https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
So interestingly we do compute a distance vector of zero but we fail to add it,
instead we end up returning true from build_classic_dist_vector_1 without
setting *init_b to true (the access fns are not POLY
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] wrong code |[10/11/12 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #19)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> >
> > That's going to work I guess but it will pessimize general optimization
> > which no longer know this is co
Hello
Do you currently accept guest posts on - lttng.org?
I’d be happy to provide you with a high-quality article related to the tech or
eCommerce niche.
Let me know the requirements.
Lisa Smith
Don't want emails from us anymore? Reply to this email with the word
"UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> @@ -5435,7 +5437,7 @@ build_classic_dist_vector (struct
> data_dependence_relation
> *ddr,
> save_dist_v (ddr, save_v);
> }
> }
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101021
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
Bug ID: 101026
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since
r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Shorter IL testcase:
int a[10];
int b, d, g;
volatile char c;
short e;
volatile int f;
int main()
{
for (; d <= 9; d++) {
b = e = 0;
for (; e < 4; e++)
a[e] = 4;
for (; b <= 3;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101027
Bug ID: 101027
Summary: Short-circuit behavior not respected with co_await in
while head
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
So started with r11-4123-g128f43cf679e51564202b41f23fae4146347f93d.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is with sm_seq_valid_bb which when processing store sequences from
multiple branches of the CFG performs merging in a way that drops refs
that still need to be considered for dependence queries.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> With -O2 -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-pre -ftree-loop-distribution even GCC 10
> miscompiles the code. For dg-torture:
That started with r10-141-g051ef623d6e332a6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:336c41dbcb21740f8964021e157bc69ca547059b
commit r12-1381-g336c41dbcb21740f8964021e157bc69ca547059b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[10/11/12 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bf728aecc4fea46b4490e950b9ae229f90597b0
commit r12-1383-g8bf728aecc4fea46b4490e950b9ae229f90597b0
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79185
--- Comment #17 from Raphael C ---
Tested in gcc 11.1 with -O2
ai(__int128, __int128):
mov r9, rdi
mov rax, rdx
mov r8, rsi
mov rdx, rcx
add rax, r9
adc rdx, r8
ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79201
--- Comment #5 from Raphael C ---
I can confirm you now get
f:
mov eax, 1
ret
with gcc 8 onwards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-11
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101021
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fa991d1d74cb1ce96c48ede70ae0be7a9683ce3
commit r12-1384-g1fa991d1d74cb1ce96c48ede70ae0be7a9683ce3
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
--- Comment #2 from Leonard von Merzljak ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> for symmetric transfer to work without stack overflow, it relies on an
> indirect tailcall.
>
> For some GCC targets indirect tail-calls are not available
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101021
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Bug ID: 101028
Summary: [12 Regression] SLP compile-time hog since
r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a984da88a35b42f444d1f9eeba77aa520b950d35
commit r12-1385-ga984da88a35b42f444d1f9eeba77aa520b950d35
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4bdcdd8fa8d7659e5a19a930cf2f0332127f8a46
commit r12-1386-g4bdcdd8fa8d7659e5a19a930cf2f0332127f8a46
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Leonard von Merzljak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> Thank you for your comment. I tried it out and can confirm that I don't get
> a stack-overflow anymore if I omi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbd8a8041292f2ec2c22be43c8d3e74b37b2bc88
commit r12-1387-gfbd8a8041292f2ec2c22be43c8d3e74b37b2bc88
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101024
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have a start but there are a few patterns that need to be moved.
An example is from gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr66726-4.c:
#define SAT(x) (x < 0 ? 0 : (x > 255 ? 255 : x))
void
foo (unsigned char *p, int i)
{
*p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Bug ID: 101029
Summary: unexpected error: non-constant condition for static
assertion in gcc 10/11, but not 9 (clang also fine)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #1 from Jim Walker ---
Adding version output:
/opt/gcc-10.2.0/bin/g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 10.2.0
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jim Walker from comment #0)
> /opt/gcc-10.2.0/include/c++/10.2.0/type_traits:918:52: error: non-constant
> condition for static assertion
> 918 |
> static_assert(std::__is_complete_or_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101030
Bug ID: 101030
Summary: gcc internal error with Wconversion
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9ec5ebb605936684e95b8dcc12e43ba7d8f2cb4
commit r12-1388-gb9ec5ebb605936684e95b8dcc12e43ba7d8f2cb4
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 101028, which changed state.
