https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Maybe for that we just have to use the result of the call in the
> non-throwing case.
That seems to block the hoisting in all cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101403
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f5fbb550af7d9d6cb56ae8f607fea0eccaa9295
commit r12-2238-g5f5fbb550af7d9d6cb56ae8f607fea0eccaa9295
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
Avi Kivity changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #3)
> Adding Iain since the ICE happens in a coroutine. Meanwhile my desktop is
> reducing the testcase.
do you have a backtrace?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101390
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #5 from Avi Kivity ---
How does one ask gcc to generate a backtrace on ICE?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101426
Bug ID: 101426
Summary: Wrong code redirecting IPA thunk parms to tail-call
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98435
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e72c24d2f3b1427f5e117e371928e7af50d2036
commit r12-2239-g1e72c24d2f3b1427f5e117e371928e7af50d2036
Author: prathamesh.kulkarni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101403
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another question is whether we shouldn't extend the short_shift stuff in
build_binary_op also to COMPOUND_EXPRs with INTEGER_CST on the ultimate rhs.
unsigned int f1 (unsigned short x) { return x >> 12; }
un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |sanitizer
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #5)
> How does one ask gcc to generate a backtrace on ICE?
It produces one when libbacktrace is available, not aware of needing to do
anything special; is there any other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101426
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 51136
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51136&action=edit
Experimental Fix
With this patch the address is copied to a pseudo first. That way the register
allocator wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #7 from Avi Kivity ---
ice.cc: In member function 'seastar::future<>
table::generate_and_propagate_view_updates(const schema_ptr&, reader_permit,
std::vector&&, mutation&&, flat_mutation_reader_opt,
tracing::trace_state_ptr, gc_clock
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #8 from Avi Kivity ---
Ugh, I forgot g++ isn't the compiler proper and setting a breakpoint is going
to be tricky.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #9 from Avi Kivity ---
I found -dH and have a core:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f26600e02a2 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f26600c98a4 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00ff1af4 in diagnostic_action_after_output(diagno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101427
Bug ID: 101427
Summary: std::get should refuse to compile if type is provided
and it is duplicated in std::tuple
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so the issue is that there's no scalar trapping operation but
gimple_could_trap_p returns true for the internal function calls used by
SLP pattern recog, in this case .VEC_ADDSUB. gimple_could_trap_p_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
> > Maybe for that we just have to use the result of the call in the
> > non-throwing case.
>
> That seems to block the hoisting in all cases.
function Bar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #10 from Avi Kivity ---
Reproduces on trunk:
#7 0x00b439af in cp_build_modify_expr (loc=1376651745,
lhs=0x7f0c55c12c60, modifycode=, rhs=0x7f0c55e63ee0,
complain=) at ../../gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c:8919
8919
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51137
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51137&action=edit
patch
I am testing this patch which fixes the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #10)
> Reproduces on trunk:
>
> #7 0x00b439af in cp_build_modify_expr (loc=1376651745,
> lhs=0x7f0c55c12c60, modifycode=, rhs=0x7f0c55e63ee0,
> complain=) at ../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Summary|collapsing memse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11)
> (In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #10)
> > Reproduces on trunk:
> this looks like a dup of PR 96056 - but I am happy to check the reduced case.
erm PR 98056 I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #13 from Avi Kivity ---
The coroutine that breaks is
future<> table::generate_and_propagate_view_updates(const schema_ptr& base,
reader_permit permit,
std::vector&& views,
mutation&& m,
flat_mutation_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
> function Bar (A : access Integer; N : Integer) return Integer is
> Ret : Integer := 0;
> Ret2 : Integer := 0;
> begin
> if N /= 0 then
> Ret2 := Foo (N);
> Ret := A.all;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #14 from Avi Kivity ---
Very likely it's a dup:
db::view::view_update_builder builder = co_await
db::view::make_view_update_builder(
base,
std::move(views),
flat_mutation_reader_from_mutations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #15 from Avi Kivity ---
If I move the sub-expression that contains the std::initializer_list outside
co_await, the internal error is avoided.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #16 from Avi Kivity ---
So I confirm it's a dup. Are you still interested in a reduced testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101428
Bug ID: 101428
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: 'asm' clobber conflict with
output operand
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98056
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
*** Bug 101420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101420
--- Comment #18 from Avi Kivity ---
It's still >7MB long, so I'll stop reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Started with r9-2635-g78ea9abc2018243af7f7ada6135144ac90c6ad27
> I wonder if objsz pass when insert_min_max_p shouldn't in addition to adding
> MIN_EXPR or MAX_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101421
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Just for the record, started with r9-2475-g4864297f7858617a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101398
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101343
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b8b37d1b6301855213b8d4860feaeb74d464c6b
commit r12-2240-g9b8b37d1b6301855213b8d4860feaeb74d464c6b
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 101425, which changed state.
