https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100428
Bug ID: 100428
Summary: [nvptx, GOMP_NVPTX_JIT=-O0] FAIL:
libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-
7.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100428
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Likewise, c++:
...
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-7.c
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0 -foffload=nvptx-none -O0
execution test
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Alan Modra posted the following alternate patch (which I will test with a
clang-3.5 bootstrap):
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
index 97d6f3863cb..cc3b1b6d666 100644
--- a/gcc/con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100429
Bug ID: 100429
Summary: threading support on windows
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100429
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
if (TlsSetValue (__key, (void*) __ptr) != 0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100394
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ebf6b99952ada09bf9ea0144dcd1d46363b0464
commit r12-475-g8ebf6b99952ada09bf9ea0144dcd1d46363b0464
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79333
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d846f225c25c5885250c303c8d118caa08c447ab
commit r12-476-gd846f225c25c5885250c303c8d118caa08c447ab
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100394
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100409
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
After the PR100394 fix this is now the prevailing issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79333
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-05-01 00:00:00 |2021-05-05
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100422
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af4e4d35f0b84d7c2f57a7b682a09116e9911142
commit r12-477-gaf4e4d35f0b84d7c2f57a7b682a09116e9911142
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100422
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100417
--- Comment #3 from jkb at sanger dot ac.uk ---
I'd definitely be in favour of John's rewording of the warning - "data pointed
to by ...". This definitely led us up the garden path for a while.
While I agree the code could have been written dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50756
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50756&action=edit
patch
This patch survives the new testcase with a cc1 cross to darwin and it does
produce expected results wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0302c041b108cf680189bd8e79e9d4478c4e22c
commit r11-8349-ga0302c041b108cf680189bd8e79e9d4478c4e22c
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100414
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12ff76b01f07fff049cbfeb0ef536ce42f1f178b
commit r11-8350-g12ff76b01f07fff049cbfeb0ef536ce42f1f178b
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100308
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d941869a62060182d5ffe265144bdd87d8943c7a
commit r11-8351-gd941869a62060182d5ffe265144bdd87d8943c7a
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ac56ea477ec72340ebbce44af93c7712b579109
commit r11-8352-g3ac56ea477ec72340ebbce44af93c7712b579109
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c980fbf5505dc2f50136d501b67dc3fbf4b08b0d
commit r11-8353-gc980fbf5505dc2f50136d501b67dc3fbf4b08b0d
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
Bug 98786 depends on bug 100414, which changed state.
Bug 100414 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in dominated_by_p, at dominance.c:1120
with -O -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100414
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
Bug ID: 100430
Summary: False positive for -Warray-bounds and pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1807c381d5dee44f24a07472d350a58f016cd5f5
commit r8-10950-g1807c381d5dee44f24a07472d350a58f016cd5f5
Author: Alex Coplan
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 100230, which changed state.
Bug 100230 Summary: ASan: alloc-dealloc-mismatch in early-remat.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100230
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100278
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd475d14d880f17f2491b9488ba776479934a47a
commit r10-9799-gbd475d14d880f17f2491b9488ba776479934a47a
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:329f730fd1daa7cdae4a637244d4e215f9bb9a8c
commit r10-9800-g329f730fd1daa7cdae4a637244d4e215f9bb9a8c
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100419
SRINATH PARVATHANENI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61cf7ddeae6d13c81498088c1c643ca47fdbde2c
commit r9-9512-g61cf7ddeae6d13c81498088c1c643ca47fdbde2c
Author: Richard Biener
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS
(code=1, address=0x0)
frame #0: 0x0001016a4bb3 cc1`::gimple_code(g=0x) at
gimple.h:1782
1779 static inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs ---
Alexandre's patch has this:
emit_move_insn (rem, plus_constant (ptr_mode, rem, -blksize));
Is that generally a valid thing to do? It seems like other places do similar
things...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a121f0c20f490ff03f78e7f3f8a22ab9b2bbac9
commit r8-10951-g1a121f0c20f490ff03f78e7f3f8a22ab9b2bbac9
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||8.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||56456
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> The IL looks like the warning is justified:
The memcpy call is dead code, we just fail to notice it.
>[local count: 230225493]:
> # prephitmp_42 = PHI <_6(4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
So, apart from the small missed PHI optimization, this is probably the common
issue that since operator new is replacable, we can't really assume that it
does not clobber anything, and that hurts optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
It seems to help if we save the values before the allocation in vector.tcc,
although I cannot promise it won't pessimize something else... And that's just
a workaround, not a solution.
@@ -766,13 +766,16 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100431
Bug ID: 100431
Summary: Fixes to enable compiling with -Werror=format-security
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100431
--- Comment #1 from Joey Dumont ---
Created attachment 50758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50758&action=edit
Workaround for -Wno-format flag injected during build process.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100428
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||nvptx
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
--- Comment #2 from Jens Maurer ---
Why does the warning go away with -O3, then? If it's intentional, it should be
consistent once the optimization level is sufficient for the necessary static
analysis.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100428
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
The ptx code looks a lot like the cuda reproducer in PR99932 comment 4, so I'm
going to retest this once I get a driver where that one is fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> - emit_move_insn (rem, plus_constant (ptr_mode, rem, -blksize));
> + rtx rem_minus_blksize = plus_constant (ptr_mode, rem, -blksize);
> + emit_mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100373
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50756|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100429
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #0)
> It looks like libgcc DOES provide threading support for windows. However,
> _GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS does not get defined for libstdc++, I guess it is
> another libtoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is weird. I think normally during expansion all the needed clobbers are
added while expanding RTL, rather than waiting until the first pass that calls
recog (that is during the vregs pass I think).
