[Bug target/100866] New: PPC: Inefficient code for vec_revb(vector unsigned short) < P9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866 Bug ID: 100866 Summary: PPC: Inefficient code for vec_revb(vector unsigned short) < P9 Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100867] New: z13: Inefficient code for vec_revb(vector unsigned short)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100867 Bug ID: 100867 Summary: z13: Inefficient code for vec_revb(vector unsigned short) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/100868] New: PPC: Inefficient code for vec_reve(vector double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100868 Bug ID: 100868 Summary: PPC: Inefficient code for vec_reve(vector double) Product: gcc Version: 8.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/100869] New: z13: Inefficient code for vec_reve(vector double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100869 Bug ID: 100869 Summary: z13: Inefficient code for vec_reve(vector double) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/100859] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in tsubst_omp_clauses, at cp/pt.c:17520 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug debug/100852] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -Og -fif-conversion -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100852 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biene

[Bug fortran/100870] New: Constant expression for bind(C) name in interface body not importable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100870 Bug ID: 100870 Summary: Constant expression for bind(C) name in interface body not importable Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Might be interesting to see whether ifort does any expression simplification here. Can you share the produced assembly?

[Bug target/100871] New: z14: vec_doublee maps to wrong builtin in vecintrin.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100871 Bug ID: 100871 Summary: z14: vec_doublee maps to wrong builtin in vecintrin.h Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug tree-optimization/100857] Simple common code sinking is not performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100857 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/100858] Simple common code hoisting is not performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100858 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/100859] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in tsubst_omp_clauses, at cp/pt.c:17520 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/100864] (a&!b) | b is not opimized to a | b for comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100864 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- You can possibly merge it with the (for bitop (bit_and bit_ior) rbitop (bit_ior bit_and) /* (x | y) & x -> x */ /* (x & y) | x -> x */ (simplify (bitop:c (rbitop:c @0 @1) @0) @0) /* (~x | y)

[Bug middle-end/100872] New: [OpenMP] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have mult_expr in simd_clone_clauses_extract, at omp-simd-clone.c:253

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100872 Bug ID: 100872 Summary: [OpenMP] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have mult_expr in simd_clone_clauses_extract, at omp-simd-clone.c:253 Product: g

[Bug target/100085] Bad code for union transfer from __float128 to vector types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085 --- Comment #9 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch sent, it could fix the __float128 to vector __int128 issue, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571689.html But for __float128 to __int128 mentioned in #c4, need hack rs6

[Bug c++/100859] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in tsubst_omp_clauses, at cp/pt.c:17520 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/100873] New: [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/subs_compare_2.c fails since r12-1152-g9f55df63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100873 Bug ID: 100873 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/subs_compare_2.c fails since r12-1152-g9f55df63 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/100874] New: [12 Regression] slight missed optimization with min-CST on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100874 Bug ID: 100874 Summary: [12 Regression] slight missed optimization with min-CST on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-opti

[Bug c++/100862] using enum member access fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100862 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100874] [12 Regression] slight missed optimization with min-CST on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100874 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/100873] [12 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/subs_compare_2.c fails since r12-1152-g9f55df63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100873 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/100874] [12 Regression] slight missed optimization with min-CST on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100874 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-02 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 --- Comment #4 from Nadav Halahmi --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Might be interesting to see whether ifort does any expression simplification > here. Can you share the produced assembly? gfortran pow.f90 -O3 -fno-tree-vecto

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 --- Comment #5 from Nadav Halahmi --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Might be interesting to see whether ifort does any expression simplification > here. Can you share the produced assembly? ifort pow.f90 -O3 -no-vec -S -o inte

[Bug target/100874] [12 Regression] slight missed optimization with min-CST on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100874 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note here is a 4th variant of the function: int f1a(int a) { int x = a - 4; return (a < 4) ? x : 0; }

[Bug middle-end/99928] [OpenMP] reduction variable in combined target construct wrongly mapped as firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ca24bd34b6ac44c17f949d89ff60d0fd4665133 commit r12-1158-g9ca24bd34b6ac44c17f949d89ff60d0fd4665133 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: W

[Bug c++/100859] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in tsubst_omp_clauses, at cp/pt.c:17520 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- WIP testcase: struct S { S () {} }; struct W { S c[10]; W () { #pragma omp task affinity (iterator (i = 0 : 10 : 1): c[i]) ; #pragma omp task depend (iterator (i = 0 : 10 : 1), inout: c[i]) ;

[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Vlad from comment #3) > My bad. It's actually a UB. The lambda lifetime is just over by the moment > of resumption of the co-routine. (oddly enough) we were discussing thia in a BSI meeting yeste

[Bug c++/100859] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in tsubst_omp_clauses, at cp/pt.c:17520 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- That last ICE seems to be specific to cdtors only, so iterator handling during cdtor cloning...

[Bug fortran/100875] New: Spurious behavior for non-advancing user defined derived type IO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100875 Bug ID: 100875 Summary: Spurious behavior for non-advancing user defined derived type IO Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 --- Comment #5 from Vlad --- > Can this be closed then? Sure. Thanks you very much! For the history, before it's closed I'd like to leave this reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60592174/lambda-lifetime-explanation-for-c20-corouti

[Bug c++/100850] [coroutine] Wrong addresses of variables captured by reference into lambda co-routines.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100850 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Ankerl from comment #1) > I just "discovered" this bug as well. The warning works correctly in g++ > 6.4, but starting from 7.1 upwards it does not work any more. No, I don't think that

[Bug c++/97712] Attribute nodiscard in virtual methods is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97712 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pacoarjonilla at yahoo dot es --- Comm

[Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-04-21 00:00:00 |2021-6-2 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan

[Bug other/44032] internals documentation is not legally safe to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44032 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't think the policy change affects this at all. There is no change to the licenses of any GCC code or docs.

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Do we ever want the _Hashtable_ebo_helper to *not* value-init its T subobject? I think we should do the value-init in _Hashtable_ebo_helper instead.

[Bug translation/90120] inconsistent punctuation in translation messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90120 Claudiu Zissulescu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 90120, which changed state. Bug 90120 Summary: inconsistent punctuation in translation messages https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90120 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/100872] [OpenMP] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have mult_expr in simd_clone_clauses_extract, at omp-simd-clone.c:253

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100872 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- The problem is that aligned(a : X * 2) In pt.c's apply_late_template_attributes, we have: > value > value > chain > value op-1: The comment in apply_late_template_

[Bug ipa/99122] [10 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/99122] [10 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122 --- Comment #32 from Richard Biener --- + /* We cannot inline a function with a VLA typed argument or result since + we have no implementation materializing a variable of such type in + the caller. */ + if (COMPLETE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (

[Bug c++/100859] [12 Regression][OpenMP] ICE in tsubst_omp_clauses, at cp/pt.c:17520 since r12-1108-g9a5de4d5af1c10a8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100859 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50908 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50908&action=edit gcc12-pr100859.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug ipa/99122] [10 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122 --- Comment #33 from Eric Botcazou --- > so that would mean adding > >&& !DECL_BY_REFERENCE (DECL_RESULT (fndecl)) > > I suppose or looking at DECL_RESULT in the first place (which is a pointer > in that case). Not in the array case th

[Bug libstdc++/96088] Range insertion into unordered_map is less effective than a loop with insertion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81eab204a56dcd8acb1ca5d7df277437ca07b51a commit r12-1162-g81eab204a56dcd8acb1ca5d7df277437ca07b51a Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8f0193b5b83f6e85d65015e79c803295baf5166 commit r12-1163-gf8f0193b5b83f6e85d65015e79c803295baf5166 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/65816] Constructor delegation does not perform zero-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8f0193b5b83f6e85d65015e79c803295baf5166 commit r12-1163-gf8f0193b5b83f6e85d65015e79c803295baf5166 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug ipa/99122] [10 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122 --- Comment #34 from Richard Biener --- interestingly I see a.9_70 = .builtin_alloca_with_align (iftmp.8_1, 8); (*a.9_70) = inline22.get_zero (); [static-chain: &FRAME.20] [return slot optimization] so there's no WITH_SIZE_EXPR, but the ret

[Bug c++/100862] using enum member access fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100862 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Ass

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100863] 23_containers/unordered_{map,set}/allocator/default_init.cc still fail at runtime even after r12-1153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Version|11.0

[Bug ipa/99122] [10 Regression] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99122 --- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou --- > interestingly I see > > a.9_70 = .builtin_alloca_with_align (iftmp.8_1, 8); > (*a.9_70) = inline22.get_zero (); [static-chain: &FRAME.20] [return slot > optimization] > > so there's no WITH_SIZE_EXPR

[Bug fortran/100860] class(*) type is (character(*)) produces a segmentation fault when run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100860 --- Comment #3 from Tom Robinson --- I tried with the main (12.0.0) and this code ran. I will try it in with our main codebase to confirm it works there too.

[Bug fortran/100860] class(*) type is (character(*)) produces a segmentation fault when run

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100860 Tom Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/99453] libstdc++*-gdb.py installation depends on library naming

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99453 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad4c21f0f59b52357019148ec94d767aa2acd8f2 commit r11-8500-gad4c21f0f59b52357019148ec94d767aa2acd8f2 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/100768] Range iterator operations should be function objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100768 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2b76257e9a487fd2c7265094f7b4d1bd46f5f03 commit r11-8501-gf2b76257e9a487fd2c7265094f7b4d1bd46f5f03 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/100833] ranges::advance should return n when i == bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100833 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88ed4abb351117f3b7ef9174b3f538c73e6012c7 commit r11-8502-g88ed4abb351117f3b7ef9174b3f538c73e6012c7 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/100676] Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10c58754a862470484eca81623b71e6851470bb6 commit r11-8503-g10c58754a862470484eca81623b71e6851470bb6 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/100676] Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/100876] New: -Wmismatched-new-delete should either look through or ignore placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876 Bug ID: 100876 Summary: -Wmismatched-new-delete should either look through or ignore placement new Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug middle-end/100872] [12 Regression] [OpenMP] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have mult_expr in simd_clone_clauses_extract, at omp-simd-clone.c:253

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/100872] [12 Regression] [OpenMP] internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have mult_expr in simd_clone_clauses_extract, at omp-simd-clone.c:253

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug testsuite/100750] new test case gcc.target/powerpc/rop-5.c fails on BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100750 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100866] PPC: Inefficient code for vec_revb(vector unsigned short) < P9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-*-* |powerpc* Severity|normal

[Bug c++/100877] New: g++ freezes system by consuming infinite amount of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100877 Bug ID: 100877 Summary: g++ freezes system by consuming infinite amount of memory Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/100876] -Wmismatched-new-delete should either look through or ignore placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100868] PPC: Inefficient code for vec_reve(vector double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100868 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jens Seifert from comment #0) > - Avoid additional "int" unsigned long long int => unsigned long long Why? Those are exactly the same types! > - add missing line breaks between builtins

[Bug target/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #3 from Jens Seifert --- - Avoid additional "int" unsigned long long int => unsigned long long Why? Those are exactly the same types! Yes, but the rest of the documentation uses unsigned long long. This is just for consistency wit

[Bug c++/100592] Bogus "qualifiers cannot be applied" error with reference type produced by dependent alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100592 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug sanitizer/100878] New: enabling UBSAN leads to false positive `'this' pointer is null` when casting lambda to function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100878 Bug ID: 100878 Summary: enabling UBSAN leads to false positive `'this' pointer is null` when casting lambda to function pointer Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/100825] function signature constraints are not a part of mangled name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100825 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #7 from TC --

[Bug fortran/100855] pow run time gfortran vs ifort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100855 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On a MacOS, Corei9, 2.4Ghz, the program runs in ~1s, almost indpendtly of the option level. This PR remind me an old problem in which the transcendental functions were almost slower for REAL(4) then

[Bug c++/100879] New: gcc is complaining of a signed compare when comparing enums of different types (same underlying type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100879 Bug ID: 100879 Summary: gcc is complaining of a signed compare when comparing enums of different types (same underlying type) Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug middle-end/100876] -Wmismatched-new-delete should understand placement new when it's not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||100406 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/100876] -Wmismatched-new-delete should understand placement new when it's not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/100838] [11/12 Regression] -fno-elide-constructors for C++14 missing required destructor call since r11-5872-g4eb28483004f8291

