https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892
--- Comment #34 from Joakim Tjernlund ---
(In reply to Christophe Leroy from comment #28)
> Looks like we have a way to do it. Works at least with GCC 5.5, 8.2, 9.2,
> 10.1
>
> unsigned long g(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> {
> unsign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100703
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Grund ---
I found that this was fixed in 10.3 and 11.1 by
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/e2882e76089cecdc268d0835c54cabfa80b5b0be
So yes only happens in 10.2. Thanks for checking that!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100890
Bug ID: 100890
Summary: The "div" standard library functions could be
optimised as builtins
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100885
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> Need to adjust the third constraint from (v, vm, C, n) to (Yw, Ywm, C, n)
Also for those extend instructions which need AVX512VL is needed for
xmm16-xmm32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at westcontrol dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70742
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|andres.tiraboschi@tallertec |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855
--- Comment #7 from Nadav Halahmi ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> On a MacOS, Corei9, 2.4Ghz, the program runs in ~1s, almost indpendtly of
> the option level.
>
> This PR remind me an old problem in which the transcend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59202
federico changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||federico.perini at gmail dot
com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59202
--- Comment #4 from federico ---
The self-assignment issue is present even if the derived type has no
allocatable components. Here is a sample test program that gives an error with
gfortran 10.2.0:
module assign
implicit none
pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:098f4e989beb1a1be1157430c56ea4f158c1d538
commit r12-1171-g098f4e989beb1a1be1157430c56ea4f158c1d538
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e58539d965059994ebac606ae7533e857bbe199f
commit r11-8506-ge58539d965059994ebac606ae7533e857bbe199f
Author: Alex Coplan
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100888
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100891
Bug ID: 100891
Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100877
Feng Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67193
Tobias Schlüter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0, 11.1.0
--- Comment #4 from Tob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-03
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly adjusted so that it doesn't use uninitialized vars and does actually
return what is computed:
typedef unsigned __int128 U __attribute__((__vector_size__ (64)));
typedef unsigned __int128 V __attribu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100889
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100885
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571815.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Probably related issue:
$ cat testcase.c
typedef unsigned long long __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) U;
typedef unsigned long long __attribute__((__vector_size__ (32))) V;
typedef unsigned long long __a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> ICEs since r12-1128-gef8176e0fac935c095cc39f4ecdfd43cdb8cb3f3
That is when __builtin_shufflevector() was introduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad085ef5fb4142df2027f81ea03992fdafc6e2f6
commit r12-1176-gad085ef5fb4142df2027f81ea03992fdafc6e2f6
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Created attachment 50919 [details]
> gcc12-pr100887.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Thank you for the patch. So the testcase from c#3 might be unrelated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122
--- Comment #37 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b1190d527d01dc74ee53e47b0366d01270c330c
commit r11-8508-g8b1190d527d01dc74ee53e47b0366d01270c330c
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100892
Bug ID: 100892
Summary: ICE on procedure pointer to function returning array
of size n
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98892
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100877
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100891
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tobi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100703
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100887
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50921
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50921&action=edit
gcc12-pr100887-2.patch
Untested fix for the #c3 ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100893
Bug ID: 100893
Summary: Template argument conversion fails for dependant
constant function pointer template parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27109
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100862
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69f517ac20566a645ff41a9bfca535822205a538
commit r12-1182-g69f517ac20566a645ff41a9bfca535822205a538
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100592
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d999d9b7e53b9a9cd2004a19e84c637e5e5013f5
commit r12-1183-gd999d9b7e53b9a9cd2004a19e84c637e5e5013f5
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100577
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57ed620ebfa4275d04efeec973e88f506b0e3ba8
commit r12-1184-g57ed620ebfa4275d04efeec973e88f506b0e3ba8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100892
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> So gnu is indeed faster for real(8), but the result was changed.
What OS are you using? In any sensible library REAL(4° should be faster than
REAL(8).
> notice the result was also changed
REAL(4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b4b18b892278380cdb303c097466009914b828e
commit r10-9884-g5b4b18b892278380cdb303c097466009914b828e
Author: Philippe Blai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a937d0269c1202326a74965329159d90f176438a
commit r10-9885-ga937d0269c1202326a74965329159d90f176438a
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100768
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e01562b302eae3d415b43a4efe7ce52cff3e0063
commit r10-9886-ge01562b302eae3d415b43a4efe7ce52cff3e0063
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100833
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:753c8680a46d371e179ff1ade36002486361095e
commit r10-9887-g753c8680a46d371e179ff1ade36002486361095e
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100833
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100768
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 50922
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50922&action=edit
assembler file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
--- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Executing on host: /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c
-fdiag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #9)
>
> seurer@gcc1-power7:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-test$ grep .rodata attr-retain-1.s
> .string "used_rodata2"
> .string "unused_rodata"
> .string "used_rodata"
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100893
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100870
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86694
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ehlert at thch dot uni-bonn.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86694
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894
Bug ID: 100894
Summary: The std::common_reference implementation seems to be
wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100770
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Fixed on trunk so far by r12-1195:
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:30:29 -0400
libstdc++: Avoid hard error in ranges::unique_copy [PR100770]
Here, in the constexpr if condition w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100277
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bowie.owens at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100895
Bug ID: 100895
Summary: gcc accepts invalid template argument in partial
template specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100448
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.grund@tu-dresden.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
cvised reproducer from PR 100448
template using __bool_constant struct intmax_t;
template struct ratio {
template struct duration {
static intmax_t _S_gcd();
template
using __is_harmoni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Erik Schnetter from comment #6)
> I looked for the string "GCC" in the user header files, but could not find
> any place where things would differ between GCC 10.2 and 10.3. I assume
> there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is an old, latent g++ bug, but it now makes it impossible to use cuda with
GCC (e.g. on Fedora) because of my libstdc++ changes. I will see if I can make
another libstdc++ change to avoid the ICE wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #226 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
John, would you please post your full patch set for ia64-hpux? This will help
others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5883e567564c5b3caecba0c13e8a360a14cdc846
commit r12-1197-g5883e567564c5b3caecba0c13e8a360a14cdc846
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892
--- Comment #35 from Segher Boessenkool ---
You get something like
.L5:
lwzu 9,4(10)
addc 8,3,9
adde 3,9,3
bdnz .L5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100896
Bug ID: 100896
Summary: --enable-initfini-array should be enabled for cross
compiler to Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100897
Bug ID: 100897
Summary: Symmetric transfer does not prevent stack-overflow for
C++20 coroutines
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841
--- Comment #4 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Builds now. Thanks a lot!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28123
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|2006-06-21 15:02:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
Target|i586-pc-msdosd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80636
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56223
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
There are ways of handling this case. I think the second one is better than
the first. The first is mentioned here.
The second would take:
if (a) {
foo();
b = d + e;
} else {
goo();
b = d -e;
}
an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56223
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note factor_out_conditional_conversion is a special case comment #3 really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100599
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mu11 at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #18 f
20210603 (experimental) [master revision
:fe23f36c0:9663c744e2d0942f14eafa725a1bd9f766f02a16] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
a;
fn1() {
for (; a;)
return bar(__builtin_va_arg_pack());
}
main() { fn1(); }
$ gcc-trunk -O2 mutant.c
mutant.c:1:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
1 | a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
--- Comment #19 from Patrick Palka ---
Candidate patch that addresses the ICE in the original testcase and reductions:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571899.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100899
Bug ID: 100899
Summary: internal compiler error: in retrieve_specialization,
at cp/pt.c:1240
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100899
Hans Erickson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hans.p.erickson at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56223
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 50925
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50925&action=edit
Patch which starts to fix this
This is step 1 in fixing this bug, there are two or three more steps/patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13563
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||56223
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100900
Bug ID: 100900
Summary: error: missing 'typename' prior to dependent type name
in elements_view
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
90 matches
Mail list logo
