https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100436
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100436
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #2)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #1)
> > Oh, I see, the reason is that std::ranges::__detail::__is_integer_like
> > is set to false since gcc-11.
>
> This is just the implementation o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98694
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100437
Bug ID: 100437
Summary: libiberty: Support more characters for function clones
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86387
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91400
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0b4e09ab0102d9c0a5e6d603a080cb78600c40d
commit r12-524-ga0b4e09ab0102d9c0a5e6d603a080cb78600c40d
Author: Ivan Sorokin
Date: Mon May 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99893
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100438
Bug ID: 100438
Summary: `_serialize` macro clashes with user defined
identifiers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100438
--- Comment #1 from heinzisoft at web dot de ---
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/788403
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba013672f723f87f0c3b0c685dda5b3b2f1b3f3a
commit r11-8357-gba013672f723f87f0c3b0c685dda5b3b2f1b3f3a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100439
Bug ID: 100439
Summary: stack overflow running ubsan
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100404
Philip Lorenz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 100430, which changed state.
Bug 100430 Summary: False positive for -Warray-bounds and pointers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100404
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
EFAULT is always optional. POSIX is clear about that:
[EFAULT]
Bad address. The system detected an invalid address in attempting to use an
argument of a call. The reliable detection of this error cannot b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92fef3f29917407a31c58c1c06203e4fbe7d4319
commit r10-9803-g92fef3f29917407a31c58c1c06203e4fbe7d4319
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100170
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4a21a07125f73543ccc08fd96d4c41f37b6bd5d
commit r9-9514-gd4a21a07125f73543ccc08fd96d4c41f37b6bd5d
Author: Harald Anlauf
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
Nick Desaulniers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100404
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is a way from keeping the compiler from knowing what the value of the
incoming pointer is to hide it behind an inline-asm which does nothing:
int __attribute__ ((nonnull)) isnull(char *ptr) {
asm("
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_compute_frame_layout): For a SEH target,
always return the establisher frame for __builtin_frame_address
(0).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20210505-1.c: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440
Bug ID: 100440
Summary: allocated() gives True for unallocated variable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> Created attachment 50759 [details]
> updated patch
>
> Fixed missing setting of wi.stmt in lower_emutls_phi_arg
I regstrapped r12-248+ first patch (I added th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100440
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100441
Bug ID: 100441
Summary: [ICE] output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3955
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100266
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1fcf14f33e4f371aae8ae497ca58a760d53ca6d
commit r12-527-ge1fcf14f33e4f371aae8ae497ca58a760d53ca6d
Author: Christoph Muellner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Ilya Leoshkevich
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:445ce3cfb6832ec838caa10f2337c3bd00213517
commit r11-8360-g445ce3cfb6832ec838caa10f2337c3bd00213517
Author: Ilya Leoshk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99692
Sergey Kaniskin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #8 from Sergey Kaniski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100342
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100432
--- Comment #2 from xicojovor at dropjar dot com ---
The minimal example is:
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
void* get_self_address(void)
{
return (void*)get_self_address;
}
compiled with -marm -Os -fPIC
working good (maybe not the bes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100442
Bug ID: 100442
Summary: Spurious -Wstringop-overread error with odd boundaries
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100435
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I think it's just an omission and indeed a bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |target
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100441
--- Comment #2 from tim blechmann ---
i've been able to reproduce this on a raspberry pi running ubuntu:
```
ubuntu@pi4:~/scratch$ g++-10 x.i -S -fpermissive -w -O -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-10
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
Configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100443
Bug ID: 100443
Summary: member using declaration of function templates with
different return types does not bring base class
overload into derived class
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
Reduced C code:
int kgd_get_dense_grid_point_double_mesh_mesh_i;
int kgd_get_dense_grid_point_double_mesh_mesh_address[3];
kgd_get_dense_grid_point_double_mesh_mesh() {
for (; kgd_get_dense_grid_point_
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