Bug 101028 Summary: [12 Regression] SLP compile-time hog since
r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101028
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100949
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
// { dg-do run { target lp64 } }
(or ! ia32 if you want).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Here it is:
>
Thank you, I probably wouldn't be able to get back to this until next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101020
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-11
CC|
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
It appears to be a recent regression.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210611 (experimental) [master revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Qirun Zhang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|wrong code at -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 50985
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50985&action=edit
test-case
I see the following issue when not using an optimization level:
$ g++ gcc_issue.cc -c
gcc_issue.cc:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Simpler IL:
int a;
char b, e;
static char *c = &b;
static long d;
void f(void);
void __attribute__((noipa)) h() {
int g = 0;
for (; g < 2; ++g) {
d = *c;
*c = 1;
b = 0;
}
f();
}
void __
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:117c64266405e244da4dae3ae7b60905af63b955
commit r12-1390-g117c64266405e244da4dae3ae7b60905af63b955
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 100974, which changed state.
Bug 100974 Summary: [C++23] Implement if consteval
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Hi Carl -- while you're in there, can you please remove these?
+BU_P10_OVERLOAD_2 (VRLQ, "vrlq")
+BU_P10_OVERLOAD_2 (VSLQ, "vslq")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101023
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99939
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5ed0148347beea1bd34795de146a2454c36
commit r12-1391-gc5ed0148347beea1bd34795de146a2454c36
Author: Srinath Parvathane
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100948
--- Comment #4 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
I am looking into this.
I think I already have a patch for the ICE, but there are further problems
which I am trying to solve.
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101015
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This is because dump_decl does the decoration for TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P:
1228 if (TYPE_DECL_ALIAS_P (t)
1229 && (flags & TFF_DECL_SPECIFIERS
1230 || flags & TFF_CLASS_KEY_OR_ENUM))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101032
Bug ID: 101032
Summary: Regression on parser with g++11 using experimental
c++20 (compiles under c++17)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101033
Bug ID: 101033
Summary: Error message for spelling error in copy assignment
operator could be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8b80b8aa3d9a7abbcb59b651ea5e84c2ea12d0b
commit r12-1392-gb8b80b8aa3d9a7abbcb59b651ea5e84c2ea12d0b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[11/12 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96392
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b02ed4b87685c0f7c5da9b46cde3ce56fcfd457
commit r12-1393-g5b02ed4b87685c0f7c5da9b46cde3ce56fcfd457
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
Bug ID: 101034
Summary: wrong constraint in std::any's constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
I see this also with the source code for ./gcc.target/i386/pr100936.c
and flag -g:
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20210611.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -g
./gcc.target/i386/pr100936.c
./gcc.target/i386/pr100936.c:5:1: internal compiler error: in add_dwarf_attr,
at
dwarf2out.c:4493
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
--- Comment #8 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Fixed on trunk sofar. Keep more testcases coming ;) (I have a hunch this
> code has more issues...)
Thanks, Richard. Will do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
any#L272 has the same typo:
template
__emplace_t, initializer_list<_Up>, _Args&&...>
emplace(initializer_list<_Up> __il, _Args&&... __args)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96392
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a761829ae06a754f72ff957cbedb21f4d98fab70
commit r12-1394-ga761829ae06a754f72ff957cbedb21f4d98fab70
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Fri Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101032
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kevin.c.eady at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If the invalid special member is defined out of the class body, you get another
error:
template
struct F
{
F();
};
template
inline F::F() { }
101032.C:4:8: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘)’ to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101033
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101033
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101016
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b13f297f01c943aa167f7c6eb94bed40dce0d553
commit r12-1395-gb13f297f01c943aa167f7c6eb94bed40dce0d553
Author: Srinath Parvathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101035
Bug ID: 101035
Summary: ICE: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1751
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68f46862d33707450bdf70cfddd91ae2a12527a8
commit r12-1396-g68f46862d33707450bdf70cfddd91ae2a12527a8
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101036
Bug ID: 101036
Summary: ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a30552af7073aba16af6798a1e6cd0a345b06586
commit r11-8553-ga30552af7073aba16af6798a1e6cd0a345b06586
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101037
Bug ID: 101037
Summary: std::atomic_flag deadlock on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100950
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The variant with typespec and non-constant length is incorrectly rejected:
program p
integer :: n = 2
print *, [character(n) :: 'a', 'b']
end
All versions since at least gcc-7 give:
pr1009
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101037
--- Comment #1 from Björn Sundin ---
The preprocessed file was too big. Should I attach the original C++ source or a
compressed version of the preprocessed file instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101037
--- Comment #2 from Björn Sundin ---
Created attachment 50987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50987&action=edit
A short ping-pong example program.
The preprocessed file was too large so I attached the original C++ source
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92469
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
This isn't completely fixed:
[hjl@gnu-clx-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./
/export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97032.c -m32
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -O2 -mincoming-stack-boundary=2
-fstack-pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96560
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0d73a66ae3962fa83309527d85613d72a6aa43d
commit r12-1398-gb0d73a66ae3962fa83309527d85613d72a6aa43d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