Bug 101425 Summary: [12 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow at
candidates_list_and_hint since r12-1903-gaf9987e817f54806
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101425
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6785eb595981abd93ad85edcfdf1d2e43c0841f5
commit r12-2241-g6785eb595981abd93ad85edcfdf1d2e43c0841f5
Author: prathamesh.kulkarn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/tree-object-size.c.jj 2021-01-04 10:25:39.911221618 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-object-size.c 2021-07-12 11:28:51.328120222 +0200
@@ -1393,6 +1393,11 @@ pass_object_sizes::execute (function *fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101403
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0192c3eedbc7e6fe703abd8b321f400ddb02adf7
commit r12-2242-g0192c3eedbc7e6fe703abd8b321f400ddb02adf7
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101424
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:123d0a597beb6d9865f808bf15b0d67f2a8fd5b2
commit r12-2243-g123d0a597beb6d9865f808bf15b0d67f2a8fd5b2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92343e0ba4d47f21ae20ffcb83d736bdbc15dae0
commit r12-2244-g92343e0ba4d47f21ae20ffcb83d736bdbc15dae0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 101423, which changed state.
Bug 101423 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.c:7113 since r12-1951-ga3aaba68405751ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778
Bug 100778 depends on bug 101423, which changed state.
Bug 101423 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.c:7113 since r12-1951-ga3aaba68405751ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101423
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||siddhesh at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101427
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Summary|std::get sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101406
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Nothing can "fix" __builtin_object_size here (on sub-objects) without changing
how we represent and CSE addresses, esp. if you consider inlining where we
want to interpret __builtin_object_size (p, ..) as h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101402
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It is the cunrolli pass where things go wrong (it VNs the &u->c for both
__builtin_object_size calls while previously only the first one was &u->c and
the second was &u->i).
Now, objsz2 obviously needs to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101344
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101338
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86-64 |
Build|Homebrew GCC 11.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101343
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101268
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks. Please submit patches to the mailing lists as required by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches
Please capitalize "an" at the start of every sentence, and use markdown `...`
instead of @c .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101318
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96851
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobias.bruell at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101318
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101338
--- Comment #2 from Josip Palavra ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> All your examples are missing a semi-colon after the struct definition.
Oops, thanks for pointing that out! The problem persists even with all the
semicolons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/tree-pass.h.jj 2021-01-27 10:10:00.525903635 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-pass.h 2021-07-12 13:10:59.621933276 +0200
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ protected:
#define PROP_gimple_lcf(1 << 1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The above patch will slightly pessimize optimizations during the
NEXT_PASS (pass_remove_cgraph_callee_edges);
/* Initial scalar cleanups before alias computation.
They ensure memory acce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
I think none of
NEXT_PASS (pass_complete_unrolli);
NEXT_PASS (pass_backprop);
NEXT_PASS (pass_phiprop);
NEXT_PASS (pass_forwprop);
are useful for objsize so IMHO we should move pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Created attachment 51139 [details]
> gcc12-pr101419.patch
>
> Full untested patch.
I guess that's certainly what was intended (and after the patch more expl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 51139 [details]
> > gcc12-pr101419.patch
> >
> > Full untested patch.
>
> I guess that'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I agree about most of the passes you are moving, but I have an (albeit
artificial) testcase that proves that cunrolli does affect objsz:
__SIZE_TYPE__ a[10];
void
foo (void)
{
char *p = __builtin_malloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Note usually we still run all property providers but the way you set
> the property outside of pass->properties_provided breaks this. Thus
> maybe split objs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
--- Comment #7 from Simon Willcocks ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Moving the line is the right fix
Thanks for the confirmation.
> It is recommended to initialize normal automatic variables first and then
> only initialize re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|ian at airs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
>
> --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I agree about most of the passes you are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
>
> --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101398
--- Comment #2 from Will Cohen ---
Created attachment 51141
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51141&action=edit
The uv_irq.i file
The uv_irq.i file was created from 98f7fdced2e0efb1599a37b3e57671a7884f3a25 of
git://git.kernel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> Well, my point was to avoid pessimizing the VN done from cunrolli ;)
> Of course any duplication / threading can improve __bos precision,
> but then any tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Ofer Shinaar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ofer.shinaar at wdc dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101405
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-12
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100227
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101421
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101406
Marc Mutz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Marc Mutz ---
Ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
>
> --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fedcf3c476aff7533741a1c61071200f0a38cf83
commit r12-2254-gfedcf3c476aff7533741a1c61071200f0a38cf83
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101199
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51125|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101395
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 51142
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51142
A patch
Can't you use one single local_cpu_detect and pass it 2 arguments (arch/tune
and 32/64) instead of just one (ar
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo