https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Comment on attachment 51142 [details]
> A patch
>
> Can't you use one single local_cpu_detect and pass it 2 arguments (arch/tune
> and 32/64) instead of just one (arc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod ---
yeah, it because we have been treating casts to objects of the same precision
as equivalences.This normally works fine, but in this case we have
c_9 = (int)_2 c_9 == _2
_3 = c_9 - 10 so _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51142|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51144
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51144&action=edit
gcc12-pr101419.patch
Updated patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91050
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101199
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101402
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51851
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code with -O2: |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Just for the record, started with r9-2475-g4864297f7858617a.
That definitely looks more like it was exposing the issue really as that was to
VRP while the fix in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101415
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101397
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101411
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d4393af9d2b37b78eb5b1f84f5d4da3a6f7fba6
commit r12-2257-g9d4393af9d2b37b78eb5b1f84f5d4da3a6f7fba6
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101411
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60669
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1539b797a06e03b08e1f1de28ad0d19a3956616
commit r12-2258-ga1539b797a06e03b08e1f1de28ad0d19a3956616
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d980e84240c82502661758fbecd5f456018ea89
commit r12-2259-g8d980e84240c82502661758fbecd5f456018ea89
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao ---
This issue still exists in trunk. "-fno-builtin-abort" can be used as a
workaround for SpiderMonkey though.
Any progress?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96697
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > Shall we do that as a specific matcher or e.g. in the ranger once it gets
> > code for symbolic comparisons? I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
commit r12-2260-g8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79501
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
commit r12-2260-g8d75b8830e9dafb4e0c400c723653512adf40295
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
Bug ID: 101429
Summary: __replacement_assert should be marked as noexcept
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
By the way, i think if _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE==0, it should be just an
__builtin_abort(). This will make optimizers much happier. The bounds checking
will be only once.
https://godbolt.org/z/7MxMoe3Yn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101361
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101407
--- Comment #4 from Toolybird ---
Your patch solves the problem for me. Thank you very much!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101430
Bug ID: 101430
Summary: Passing a lambda as a template argument causes
internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #10 from Hongyu Wang ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Created attachment 51143 [details]
> A patch
>
> Try this instead.
This also works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88252
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93086
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 51145
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51145&action=edit
Patch in test
This patch is bigger than I wanted it to be as there has been many more uses of
build_nonstandard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101431
Bug ID: 101431
Summary: gcc-generated DWARF5 .debug_line directory entries
violate the DWARF5 spec
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101431
--- Comment #1 from roc at ocallahan dot org ---
Clang follows the spec (clang 12, -fdebug-default-version=5):
The Directory Table:
0 /tmp/pernosco-submit-test
1 out
The File Name Table
Entry Dir TimeSizeMD5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100166
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063eba7ca73030139a3bf822ed127cf09b2fc226
commit r12-2266-g063eba7ca73030139a3bf822ed127cf09b2fc226
Author: Michael Meissner
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92505
Christopher Di Bella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cjdb.ns at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101432
Bug ID: 101432
Summary: NULL dereferences aren't assumed to be unreachable
even with -fdelete-null-pointer-checks
-fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101275
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18a463bb666cc8f3421589e7641ec617acb84741
commit r12-2268-g18a463bb666cc8f3421589e7641ec617acb84741
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Fri Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101275
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101429
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #1)
> By the way, i think if _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE==0, it should be just an
> __builtin_abort(). This will make optimizers much happier. The bounds
> checking will be only once.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-10-26 00:00:00 |2021-7-13
Known to fail|10.2.0
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo