https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
--- Comment #14 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Update/correct info:
If bootstrap-O3, the message is "error: method 'foo' is ambiguous".
It is "error: type has no method 'foo'".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
--- Comment #15 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #9)
> Yes,
>
> diff --git a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc
> index 5d9dbb5d068..32637a44af1 100644
> --- a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc
> +++ b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc
> @@ -1680,6 +168
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:810afb0b5fbb9da1e0e51ee9607f275f14c17459
commit r12-762-g810afb0b5fbb9da1e0e51ee9607f275f14c17459
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100569
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3e02c2e442e6b0c298dbe769e0e3b120b5201b2
commit r12-766-gc3e02c2e442e6b0c298dbe769e0e3b120b5201b2
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
Bug ID: 100581
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770
since r12-731-gb1f7fd8a2a5558da
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Playing with the testcase show that the patch in comment#3 is incomplete.
Next try:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
index cce18d094a6..3de53009970 100644
--- a/gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100578
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100580
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-13
Summary|ICE with -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
--- Comment #12 from Petr Sumbera ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #11)
> Can you post the contents of $(srcdir)/gcc/config/sparc/t-sol2 in your setup?
$ cat gcc-11.1.0/gcc/config/sparc/t-sol2
MULTILIB_OPTIONS = m32/m64
MULTILIB_DIRN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #1)
> Is it valid to create a vector type with total size less than the element
> size? Shouldn't this be rejected?
No, the generated code is:
vmovq ff_b(%rip)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
When describing the vector_size attribute,
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Vector-Extensions.html says:
> Only sizes that are positive power-of-two multiples of the base type size are
> currently allowed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
--- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan ---
Agh, I just remembered that the size is in bytes rather than bits, sorry for
the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||sparcv9-sun-solaris2.*
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
--- Comment #14 from Petr Sumbera ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #13)
> > $ cat gcc-11.1.0/gcc/config/sparc/t-sol2
> > MULTILIB_OPTIONS = m32/m64
> > MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 32 sparcv9
> > MULTILIB_MATCHES =
> > MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES = .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100582
Bug ID: 100582
Summary: vectorize failed to generate VEC_COND_EXPR for v32qi
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #14 from Petr Sumbera ---
[...]
> It has following comment:
>
> # We want sparc/i386 to match locations for their 32 bit support when
> building
> # multilib. For now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
--- Comment #16 from Petr Sumbera ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #15)
> > --- Comment #14 from Petr Sumbera ---
> [...]
> > It has following comment:
> >
> > # We want sparc/i386 to match locations for their 32 bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100582
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Also for short, not optimal for int.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1693741cb2b2db519bb82155a3c0880fd820ea3
commit r12-768-gf1693741cb2b2db519bb82155a3c0880fd820ea3
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100572
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
Hmm, it looks like binutils might be wrong here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100581
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #15)
> Bug first appears sometime between git hash 21dfb22920ce32fc,
> dated yesterday and git hash 097fde5e7514e909, dated today.
Fixed by PR100581.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100572
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856
--- Comment #40 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:829c4bea06600ea4201462f91ce6d76ca21fdb35
commit r12-769-g829c4bea06600ea4201462f91ce6d76ca21fdb35
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a451598b2c02e1ca3c62fea272d73a9f31922252
commit r12-770-ga451598b2c02e1ca3c62fea272d73a9f31922252
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] arm: |[10/11 Regression] arm: ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100583
Bug ID: 100583
Summary: [modules] ICE when importing
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100584
Bug ID: 100584
Summary: [modules] ICE when using import ; with
std::jthread
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99933
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 99933, which changed state.
Bug 99933 Summary: gcc/brig/brigfrontend/brig-function.cc: 4 * possible
performance problem ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99933
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100585
Bug ID: 100585
Summary: Osx 10.7 Lion Make failed : uninitialized cost member,
many errors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100585
--- Comment #1 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
Created attachment 50807
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50807&action=edit
my-configure.log Lion v. 11.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100585
--- Comment #2 from bug-reports.delphin at laposte dot net ---
Created attachment 50808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50808&action=edit
my-make.log Lion v. 11.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
I proposed a patch to address this on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570267.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100439
--- Comment #5 from Florin Iucha ---
It is a "CMake object library" - not a static library.
I will prepare a more self-contained test case shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100586
Bug ID: 100586
Summary: g++: error: unrecognized command-line option
‘-fump-tree-original’; did you mean
‘-fdump-d-original’?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86385
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-07-03 00:00:00 |2021-5-13
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I proposed a patch to address this on the mailing list:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570267.html
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100487
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100575
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100587
Bug ID: 100587
Summary: std::range::empty_view is not a view
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efd471a980662f113dad8de0c0ef8593d0d38419
commit r12-772-gefd471a980662f113dad8de0c0ef8593d0d38419
Author: Richard Earnshaw
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecfb8658c04114d87e1000f9924d6c373df0e7fd
commit r11-8408-gecfb8658c04114d87e1000f9924d6c373df0e7fd
Author: Richard Earn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d1a690b4dfa224228151fed4bed47c7fe412e0b
commit r10-9821-g1d1a690b4dfa224228151fed4bed47c7fe412e0b
Author: Richard Earn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100587
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100588
Bug ID: 100588
Summary: Destroying delete shouldn't be called if constructor
throws
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100589
Bug ID: 100589
Summary: function with trailing return type must specify return
type 'auto' instead of 'concept auto'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d80aeff0bf2f455e9099def756f612bfbcd2cb0d
commit r12-773-gd80aeff0bf2f455e9099def756f612bfbcd2cb0d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100588
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100439
--- Comment #6 from Florin Iucha ---
With the test file above, and this Makefile:
--8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8< --8<
ALL: bin/test_hello
.PHONY: clean
CXX=/opt/tng-gcc11-glibc-linux5.4/bin/x86_64-tng-linux-gnu-g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100439
--- Comment #7 from Florin Iucha ---
Created attachment 50809
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50809&action=edit
crosstool-ng configuration file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559
--- Comment #17 from Petr Sumbera ---
(In reply to Petr Sumbera from comment #16)
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #15)
> > I'd seen that change before in solaris-userland, but never understood
> > the point. Those dir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100419
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac5bab25cfd99dd530c8c83992d81e2c88e543d0
commit r11-8409-gac5bab25cfd99dd530c8c83992d81e2c88e543d0
Author: Srinath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100419
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:788f9c8e0c271bcd38049e1c87cda087f449f655
commit r10-9822-g788f9c8e0c271bcd38049e1c87cda087f449f655
Author: Srinath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100550
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:957c437363f139313b2c0b2c93ca985df1d98ad2
commit r12-774-g957c437363f139313b2c0b2c93ca985df1d98ad2
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100419
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100590
Bug ID: 100590
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: too many outgoing
branch edges from bb 2)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100550
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4415051422690e6eda2ff6644b4f35432fcd7707
commit r11-8410-g4415051422690e6eda2ff6644b4f35432fcd7707
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100550
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100504
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9feb5822b713c6a12cb290ba0406ba2362d4c09c
commit r12-777-g9feb5822b713c6a12cb290ba0406ba2362d4c09c
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100591
Bug ID: 100591
Summary: -fsanitize=undefined fails to detect undefined
floating to integer conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100590
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE: verify_flow_info |[11/12 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100444
--- Comment #12 from Edward Cree ---
A datum: booting with 'nordrand' on the kernel command line does not affect
this, the test program still prints 4294967295. (Yet '/proc/cpuinfo' no longer
mentions rdrand or rdseed in flags. Stdlib must be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100585
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bug-reports.delphin@laposte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 50810
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50810&action=edit
Fortran version of the C testcases (see comment 7 for notes)
Fortran conversion of the C/C++ testcases of comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100578
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100512
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
*** Bug 100578 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #7)
> Created attachment 50810 [details]
> Fortran version of the C testcases (see comment 7 for notes)
>
> Fortran conversion of the C/C++ testcases of comment 7 /
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
--- Comment #61 from abebeos at lazaridis dot com ---
Now, the headline would be:
"Physik FU-Berlin, Microchip, Google, RedHat, IBM and more to Support Abuse,
Discrimination and even 'IT-fascism' via/on GCC/GNU/FSF Project-Resources".
See, nobod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca9bb74a5f856ccdceb4797f18b0a4ac8f49d069
commit r12-782-gca9bb74a5f856ccdceb4797f18b0a4ac8f49d069
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98583
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2efe245bb88bf4574e322ef7e6d2df83d9e13237
commit r12-783-g2efe245bb88bf4574e322ef7e6d2df83d9e13237
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2efe245bb88bf4574e322ef7e6d2df83d9e13237
commit r12-783-g2efe245bb88bf4574e322ef7e6d2df83d9e13237
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5380e3c137b2bb63acd789cd09d01a4edc0a01c3
commit r12-784-g5380e3c137b2bb63acd789cd09d01a4edc0a01c3
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE: in |[11 Regression] ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 93100, which changed state.
Bug 93100 Summary: gcc -fsanitize=address inhibits -Wuninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93100
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98583
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 98583, which changed state.
Bug 98583 Summary: missing -Wuninitialized reading from a second VLA in its own
block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98583
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100592
Bug ID: 100592
Summary: Bogus "qualifiers cannot be applied" error with
reference type produced by dependent alias template
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593
Bug ID: 100593
Summary: [ELF] -fno-pic: Use GOT to take address of an external
default visibility function
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Another request is a new option: -fno-semantic-interposition-function. With
this option, we only assume functions cannot be interposed.
-fno-semantic-interposition assumes both functions and variables cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99032
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:149061188c7c6ddf27663c8c00b7574fc8d0fd23
commit r12-786-g149061188c7c6ddf27663c8c00b7574fc8d0fd23
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
Bug ID: 100594
Summary: Lambdas in unevaluated contexts interact oddly with
alias templates
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-14
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, there are two flavors of failures being diagnosed by the test case.
The first flavor involves the lower bounds of an array passed into a bind(c)
procedure being set to zero in the callee when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100595
Bug ID: 100595
Summary: ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
96 matches
Mail list logo