug target/101384] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -Og and above with vector shift/multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc386b020869ad0095cf58f8c76a40ea457e7a2c commit r11-8789-gdc386b020869ad0095cf58f8c76a40ea457e7a2c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/101506] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/vect-fmaxv-fminv-compile.c fail after gcc-12-2292-g1dd3f2109585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101506 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug target/101384] [9/10/12 Regression] wrong code at -Og and above with vector shift/multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|11.1.1 |11.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89ec3b67dbe856a447d068b053bc19559f136f43 commit r12-2415-g89ec3b67dbe856a447d068b053bc19559f136f43 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101384] [9/10/12 Regression] wrong code at -Og and above with vector shift/multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0e82856d535f56c916382f892ed2435dde54d4d commit r12-2416-ge0e82856d535f56c916382f892ed2435dde54d4d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/101529] New: wrong code with __builtin_convertvector() and __builtin_shufflevector() at -Og

0154202-g1ef9b135793-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210720 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/101530] New: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed: non-top-level 'bit_field_ref' with __builtin_shufflevector()[0]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101530 Bug ID: 101530 Summary: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed: non-top-level 'bit_field_ref' with __builtin_shufflevector()[0] Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101384] [9/10 Regression] wrong code at -Og and above with vector shift/multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #5 from Madhu --- * "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:46:32 + > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 > > --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- > (In reply to Madhu from comment #0) >> cp

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #256 from Larkin Nickle --- Created attachment 51179 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51179&action=edit Configure log for gcc 11.1.0

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #257 from Larkin Nickle --- Created attachment 51180 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51180&action=edit Build log for GCC 11.1 with -j1

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #258 from Larkin Nickle --- I've now attached the configure log as well as the build log for GCC 11.1 with `-j1` passed to make so as to make the log more readable.

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #7 from Madhu --- * "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:00:55 + >> I was going by the usage from databasePath() in >> https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/main/Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/ >> WebStorage/Loc

[Bug middle-end/101530] ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed: non-top-level 'bit_field_ref' with __builtin_shufflevector()[0]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101530 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think you are still confused between the bool that crate_directory returns, and the bool that you get from !ec The bool that is returned tells you if a new directory was created. The bool you get from

[Bug testsuite/101531] New: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531 Bug ID: 101531 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #9 from Madhu --- * "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:25:44 + > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 > > --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- > I think you are still confused between th

[Bug c++/101532] New: [12 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532 Bug ID: 101532 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:859 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/101533] New: ICE in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:25988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101533 Bug ID: 101533 Summary: ICE in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:25988 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c/101534] New: ICE in create_tailcall_accumulator, at tree-tailcall.c:1083

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101534 Bug ID: 101534 Summary: ICE in create_tailcall_accumulator, at tree-tailcall.c:1083 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/99400] OpenMP: ICE in install_var_field, at omp-low.c:789 with "map(alloc: A) map(to: A)"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99400 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #1 from G.

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #11 from Madhu --- sorry for the typos in my last message - i should've proofread - but they should be fairly obvious. ( I wrote "p" instead of p, and fff instead of xxx, etc.) I think my initial problem remains

[Bug testsuite/100167] GCC configured for power10 fails the gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-longlong.c test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100167 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fcb33455c9dc9359d98cd6bffe7f32f282ed713 commit r12-2417-g7fcb33455c9dc9359d98cd6bffe7f32f282ed713 Author: Michael Meissner Dat

[Bug c++/101532] [12 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Jonatha

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Madhu from comment #11) > I think my initial problem remains Well your "initial problem" was talking exclusively about create_directory, which works perfectly. There is a problem is a **dif

[Bug fortran/101535] New: ICE in lookup_decl, at omp-low.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101535 Bug ID: 101535 Summary: ICE in lookup_decl, at omp-low.c:412 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/101532] [12 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:859

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/101536] New: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101536 Bug ID: 101536 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7324 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/101536] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7324

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101536 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #259 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-07-19 5:00 p.m., me at larbob dot org wrote: > I've now tried 11.1.0 almost exactly as The Written Word builds it, and still > get: > > during GIMPLE pass: dce > ../../libiberty/mkstemp

[Bug libstdc++/101510] std::filesystem::create_directory on an existing symlink to a directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510 --- Comment #14 from Madhu --- * "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:59:20 + > Well your "initial problem" was talking exclusively about > create_directory, which works perfectly. > > There is a problem is a **different**

[Bug fortran/101535] ICE in lookup_decl, at omp-low.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101535 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/61577] [4.9.0 Regression] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 --- Comment #260 from Larkin Nickle --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #259) > The compiler being used to compile mkstemps.c is broken.  If core dumps are > enabled, > you should be able to use gdb (wdb) directly to find the illegal instru

[Bug c++/38522] -Wconversion does not handle complex bitwise expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522 Tomasz Konojacki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||me at xenu dot pl --- Comment #10 fro

[Bug testsuite/101531] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/53277] -Wconversion cannot handle compound expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277 Tomasz Konojacki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||me at xenu dot pl --- Comment #17 fro

[Bug c++/93652] -Wconversion gives false warning with bitwise operations on reference types returned from function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652 Tomasz Konojacki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||me at xenu dot pl --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/93652] -Wconversion gives false warning with bitwise operations on reference types returned from function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/53277] -Wconversion cannot handle compound expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277 --- Comment #18 from Tomasz Konojacki --- Sorry, it still warns in C mode, but it doesn't in C++.

[Bug c++/38522] -Wconversion does not handle complex bitwise expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/53277] -Wconversion cannot handle compound expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- For C++ the comment 15 case seems to have been fixed by r10-6527: c++: Use constexpr to avoid wrong -Wsign-compare (PR90691). We would like to do constexpr evaluation to avoid false positives on

[Bug c++/101537] New: -Wconversion false positive in ternary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537 Bug ID: 101537 Summary: -Wconversion false positive in ternary Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

  1   2   3   >