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100838 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:63d182b29306e582bfb151cf762820211ea1cc7e commit r12-1165-g63d182b29306e582bfb151cf762820211ea1cc7e Author: Jason Merrill Date: M

[Bug middle-end/100880] New: The build should error out for define_insn without insn template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100880 Bug ID: 100880 Summary: The build should error out for define_insn without insn template Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100881] New: [c++ modules][possible bug?] default arguments break when the default argument's type isn't explicitly included/exported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100881 Bug ID: 100881 Summary: [c++ modules][possible bug?] default arguments break when the default argument's type isn't explicitly included/exported Product: gcc Ver

[Bug d/100882] New: ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100882 Bug ID: 100882 Summary: ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755 Product: gcc Version: 9.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/96674] Failure to optimize combination of comparisons to dec+compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 96674, which changed state. Bug 96674 Summary: Failure to optimize combination of comparisons to dec+compare https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/100883] New: ifcombine should use (gimple) match and simplify instead of fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100883 Bug ID: 100883 Summary: ifcombine should use (gimple) match and simplify instead of fold Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimi

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I got it to fail on the gcc110 gcc farm machine. g:659cc7d6320aae7ab390b5886f0efed22f78e244, r12-1164 make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}' compile.exp=gcc.c-torture/compil

[Bug testsuite/100407] New test cases attr-retain-*.c fail after their introduction in r11-7284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to seurer from comment #2) > I got it to fail on the gcc110 gcc farm machine. > > g:659cc7d6320aae7ab390b5886f0efed22f78e244, r12-1164 > make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}' > co

[Bug sanitizer/71458] ICE with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug target/100841] xtensa-linux: dwarf2cfi.c:291:12: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: 'const unsigned int' and 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100841 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50b1de860a58bf85b40a72219bc2fdfaf0dff355 commit r12-1167-g50b1de860a58bf85b40a72219bc2fdfaf0dff355 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug c++/100884] New: Comparing unsigned 32 bit integer values generates 64 bit compare instructions when optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100884 Bug ID: 100884 Summary: Comparing unsigned 32 bit integer values generates 64 bit compare instructions when optimized Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/100885] New: [12 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2671: insn does not satisfy its constraints: {sse4_1_zero_extendv8qiv8hi2}

usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-1164-20210602094549-g659cc7d6320-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210602 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/100886] New: Variable character pointer within a Fortran derived type can't determine the shape(mold) of the target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100886 Bug ID: 100886 Summary: Variable character pointer within a Fortran derived type can't determine the shape(mold) of the target Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug target/100887] New: [12 Regression] ICE: in ix86_expand_vector_init_concat, at config/i386/i386-expand.c:14178 with -mavx512f and __builtin_shufflevector()

model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210602 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug rtl-optimization/100264] REE does not work on PARALLEL expressions with a single register SET child

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100264 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5ba2eaf7032f234fdcf11d9cfc513ce7be0a255 commit r12-1168-gd5ba2eaf7032f234fdcf11d9cfc513ce7be0a255 Author: Christoph Muellner Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/100264] REE does not work on PARALLEL expressions with a single register SET child

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100264 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/100706] Invalid instructions in plt calls on PPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100706 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org Reso

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/100194] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_create_temp_array, at fortran/trans-array.c:1351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100194 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- We are hitting the assert 1351 gcc_assert (ss->dimen > 0); in gfc_trans_create_temp_array which does not handle assumed rank yet. (here ss->dimen = -1).

[Bug c/100888] New: ICE: symtab_node::verify failed, symtab_node::verify()

20210602 (experimental) [master revision :5b6bc0f6e:b75978d14fc35981ffd8bf060ee52300db4dae50] (GCC) $ cat mutant.c register __sys_res asm("r10"); r10() {} $ gcc-trunk mutant.c mutant.c:1:10: warning: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘__sys_res’ [-Wimplicit-int] 1 | register __s

[Bug middle-end/100876] -Wmismatched-new-delete should understand placement new when it's not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Target Milestone|---

  1   2   >