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366
--- Comment #8 from Sam Varshavchik ---
If the warning is spurious, then changing vector.tcc won't, of course, keep it
from popping up elsewhere when the same sequence of events get triggered.
Here, it drew my attention to the missed micro-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100432
Bug ID: 100432
Summary: gcc arm compilation binary output is bigger with -Os
than -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87808
--- Comment #8 from leonard at lausen dot nl ---
Is there any blocker preventing the patch to be merged?
This bug can be easily reproduced by masquerading gcc binary with ccache
compiler cache. ln -s ccache /usr/local/bin/gcc See
https://ccache.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91598
--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon ---
All intrinsics have been re-implemented, and I can see no asm version in
arm_neon.h as of r12-513.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100433
Bug ID: 100433
Summary: [modules] segfault with optimization greater than -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90219
Timm Bäder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100379
vvinayag at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vvinayag at arm dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3661f2d63fbc5fd30c24d22137691e16b0a0a17
commit r12-514-gf3661f2d63fbc5fd30c24d22137691e16b0a0a17
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8b79cc939d6786293f654c42a2d1b0ab040de0e
commit r12-515-ga8b79cc939d6786293f654c42a2d1b0ab040de0e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48358
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Bug 48335 depends on bug 48358, which changed state.
Bug 48358 Summary: TREE_ADDRESSABLE overloading issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48358
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98375
Bug 98375 depends on bug 98218, which changed state.
Bug 98218 Summary: [TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE] Miss vec_cmpmn/vcondmn expander for
64bit vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98218
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100418
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Stubbs ---
I found a couple of other places to put force_operand and the full case works
now.
Running more tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44462
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So we now (GCC 8+ at least) get
:
_1 = i_am_pure (5);
a_8 = _1 * 2;
i_am_pure (8);
return a_8;
after early DCE. This is because we now do FRE before the first DCE which
4.5 didn't have (4.8 has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100434
Bug ID: 100434
Summary: DSE fails to DSE aggregate LHS.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
--- Comment #7 from Liu Hao ---
Does this affect other `-mtune=` values too? I am thinking about
`--with-tune=ivybridge`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Does this affect other `-mtune=` values too? I am thinking about
> `--with-tune=ivybridge`.
It's accidental, so only testing can give the answer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100432
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100435
Bug ID: 100435
Summary: oddity in hash table use in libcpp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100417
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfd2c92f3f5d204619bd218aa72b162997690796
commit r12-517-gdfd2c92f3f5d204619bd218aa72b162997690796
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcb23f439f3cf5601fb8bf49889accd16f3b30a1
commit r11-8354-gdcb23f439f3cf5601fb8bf49889accd16f3b30a1
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100411
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb283170e7a1f39bf533651418daf10ad18eccfc
commit r12-518-gbb283170e7a1f39bf533651418daf10ad18eccfc
Author: Stefan Sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fcad2894215879b740dce74e72247b6efa326397
commit r11-8355-gfcad2894215879b740dce74e72247b6efa326397
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3a6a7f0dcd3e0775c700b4a06320ac911a2c5b5
commit r10-9801-ga3a6a7f0dcd3e0775c700b4a06320ac911a2c5b5
Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7bd91c7e059ee24bcf991d503bcd9856618a670
commit r9-9513-gd7bd91c7e059ee24bcf991d503bcd9856618a670
Author: St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100342
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50761&action=edit
gcc11-pr100342.patch
Untested fix. But what do I know about regcprop?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06d75273ff7bb7af72ae83abef858c079245b602
commit r8-10952-g06d75273ff7bb7af72ae83abef858c079245b602
Author: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100402
--- Comment #11 from Hannes Domani ---
> Your testcase does not compile with the C compiler:
>
> Compiling it with the C++ compiler works for me:
Sorry about the c/c++ confusion.
> Created attachment 50754 [details]
> Tentative fix
>
> Plea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97903
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d9937da063e5847f45f7f1f7a02bed7dbc8fb2f6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100436
Bug ID: 100436
Summary: std::views::iota(0, true) is well-formed
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100436
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
Oh, I see, the reason is that std::ranges::__detail::__is_integer_like is
set to false since gcc-11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100429
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100423
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-05
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100421
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96745
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc_report_187375@mailfence
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100430
--- Comment #4 from Jens Maurer ---
Thanks.
My take-away from the discussion is that -Warray-bounds triggers when there
might be a code path with bad behavior. Whether such a code path is detected
depends very much on the details of optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100325
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2254b3233b5bfa690e8c6e6fa923e4626a6a93d3
commit r12-523-g2254b3233b5bfa690e8c6e6fa923e4626a6a93d3
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100325
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741
Bug 85741 depends on bug 100325, which changed state.
Bug 100325 Summary: missing warning with -O0 on sprintf overflow with pointer
plus offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100325
What|Removed |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
--- Comment #14 from Willy Tarreau ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #13)
> The patch was rejected so we'll have to live with a confusing warning.
sadly it's not the first one and I don't count the number of bugs I have
introduced in my
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
