https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11877
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cedbaab8e048b90ceb9ceef0d851385fae67cde
commit r12-1668-g9cedbaab8e048b90ceb9ceef0d851385fae67cde
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101142
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08c85f609a73fb36fdcbd9f327a5a645c20ac816
commit r12-1669-g08c85f609a73fb36fdcbd9f327a5a645c20ac816
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101142
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Not sure backport to GCC11, this patch only modifies the cost model of RA on
the back end, no functional changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101144
Bug ID: 101144
Summary: Coroutine compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101131
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101132
--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao ---
I'm attempting to fix it by adding vec_cmp and vec_cmpu expand into
mips-msa.md. Bootstrapped on mips64el-linux-gnu and regtest is running.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #13 from YunQiang Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Sure.
> One interesting question is whether there are *.o objects with multiple
> .debug_line_str sections (but even if there are, shouldn't the linker merge
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Apparently, we already have an attribute that prevents function instrumentation
regarding PGO:
no_profile_instrument_function
The no_profile_instrument_function attribute on functions is used to inform the
#11 from Hongtao.liu ---
I'm not sure if it's related but compilation of 527.cam4_r still hangs with
gcc version 12.0.0 20210621 (experimental) (GCC)
and option:
-march=cascadelake -Ofast -funroll-loops -flto -g -mfpmath=sse
hang on this thread for more than 2h.
liuhongt 79919 7991
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101145
Bug ID: 101145
Summary: niter analysis fails for until-wrap condition
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101145
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101121
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90f78d5d86598f8cadacfb20d8d98c122a466599
commit r12-1670-g90f78d5d86598f8cadacfb20d8d98c122a466599
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101136
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh it wasn't last year, it was January this year. There's a patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2021-January/051868.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #11)
> I'm not sure if it's related but compilation of 527.cam4_r still hangs with
>
> gcc version 12.0.0 20210621 (experimental) (GCC)
Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97906
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29a539a675b8ffd8e20fd3926d6ba0482ea0f275
commit r12-1671-g29a539a675b8ffd8e20fd3926d6ba0482ea0f275
Author: prathamesh.kulkarni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66791
--- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch committed for vceq:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=316dd79876873222552bdf6aa31338012bc9b955
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
Bug ID: 101146
Summary: mesa build with LTO is crashing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101147
Bug ID: 101147
Summary: [GCOV] Wrong coverage with label inside "while" loop
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
--- Comment #13 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #12)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #11)
> > I'm not sure if it's related but compilation of 527.cam4_r still hangs with
> >
> &
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101148
Bug ID: 101148
Summary: [12 Regression] ranger compile-tme hog when building
527.cam4_r
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101148
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
I can confirm this and I've opened PR101148 for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101148
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
GCC11 is ok, so is GCC20210603. I've checked that GCC20210610, GCC202010616,
GCC20210621 all have this problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101148
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101149
Bug ID: 101149
Summary: Coroutine compiler error with ternary operator
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100785
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:644c2cc5f2c09506a7bfef293a7f90efa8d7e5fa
commit r12-1696-g644c2cc5f2c09506a7bfef293a7f90efa8d7e5fa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101150
Bug ID: 101150
Summary: null pointer dereference false positive disappears
when compiling an additional function
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80431
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de31f5445b12fd9ab9969dc536d821fe6f0edad0
commit r12-1697-gde31f5445b12fd9ab9969dc536d821fe6f0edad0
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67302
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21761d2b2b01f6cef4287c646845f6b3006546aa
commit r12-1698-g21761d2b2b01f6cef4287c646845f6b3006546aa
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80431
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67302
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58055
Bug 58055 depends on bug 67302, which changed state.
Bug 67302 Summary: [C++14] copy elision in return (expression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67302
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
I forgot about on crucial detail. To reproduce that you need env with NVidia
card.
In my case I'm using
:18:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GP104 High Definition Audio
Controller (rev a1)
Howeve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Right, it would be a good optimization. We've stopped focusing much on P8
optimization work at this point simply because of lack of resources.
The needed transform is to recognize load-xxlnor-vperm as a gr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43933
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's not fixed in GCC 9 though. I think it's probably fixed by r11-2546 for PR
94024 but I can't bisect right now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
Segher, does this fit naturally in combine?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101137
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-21
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101137
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And ideally, remove everything not relevant to the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86439
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101120
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ad9c7087ef3904da89f2db6007b6d28b116087f
commit r12-1699-g0ad9c7087ef3904da89f2db6007b6d28b116087f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101120
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101137
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I get the same behaviour if I replace all uses of std::conjunction with fold
expressions and split up your unreadable long lines into simpler atoms (which
also makes the code much simpler) e.g.
template
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101137
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> template
> concept SignedIntegralRef1
> = std::is_lvalue_reference_v && SignedIntegral1;
Oops, that should be
std::is_lvalue_reference_v && SignedIntegral
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101132
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89417
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101148
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Hm, I ended up with quite some files:
---
/home/marxin/Programming/cpu2017/benchspec/CPU/527.cam4_r/build/build_peak_gcc-m64./FILES
---
/home/marxin/Programming/cpu2017/benchspec/CPU/527.cam4_r/build/bui
-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210621 (experimental) [master revision
edf0c3ffb59:30584177106:12bdd39755a25d237b7776153cbe03e171396fc5] (GCC)
[512] %
[512] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[513] %
[513] % gcctk -O1 small.c
small.c: In function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88529
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7232f7c4c2d727431096a7ecfcf4ad4db71dcf2a
commit r12-1702-g7232f7c4c2d727431096a7ecfcf4ad4db71dcf2a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101148
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101134
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101051
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[ICE] in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101152
Bug ID: 101152
Summary: std::get_time %Y accepts years with less than 4 digits
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101134
--- Comment #2 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
As I said,
> Adding enough __builtin_unreachable() for that condition removes the
> warnings, but it should not be necessary.
I disagree with the resolution, though. While I understand that GCC cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796
--- Comment #10 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
Thank you very much.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does adding -fno-strict-aliasing help?
What is exactly command lines being used to compile the object files and the
final link?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
--- Comment #12 from Nick Desaulniers ---
Ah, perfect!
commit 1225d6b1134b ("Introduce no_profile_instrument_function attribute")
LGTM: https://godbolt.org/z/779xzndY6
Looks like it landed in GCC 7.1.
Let me change over the attribute identifi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #21 from koss.dallas at crm dot leadkahuna.com ---
Hello!
You can examine a list of the required documents here in one file:
xpawel.com/miss-edythe-mccullough/gcc-bugzilla-12.zip
-Original Message-
On Thursday, 25 March
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
The ICE does not happen with -std=c++20.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101040
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] [ICE] |[10/11/12 Regression] [ICE]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #5 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
About strict aliasing: I need to check that (will back with results shortly)
Here is short sctipt to produce binaries:
CFLAGS='-O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #6 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
Hmm .. why status has been changed to RESOLVED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
--- Comment #14 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
> What's likely missing is that the attribute should prevent inlining. I'm
> going to test how it behaves right now. Then, the issue can be closed.
It's not clear
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #7 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2977
>
> So not a GCC bug.
This not the same stack trace and that ticket is more than year old.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tomasz Kłoczko from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/2977
> >
> > So not a GCC bug.
>
> This not the same stack t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101153
Bug ID: 101153
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/float128-minmax.c
fails after r12-1605
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100971
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
--- Comment #15 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #14)
> Can a no_profile_instrument_function function be inlined into a function
> without the attribute? This may be controversial but I'd argue that it can.
> GCC n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #9 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Does adding -fno-strict-aliasing help?
> What is exactly command lines being used to compile the object files and the
> final link?
Just tested binaries builkd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #11)
> Segher, does this fit naturally in combine?
This is just constant folding, combine won't have much to do with it.
It is always better (namely, lower late
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101154
Bug ID: 101154
Summary: [12 Regression] AddressSanitizer:
dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow on address: in
vect_build_slp_tree_2 ../../gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2039
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101155
Bug ID: 101155
Summary: comparing non-capturing lambdas is not constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-21
Ever confirmed|0
gcc version 12.0.0 20210621 (experimental) [master revision
:ac955e7ab:3e42ff715697c75c4fb4aed550a8a15edb3eeea6] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
struct S {
int i;
} baz(struct S *p) {
setjmp(p--);
}
$ gcc-trunk mutant.c
mutant.c: In function ‘baz’:
mutant.c:4:3: warning: implicit declaration of function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101146
--- Comment #10 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
Just restarted gdm on system with mesa compiled with -flifetime-dse=1 abd it
works.
Looks like it wi still sometbing to do with medsa code to add probably
necessary #pragma around the code which relies on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573338.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157
Bug ID: 101157
Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling
gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101134
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
The warning architecture doesn't make it possible to distinguish between the
two situations you describe. No flow-sensitive GCC warning points out a
certain bug: every instance needs to be viewed as only a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f2819223873266b4cdfa7af54752a37d1ebd665
commit r11-8628-g4f2819223873266b4cdfa7af54752a37d1ebd665
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2348a458e156641c5d4b0e998ae0d175196cfd51
commit r11-8629-g2348a458e156641c5d4b0e998ae0d175196cfd51
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100782
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> Not sure if it's a dupe of bug #100241. Filing just in case.
Probably different: it's a different target and different instruction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100137
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100310
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6efffa552cee6a20a58c91e5f41466c5715d73d
commit r12-1705-gb6efffa552cee6a20a58c91e5f41466c5715d73d
Author: liuhongt
Date: Wed Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100267
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f51618f301664d02cc41205f1386c0c9b9a29a54
commit r12-1706-gf51618f301664d02cc41205f1386c0c9b9a29a54
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100310
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4175a5d9bb8fe0a62baeff748a18efe884c97c6
commit r11-8637-gd4175a5d9bb8fe0a62baeff748a18efe884c97c6
Author: liuhongt
Date:
, .-dummyf1_avx512x8
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 12.0.0 20210621 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100310
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
