[Bug c++/100807] New: initialization of global struct with large array leads to huge assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100807 Bug ID: 100807 Summary: initialization of global struct with large array leads to huge assembly Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: comp

[Bug c/100808] New: PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 Bug ID: 100808 Summary: PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c A

[Bug c++/61592] ICE with large array with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at gyoo dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/77443] Empty initializer on huge object array member slow down the compilation dramatically with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77443 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) Thanks for the comments! > There's predictive commoning which can do similar transforms and runs after > vectorization. It might be it doesn't handle these "simple

[Bug c++/80272] g++ runs out of memory with aggregate init of large std::array of non-trivial class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c++/61592] ICE with large array with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkropki at yahoo dot co.uk --- Comment #

[Bug c++/100807] initialization of global struct with large array leads to huge assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100807 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61592] ICE with large array with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 100807 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #20 from Martin Liška --- > I'm trying to understand line #22 to #26 specifically of .c.gcov file(as > shown in commment #16. Let me know if the steps followed in compilation or > execution had any thing wrong. What is wrong with th

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 > > --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) >

[Bug c++/100809] New: PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 Bug ID: 100809 Summary: PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 --- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert --- Same applies to modulo.

[Bug target/100771] Types differ between i386-elf and x86_64-elf -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100771 Paul Menzel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmenzel+gcc at molgen dot mpg.de --- Com

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- Thanks for the bug report. This is reproducible. Will look into it.

[Bug tree-optimization/100810] New: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

gcc version 12.0.0 20210528 (experimental) [master revision 4774807e6e5:0e2d976f72b:cd62d089f6021fd1ad4537b8182836d15b14514f] (GCC) [512] % [512] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out [513] % [513] % gcctk -O1 small.c [514] % ./a.out Aborted [515] % [515] % cat small.c int a, b = 1, c = 1, e, f = 1, g, h

[Bug c++/95719] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 commit r9-9558-gebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 Author: Jason Merrill D

[Bug c++/100797] [9/10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 commit r9-9558-gebfe8b28d40746ff33724bd5b9ade2552e619213 Author: Jason Merrill D

[Bug tree-optimization/100810] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-397-gda9e6e63d1ae22e530ec7baf59f6ed028bf05776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code at -O1 and above |[12 Regression] wrong code

[Bug middle-end/99928] [OpenMP] reduction variable in combined target construct wrongly mapped as firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c94424b0ed786ec92b6904da69af8b5243b34fdc commit r12-1109-gc94424b0ed786ec92b6904da69af8b5243b34fdc Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #21 from Gejoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20) > > I'm trying to understand line #22 to #26 specifically of .c.gcov file(as > > shown in commment #16. Let me know if the steps followed in compilation or > > execution

[Bug tree-optimization/100774] [12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=ranger-trace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100774 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #2) > I have a fix for this... > Do we add -fcompare-debug tests into the testsuite? I don't see any other > tests with it. Sure we do, grep will show quite some.

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|12.0| Summary|[11 Regression] Ge

[Bug target/100782] [11 Regression] sh4 ICEs on -O2 -fPIE -fstack-protector: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100782 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2

[Bug target/100784] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, contains_struct_check(tree_node*, tree_node_structure_enum, char const*, int, char const*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100784 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: Segmentation fault,|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug ipa/100791] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |ipa Version|tree-ssa

[Bug c++/100796] [11 Regression] GCC does not honor #pragma diagnostic ignored when using the integrated preprocessor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Version|unknown

[Bug c++/100797] [10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regr

[Bug tree-optimization/100801] Aggressive loop optimizations cause incorrect warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ipa |tree-optimization Keywords|

[Bug c/100803] ICE on gimple code: in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree, at gimple-expr.c:566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug gcov-profile/100788] Internal compiler error related to #line macros(?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100788 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug ipa/100791] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 > > > > --- Comment #2 from Kewen Lin --- > > (

[Bug target/100811] New: Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 Bug ID: 100811 Summary: Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #22 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2a913c76f41692fd0bb955d1768f462133d813a commit r12--gd2a913c76f41692fd0bb955d1768f462133d813a Author: Martin Liska Date: Fr

[Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #23 from Martin Liška --- > So, for either a one time call of __gcov_dump (though we may attempt to call > __gcov_dump many times) or at the exit of the program execution, the merge > of profile happens due to which __gcov_reset doe

[Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug tree-optimization/100794] suboptimal code due to missing pre2 when vectorization fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 28 May 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100794 > > --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3

[Bug c/100803] ICE on gimple code: in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree, at gimple-expr.c:566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b2b32ab2d8cff4eb0dad0ef4e72e33257574cb6 commit r12-1112-g8b2b32ab2d8cff4eb0dad0ef4e72e33257574cb6 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ipa/100791] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:359c0a86e2974a9f3036bc05b6e6c661f2c463cf commit r12-1113-g359c0a86e2974a9f3036bc05b6e6c661f2c463cf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c/100803] ICE on gimple code: in gimple_cond_get_ops_from_tree, at gimple-expr.c:566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/100791] [10/11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: verify_gimple failed |[10/11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug tree-optimization/100801] Aggressive loop optimizations cause incorrect warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100801 --- Comment #2 from Joel Linn --- Great. In the meantime I will use > if (count % 4 == 0) __builtin_unreachable(); at the start of the for loop to suppress the warning as suggested by Martin Sebor https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/2021-May

[Bug c++/95719] [10/11 Regression] ICE in lookup_vfn_in_binfo at gcc/cp/class.c:2459 since r11-954-g0ddb93ce77374004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95719 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c commit r12-1114-gf838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug c++/100797] [10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c commit r12-1114-gf838e3ccf8d2849980e9d0f70aa60ecd2eb5772c Author: Jason Merrill Date: T

[Bug c++/100797] [10/11/12 Regression] using declaration causing virtual call with wrongly adjusted this pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100797 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/100812] New: [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 Bug ID: 100812 Summary: [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7a07f5a5d8065e7f11133dd1f4ad3510ab2195b commit r12-1115-gf7a07f5a5d8065e7f11133dd1f4ad3510ab2195b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The fix pushed is for a related issue only, still working on the actual issue.

[Bug lto/100812] [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu |

[Bug fortran/100813] New: Function of array of pointers to abstract class returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100813 Bug ID: 100813 Summary: Function of array of pointers to abstract class returning an array Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100814] New: Fortran memory error on assignment from polymorphic variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100814 Bug ID: 100814 Summary: Fortran memory error on assignment from polymorphic variable Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100811] Consider not omitting frame pointers by default on targets with many registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100811 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also on say PowerPC, not omitting the frame pointer gives no benifit whats so ever really with respect to backtracing.

[Bug c/100808] PPC: ISA 3.1 builtin documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100808 --- Comment #1 from Jens Seifert --- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/PowerPC-AltiVec-Built-in-Functions-Available-on-ISA-3_002e1.html vector unsigned long long int vec_gnb (vector unsigned __int128, const unsigned char) should be unsigned

[Bug libstdc++/100479] range adaptors handle cached iterators incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100479 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49f369fb33fb5bed4dadfb5b42b23cded888ab52 commit r11-8476-g49f369fb33fb5bed4dadfb5b42b23cded888ab52 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/100502] [11/12 Regression] ICE in enforce_access at cp/semantics.c:368 since r11-6800-g29853c653245c37e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100502 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:365deb8399262033ac766b924c35d31db3d621ca commit r11-8475-g365deb8399262033ac766b924c35d31db3d621ca Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/100502] [11/12 Regression] ICE in enforce_access at cp/semantics.c:368 since r11-6800-g29853c653245c37e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100502 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/100812] [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Component|lto

[Bug ipa/100812] [10 Regression] lto1-wpa memory hog building openjdk trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100812 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- adding -fno-ipa-icf or -fno-ipa-sra, or both flags makes a difference

[Bug fortran/100815] New: [11 regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815 Bug ID: 100815 Summary: [11 regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug target/79173] add-with-carry and subtract-with-borrow support (x86_64 and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconf

[Bug fortran/100815] [10.3, 11 regression] Segfault assigning to scalar allocatable polymorphic LHS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815 --- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson --- Actually it looks like the regression was introduced in 10.3. It works in 10.2 and earlier.

