https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100986
Bug ID: 100986
Summary: internal compiler error: in finish_expr_stmt, at
cp/semantics.c:681
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
>
> --- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski ---
> * minmax_replacement: has some handling o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50969
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50969&action=edit
patch fixing the ICE
So this fixes the ICE but I'm not sure whether correct code is generated yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100936
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:267dbd42f42c52a515f49c0875d296a9cf5988fe
commit r12-1318-g267dbd42f42c52a515f49c0875d296a9cf5988fe
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100936
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Runtime testcase (not sure if sufficient ...). Andre - can you verify it
passes runtime testing with the patch on HW that supports the complex mul?
complex function cdcdot(n, cx)
implicit none
intege
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100987
Bug ID: 100987
Summary: make distclean error "hwasan: No such file or
directory"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100987
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||62157
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100985
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems like automake bug to me, all this DIST_SUBDIRS vs. SUBDIRS and
am__recursive_targets stuff comes from it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, of course, distclean doesn't make much sense when building in a
separate build directory, just removing the whole build directory is the right
distclean.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100985
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-09
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90742
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100965
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4d38135b3137f1d3148138340e67bdcd7ea8216
commit r12-1319-gd4d38135b3137f1d3148138340e67bdcd7ea8216
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100965
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk, will need to check release branches if they are affected
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100988
Bug ID: 100988
Summary: Missed optimization: RESTRICT missing for optional
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100989
Bug ID: 100989
Summary: Bogus internal VOLATILE attribute for ASYNCHRONOUS
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100990
Bug ID: 100990
Summary: Iterator checks for Debug Mode cannot be used with a
non-common range
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhanc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91910
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|SUSPENDED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #228 from John Buddery ---
Sorry it took a while, I've been away for a bit and have lots to catch up on.
These patches are for 11.1.0, but should work on earlier versions too. With
this I have a working gcc which I've tested on sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
--- Comment #22 from David Friberg ---
(In reply to TC from comment #21)
> (In reply to David Friberg from comment #19)
> >
> > P0398R0 [1] describes the final resolution to CWG 1518, after which the
> > following example is arguably well-formed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #227 from John Buddery ---
Created attachment 50970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50970&action=edit
Patches for gcc-11.1.0, hp-ia64
Mostly patches from this thread, apart from ia64.md which adds support for
usi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100920
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5be418dc591014b1773d59abca8fba5be34df618
commit r11-8533-g5be418dc591014b1773d59abca8fba5be34df618
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3fce1bd45f72cc9e55fb7431762e92e30fefcf1
commit r12-1327-gb3fce1bd45f72cc9e55fb7431762e92e30fefcf1
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100991
Bug ID: 100991
Summary: [OpenMP] firstprivate for optional arguments is
mishandled
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100986
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100896
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13a39886940331149173b25d6ebde0850668d8b9
commit r12-1328-g13a39886940331149173b25d6ebde0850668d8b9
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Jun 8 16:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100896
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah that works. Ran it as is, no abort, ran it with s/ne/eq/ and it aborts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797
commit r12-1329-gce670e4faafb296d1f1a7828d20f8c8ba4686797
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 97832, which changed state.
Bug 97832 Summary: AoSoA complex caxpy-like loops: AVX2+FMA -Ofast 7 times
slower than -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99412
Bug 99412 depends on bug 97832, which changed state.
Bug 97832 Summary: AoSoA complex caxpy-like loops: AVX2+FMA -Ofast 7 times
slower than -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97832
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100992
Bug ID: 100992
Summary: Wrong result for is_constructible for const ref of
tuple of tuples
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a9d8fd580d6afab669bae68e116e2135c2a8670
commit r11-8534-g0a9d8fd580d6afab669bae68e116e2135c2a8670
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100065
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #6 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FYI Tamar asked me to make sure the instructions were being generated. I
checked and they were, but not being used as it decides to inline MAIN__ and
inlining seems to break (as in not apply/miss
model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210609 (experimental) [master revision
:c23bc3c72:87f9ac937d6cfd81cbbe0a43518ba10781888d7c] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
__builtin_acc_on_device(dev) { return __builtin_acc_on_device(dev); }
$ gcc-trunk -O2 mutant.c
mutant.c:1:1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96560
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Bug ID: 100994
Summary: wrong code with "-O1 -finline-small-functions
-fipa-cp"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:374f93da97fb0378453d503f3cfea4d7a923a89c
commit r12-1330-g374f93da97fb0378453d503f3cfea4d7a923a89c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in info_for_reduction, |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100992
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Bug ID: 100995
Summary: Extend std::is_constant_evaluated in if warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100992
--- Comment #2 from Amir Kirsh ---
Maybe a dup of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96592
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c17b5f8cca82d1957242055991a2c23184a1af1
commit r12-1332-g2c17b5f8cca82d1957242055991a2c23184a1af1
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed Jun 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100996
Bug ID: 100996
Summary: rs6000 p10 vector add-add fusion should work with -m32
but doesn't
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100996
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.leroy at csgroup
dot eu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100995
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100989
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100989
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a0c4eaea320a418400afc4d63359ed6c4af5548
commit r12-1342-g4a0c4eaea320a418400afc4d63359ed6c4af5548
Author: Paul Eggert
Date: Wed Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100972
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Similarly, the helpful option -Wimplicit-procedure does not warn :
(-Wimplicit-procedure : Warn if a procedure is called that has neither
an explicit interface nor has been declared as EXTERNAL.)
$ gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595
--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to H. Peter Anvin from comment #9)
> How is this different from raise(SIGTRAP);?
It does an architecture-specific trap instruction, not a SIGTRAP signal.
The former is useful even if you do n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
Nickolay Merkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickolay.merkin at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
Bug ID: 100997
Summary: [c++20] parse error when id-expression of constructor
is simple-template-id
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.morgner at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
To make it work just remove the "" in A() {}.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100997
--- Comment #3 from Felix Morgner ---
Thank you for the quick response. I will file a bug report with Boost GIL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As comment 7 already said.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100695
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Bug ID: 100998
Summary: bug in experimental GCC12 with optimization '-O1',
disappears with optimization '-O0'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04fea2d66bd680beb1a204e62f2f459307000813
commit r12-1344-g04fea2d66bd680beb1a204e62f2f459307000813
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:036e14ca44eaddf329a79d56d556862118b1f220
commit r12-1345-g036e14ca44eaddf329a79d56d556862118b1f220
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6c3ed60276b842114aefce54d73e30e578fdd6d
commit r11-8535-gc6c3ed60276b842114aefce54d73e30e578fdd6d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10d4f283f4177d80cec3c9e8bf447a48cab5bb47
commit r11-8536-g10d4f283f4177d80cec3c9e8bf447a48cab5bb47
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7ece1a32000a9943f5bd5ac597d6ce3829aff8e
commit r10-9898-gf7ece1a32000a9943f5bd5ac597d6ce3829aff8e
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d660f34b6718c5f107fd1f1a2126aec759a6593b
commit r10-9899-gd660f34b6718c5f107fd1f1a2126aec759a6593b
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe555102dc224b4d946becc8a9db514ecec66161
commit r9-9575-gfe555102dc224b4d946becc8a9db514ecec66161
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0ff449baf8d64819badb1883221b5b7295e7406
commit r9-9576-gd0ff449baf8d64819badb1883221b5b7295e7406
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100935
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100964
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
Bug ID: 100999
Summary: d: foreach over a tuple doesn't work on 16-bit targets
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|wrong code with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The difference after IPA between r12-433 and r12-434 is:
--- pr100994.c.092t.fixup_cfg3_ 2021-06-09 14:26:08.0 -0400
+++ pr100994.c.092t.fixup_cfg3 2021-06-09 14:26:28.0 -0400
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
Tim Ruffing changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public at timruffing dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f0d7f322172d411d271aa02024a342c72534465
commit r12-1346-g8f0d7f322172d411d271aa02024a342c72534465
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jun 9 11:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100994
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, SRA isn't really needed, consider following testcase with
-O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-fre
struct S { unsigned b : 4; unsigned c : 9; } const d;
__attribute__((noipa)) void foo (v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100998
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
FYI, I'll give Gordon a build without that patch to test with and see if his
issue goes away with that.
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
