https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No that has never been true. The date in the URL is a clue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101306
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
MOVED is the appropriate resolution, thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #230 from John Buddery ---
The mpfr issue seems to be an issue with gcc 4.9.2 compiling later mpfr
versions.
It builds with 4.7.2, so as a workaround try building mpfr outside the gcc tree
using 4.7.2. This may mean you need to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101321
Bug ID: 101321
Summary: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-3.c fail on arm-eabi
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
ralphengels at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ralphengels at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |testsuite
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101321
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
OK, makes sense, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101296
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Samples: 884K of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 96751841
Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
13.76%119196 milc_peak.amd64 mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101296
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51104&action=edit
mult_su3_nn testcase
This is the function with the (nearly) only and many vaddsubpd instructions.
With the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101296
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Disabling vectorization for mult_su3_nn (the one with the vaddsubpd
instructions) still reproduces
433.milc 9180126 73.1 *9180133 69.2 *
and thus a 5% slowdown.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|turns infinite loop into|[10/11/12 Regression] turns
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
% MALLOC_PERTURB_=1 MALLOC_CHECK_=3 gcc-12.0.0 -c tt.c
tt.c:5:9: error: #if with no expression
5 | #if M1()
| ^
tt.c:7:9: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
7 | #pragma pack()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101291
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38872c6c0db1b10b17d3913b277c499913208d0b
commit r12-2003-g38872c6c0db1b10b17d3913b277c499913208d0b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101323
Bug ID: 101323
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[10/11/12 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101177
--- Comment #3 from Harold Gutch ---
With my patch, the NetBSD/dreamcast build successfully reaches multiuser.
Also, note that the rest of the commit looks very much like what the commit
message described, but I don't see anything that might ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101321
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ea47850bbb38ea81a34c503533d4dd0f3391f19
commit r12-2005-g0ea47850bbb38ea81a34c503533d4dd0f3391f19
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101321
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283
--- Comment #10 from Indu Bhagat ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> > we are now left with (where I suspect that the remaining fails are an
> > artefact of the way in which Darwin represen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101324
Bug ID: 101324
Summary: powerpc64le: hashst appears before mflr at -O1 or
higher
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101325
Bug ID: 101325
Summary: [12 Regression] arm: Wrong code with MVE vcmpeqq
intrinsic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101325
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
Execution test for the testsuite:
#include
__attribute((noinline,noipa))
unsigned foo(int8x16_t v, int8x16_t w)
{
return vcmpeqq (v, w);
}
int main(void)
{
if (foo (vdupq_n_s8(0), vdupq_n_s8(0)) !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101326
Bug ID: 101326
Summary: std::optional returns forced through stack
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101327
Bug ID: 101327
Summary: ICE in find_array_element, at fortran/expr.c:1355
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101328
Bug ID: 101328
Summary: ICE in conv_array_index_offset, at
fortran/trans-array.c:3425
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101329
Bug ID: 101329
Summary: ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
Bug ID: 101330
Summary: ICE in free_expr0(): Bad expr type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101326
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
last example for x86 should have been
foo():# @foo()
xor eax, eax
mov dl, 1
ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101331
Bug ID: 101331
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in sanitize_coverage_p, at
asan.h:259
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101332
Bug ID: 101332
Summary: [12 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr91838.C
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101187
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101332
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101326
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-05
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Assuming that you divide the "default" case into ten pieces of 0.01 each,
some slight corrections:
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
> int foo3 (int n)
> {
> if (__builtin_expect_with_proba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101330
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101329
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-05
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101333
Bug ID: 101333
Summary: gfortran fails to enforce C711 on assumed-type actual
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90077
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101334
Bug ID: 101334
Summary: gfortran fails to enforce C838 on disallowed uses of
assumed-rank variable names + bogus errors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
gcc version 12.0.0 20210705 (experimental) [master revision
59748b71805:2d42892d7cd:8e0b3827bbab6bf92d88d00909ecf8fb43365f39] (GCC)
[637] %
[637] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[638] %
[638] % gcctk -Os small.c
[639] % ./a.out
Aborted
[640] % cat small.c
unsigned a = 0x;
int b;
int main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be8749f939a933bca6de19d9cf1a510d5954c2fa
commit r12-2036-gbe8749f939a933bca6de19d9cf1a510d5954c2fa
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-05
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101290
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Anything constructing a constant-size type half the address space or
larger in size should be diagnosed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101237
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c44b412fec8d5ab7fc064065414314a8ae05c87
commit r12-2038-g3c44b412fec8d5ab7fc064065414314a8ae05c87
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101039
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d6979197274a662da7bdc564314afe8415865c1
commit r12-2041-g7d6979197274a662da7bdc564314afe8415865c1
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #10)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> > > we are now left with (where I suspect that the remaining fails are an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101237
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101039
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51539
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
Created attachment 51106
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51106&action=edit
Add Doxygen documentation to items in stl_function.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101268
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Christopher Yeleighton from comment #0)
> > (I mean patches are not welcome)
>
> Have you actually tried submitting any? I only see bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101336
Bug ID: 101336
Summary: Incorrect target on gnux32 hosts
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libffi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283
--- Comment #12 from Indu Bhagat ---
The intention is to be able to generate CTF/BTF correctly irrespective of the
DWARF version.
The case of DW_TAG_restrict_type is unique though, and looks like we will need
special handling. To be specific,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54753
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101324
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Could you attach something that is a valid input to the compiler? Something
that does not include the preprocessor directives... did you use -dM?
Don't :-)
(I can reproduce with this code, but there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101324
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
So, even if I use
-fno-shrink-wrap
and, although rs6000.c has anyway
/* If we are inserting ROP-protect instructions, disable shrink wrap. */
if (rs6000_rop_protect)
flag_shrink_wrap = 0;
we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3543b5e8002c033b2304d7ac1d1e58218eebb51
commit r12-2044-ga3543b5e8002c033b2304d7ac1d1e58218eebb51
Author: Indu Bhagat
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101283
--- Comment #14 from Indu Bhagat ---
With the two patches (commit r12-2044-ga3543b5e8002c033b2304d7ac1d1e58218eebb51
+ the other in review) only two further failures remain to be looked into:
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-3.c scan-assemb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100328
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ffe25eefae57fb3a228a2d31a57af5bdab8911f
commit r12-2045-g8ffe25eefae57fb3a228a2d31a57af5bdab8911f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jul 5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100328
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c64d15224c6dc4dc3b6b3c2c6b6fd5c7e0e9c072
commit r12-2046-gc64d15224c6dc4dc3b6b3c2c6b6fd5c7e0e9c072
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pinskia at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15360
Andrei Cherniaev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dungeonlords789 at yandex dot
ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101337
Bug ID: 101337
Summary: gfortran doesn't diagnose all operands with constraint
violations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15360
--- Comment #10 from Andrei Cherniaev ---
I suggest allow use directive extern without array size.
main.c:
#define size ( 1 )
char arr[size];
int main()
{
return 0;
}
second.c:
extern char arr[];
void f(){
sizeof(arr);
}
It was erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101290
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101326
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think the issue is simply that RTL expansion forces the object to memory
since that is what GIMPLE does:
struct optional foo ()
{
struct optional D.12374;
[local count: 1073741824]:
MEM [(struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83782
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99332
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Summary|[11 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100782
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101260
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101172
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
84 matches
Mail list logo