[Bug fortran/100816] New: Wrong span on widechar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100816 Bug ID: 100816 Summary: Wrong span on widechar Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assigne

[Bug c++/100805] __int128 should be disabled for non-extended -std= options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100805 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #2) > __int128 behaves mostly like an integer type but is not an "extended integer > type" as defined in the standard. Quoting from > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedoc

[Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Grund --- Confirmed to also break with GCC 7.3, 8.2, 8.3 but works with 6.3, 6.4, 6.5

[Bug c/100817] New: ICE with -O2: in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2513

20210528 (experimental) [master revision :0e2d976f7:cd62d089f6021fd1ad4537b8182836d15b14514f] (GCC) $ cat mutant.c a; __attribute__((cold)) b () { for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;) for (; a >= 0;) for (; a;

[Bug middle-end/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-05-26 3:32 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > Attached a possible fix. While the patch fixes boot, pr100619.c fails: spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir64/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdi

[Bug fortran/100818] New: A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Bug ID: 100818 Summary: A temporary is passed to associated Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686|i686, sparc CC|

[Bug fortran/100120] associated intrinsic failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100120 --- Comment #3 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Please ignore anterior patch as it contains really bad errors a corrected one will follow shortly.

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps if EVRP is folding debug stmts it could first fold non-debug stmts (and remember if there were any debug stmts) and only fold debug stmts afterwards, either just by using caches and not adding anythi

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Perhaps if EVRP is folding debug stmts it could first fold non-debug stmts (and remember if there were any debug stmts) and only fold debug stmts afterwards, either just by using caches and not adding anythi

[Bug fortran/100602] [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100602 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb5c89afbe0ef59fa315cbfda31a55ea5d8ca297 commit r11-8478-gcb5c89afbe0ef59fa315cbfda31a55ea5d8ca297 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug libstdc++/100806] deadlock in std::counting_semaphore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100806 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-28 Assignee|unassign

[Bug fortran/100656] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cb4a0db82c51c742961a350c9c7a45ba1fe8475 commit r11-8479-g1cb4a0db82c51c742961a350c9c7a45ba1fe8475 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e9e0798d2242b7908db4098136d0bfd0bc7f0e8 commit r11-8480-g1e9e0798d2242b7908db4098136d0bfd0bc7f0e8 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100602] [11/12 Regression] Erroneous "pointer argument is not associated" runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100602 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |wrong-code Statu

[Bug fortran/100656] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1934

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASS

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:799cf16051844f80d09526f17194373902254708 commit r10-9871-g799cf16051844f80d09526f17194373902254708 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- I found the issue. I will send a fix soon, once testing on powerpc64, x86_64 finishes.

[Bug fortran/100819] New: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100819 Bug ID: 100819 Summary: Wrong code generation with unlimited polymorphic objects and character type Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug bootstrap/100820] New: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Bug ID: 100820 Summary: [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/100821] New: Deferred character with wrong bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100821 Bug ID: 100821 Summary: Deferred character with wrong bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/100820] [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, compile-time-hog Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/100817] ICE with -O2: in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2513

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100817 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- /* Theoretically possible, but *highly* unlikely. */ gcc_checking_assert (num_iterations < 500);

[Bug target/94177] TLS global-dynamic model clobbers function parameter on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94177 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by David Edelsohn : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0be51abf080f1d7515e3777dd5e5a983b47573a8 commit r11-8481-g0be51abf080f1d7515e3777dd5e5a983b47573a8 Author: David Edelsohn

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez --- This temporary fix resolves the bootstrap comparison on i686. Does it also fix it on sparc-32? diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c index 118d10365a0..b40649b6a10 100644 --- a/gcc/gi

[Bug c++/100822] New: new expression for an array of function pointers gets parsed as lambda incorrectly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100822 Bug ID: 100822 Summary: new expression for an array of function pointers gets parsed as lambda incorrectly Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 --- Comment #6 from Firas Khalil Khana --- Thanks for your time.

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2364b584552208ce715fa4fd44c510b7e5210d1e commit r12-1118-g2364b584552208ce715fa4fd44c510b7e5210d1e Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100823] New: Special member functions of common_iterator should be conditionally trivial

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100823 Bug ID: 100823 Summary: Special member functions of common_iterator should be conditionally trivial Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/100787] [12 Regression] Bootstrap failure caused by r12-1077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100787 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez --- Note, this is still broken so I am leaving the PR open. I will address this next week.