https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100320
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Bug ID: 100329
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 3
does not dominate use in block 4)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #2 from Tor ---
Same issue on gcc-11.1.0. Can't pick D language on x86_64/amd64 platform.
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/home/torel/workspace/GCC/gcc-11_1_0-release/Build-x86_64/x86_64-linux-gnu/zlib'
make[2]: Entering directory
'/ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100323
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
/bin/sh: ../libtool: No such file or directory
that's odd. What's your host operating system, in particular what shell
is /bin/sh?
You'd need to see what (and why) libphobos picks up as @LIBTOOL@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100326
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Possibly
if (!targetm.scalar_mode_supported_p (mode)
|| !targetm.libgcc_floating_mode_supported_p (mode))
continue;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #4 from Tor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> that's odd. What's your host operating system, in particular what shell
> is /bin/sh?
Ubuntu 18.04.5LTS on any arch. Interestingly, on aarch it is dash while on
where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61592
Bence Szabó changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbence92 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100232
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d7c874e2c64ebf7631049ace642d246843febae
commit r12-249-g4d7c874e2c64ebf7631049ace642d246843febae
Author: Tom de Vries
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Tor from comment #0)
> make -j 64
>
Never had an issue with parallel builds up to -j16. Won't have the hardware to
even attempt -j64 for another fortnight.
Minimal libtool support is in libphobo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #101 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c57a8aea0c3ab8394f7dbfa417ee27b4613f63b7
commit r12-280-gc57a8aea0c3ab8394f7dbfa417ee27b4613f63b7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd0a059bd384da58d43674496a79ecb7de610800
commit r11-8323-gcd0a059bd384da58d43674496a79ecb7de610800
Author: Richard Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100270
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfaa29b5441689ce05e3c09012d3afe269770e94
commit r11-8322-gdfaa29b5441689ce05e3c09012d3afe269770e94
Author: Richard San
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100232
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Tom de Vries
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f94c6caac7f03815c26c03a532f834c37517519c
commit r11-8324-gf94c6caac7f03815c26c03a532f834c37517519c
Author: Tom de Vries
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaron at aarongraham dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100232
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100319
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b462deabf70e0f4bebb1f85118827d9c2eeffb5
commit r12-281-g1b462deabf70e0f4bebb1f85118827d9c2eeffb5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #0)
> For most comparisons @ we do optimize (i<=>0)@0 to just i@0, but not for >
> and <=. Spaceship operator<=> is very painful to use, but I expect we will
> end up s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100330
Bug ID: 100330
Summary: operator bool() is used when operator<() is available
to do comparison
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100302
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bb3e2c0ce6ed363c72caf814a6ba6d7b17c3e0a
commit r12-282-g1bb3e2c0ce6ed363c72caf814a6ba6d7b17c3e0a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100319
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50c826db7a3ee672be2a0b41a937651e1834a837
commit r11-8325-g50c826db7a3ee672be2a0b41a937651e1834a837
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100302
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ac1313f32c5cd875ad047f6575dd4608e1949cf
commit r11-8326-g5ac1313f32c5cd875ad047f6575dd4608e1949cf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100302
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100319
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a44a9797edce11b1f7051ea0016ee975d41233
commit r12-283-g62a44a9797edce11b1f7051ea0016ee975d41233
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is we're getting a dataref pointer like
&MEM <__int128 unsigned> [(char * {ref-all})&s + 25B]
and the first access has DR_MISALIGNMENT of 9 and the target alignment is 16.
So we have
align =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a515ce926b9d779922debc33ecad424c9ac22c65
commit r11-8327-ga515ce926b9d779922debc33ecad424c9ac22c65
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #6 from Tor ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #5)
> Never had an issue with parallel builds up to -j16. Won't have the hardware
> to even attempt -j64 for another fortnight.
>
> Minimal libtool support is in libphobos/m4/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99954
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab620c241b61733c92a7596620b73af4f380b5e0
commit r8-10928-gab620c241b61733c92a7596620b73af4f380b5e0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100330
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
#include
extern "C" int puts(const char*);
struct vertex_descriptor {
operator bool() const {
puts(__func__);
return i;
}
bool operato
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
--- Comment #13 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> For valgrind, the quick workaround would be -march=z13 when compiling the
> s390x tests that have register long double variables.
Yes, this works, if fpext an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
--- Comment #6 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
Some key steps in the optimization:
PRE turns PHI<-1,0,1> > 0 into PHI<0,0,1>
reassoc then combines the operations (it didn't in gcc-10)
forwprop+phiopt cleans up (i>0)!=0?1:0 into just i>0.
Having to wait unt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100331
Bug ID: 100331
Summary: 128 bit arithmetic --- suboptimal after shifting when
referencing other variables
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
PR96480 would be my guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Not sure what fixed it there.
Seems to be r11-2593
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8)
> PR96480 would be my guess.
Yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
>
> --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
> Some key steps in the optimization:
> PRE tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af4ccaa7515b8e72449448c509916575831e6292
commit r12-284-gaf4ccaa7515b8e72449448c509916575831e6292
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.0
Summary|[10/11/12 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100332
Bug ID: 100332
Summary: mcore-elf: error: 'prev_addr' may be used
uninitialized in this function
[-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Target Milestone|11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100311
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bda407c9a0da4aacdc62306c85712b93afa1bbc3
commit r11-8328-gbda407c9a0da4aacdc62306c85712b93afa1bbc3
Author: Richard Earn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100311
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0ae39ce2c3b4d635de6102ec3750cf6109cdc8d
commit r10-9778-gd0ae39ce2c3b4d635de6102ec3750cf6109cdc8d
Author: Richard Earn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100324
--- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> /bin/sh: ../libtool: No such file or directory
>
> that's odd. What's your host operating system, in particular what shell
> is /bin/sh?
>
> You'd need to see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100311
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 100311, which changed state.
Bug 100311 Summary: UB in sel-sched.c:init_regs_for_mode with
-march=armv8-m.base
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100311
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100173
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> but yes, cselim will also sink the first store, moving it across the
Can we also sink loads? assign pointer to another temp pointer in both if and
else bb, and then load val from this temp pointer. those a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11)
> For PR7
> I have prototyped a forwprop patch to try constant folding
> stmts with all-constant PHIs, thus in this case c$_M_value_2 > 0,
> when there's o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e54a34eed4f941cf09f27245bb3a5bfdb406a16
commit r11-8330-g4e54a34eed4f941cf09f27245bb3a5bfdb406a16
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b6fecd9e594c7342141c334644d3938c8e5fcdb
commit r10-9780-g9b6fecd9e594c7342141c334644d3938c8e5fcdb
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75d1d6841dd90649ea03cbe2ec43c3cfb27bebe8
commit r9-9475-g75d1d6841dd90649ea03cbe2ec43c3cfb27bebe8
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333
Bug ID: 100333
Summary: arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with CMSE nonsecure
call and -march=armv8.1-m.main
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100333
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90773
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:985b3a6837dee7001e6b618f073ed74f0edf5787
commit r12-285-g985b3a6837dee7001e6b618f073ed74f0edf5787
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Jun 10 09:5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50707
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50707&action=edit
prototype
For reference this is the prototype patch I mentioned. I wasn't entirely happy
and wanted to explo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100173
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> > but yes, cselim will also sink the first store, moving it across the
>
> Can we also sink loads?
loads are usually hoisted, not sunk.
> assign pointer to ano
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81778
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-29
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
#include
bool k(int a, int b){
auto c = (a <=> b);
return c>0;
}
Produces
[local count: 1073741824]:
if (a_1(D) == b_3(D))
goto ; [34.00%]
else
goto ; [66.00%]
[local count: 708669
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100334
Bug ID: 100334
Summary: atomic::notify_one() sometimes wakes wrong thread
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100334
--- Comment #1 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
This test assumes previous waiter implementation (I used gcc-11 available from
Ubuntu 21.04), latest atomic_wait impl has the same problem, it is just that
waiter is selected in a different way,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99401
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Maybe dup of PR99872 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100334
--- Comment #2 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
I have adapted the test to gcc trunk, but I am not entirely sure it is correct,
because I don't have gcc trunk locally, I was just testing this on wandbox.org
The problem is even bigger here, be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100334
--- Comment #3 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
If my analysis is correct then:
- we need to force __all = true param in __waiter_pool_base::_M_notify,
- protect from spurious wakeups in __waiter_pool::_M_do_wait by rechecking if
the value h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100312
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd5d57946036c967dae292330fa0aa856a58fb4b
commit r12-290-gfd5d57946036c967dae292330fa0aa856a58fb4b
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Ap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100335
Bug ID: 100335
Summary: Using statement of a ref-qualified method from base
class: method not callable on derived object
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Unfortunately the patch does not work because there aren't suffixes for IFmode
and KFmode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #5 from Steven Munroe ---
Any progress on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100312
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100321
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
C example:
...
/* { dg-additional-options "-foffload=-latomic" } */
#include
struct s
{
int i;
};
#pragma omp declare reduction(+: struct s: omp_out.i += omp_in.i)
int
main (void)
{
const int N0 = 32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña from comment #11)
> Thank you. But the first CE link: https://godbolt.org/z/cPWdGW, and with the
> addition in Comment 2: https://godbolt.org/z/Gezh5h5W4, they still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100321
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
During lower_rec_input_clauses in omp-low.c, the reduction clause is handled:
...
case OMP_CLAUSE_REDUCTION:
case OMP_CLAUSE_IN_REDUCTION:
/* OpenACC reductions are initi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100327
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50708|0 |1
is obsolete|
t/gcc/config/i386/i386-isa.def
/home/dcb/gcc/results.20210429.asan.ubsan/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/plugin/include/config/i386/
$
My best guess is that the "make install" should do this copy.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Writing a phiopt patch now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
Ivan Tubert-Brohman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivan.tubert-brohman@schrodi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100288
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100303
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c97351c0cf4872cc0e99e73ed17fb16659fd38b3
commit r12-292-gc97351c0cf4872cc0e99e73ed17fb16659fd38b3
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100303
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100334
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Rodgers ---
This analysis is likely correct, except for -
"- protect from spurious wakeups in __waiter_pool::_M_do_wait by rechecking if
the value has changed from old, if not then wait again"
An earlier version of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58067
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46250
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.5.0, 6.5.0, 7.5.0
--- Comment #7 from Z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100337
Bug ID: 100337
Summary: Should be able to pass non-present optional arguments
to CO_BROADCAST
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99401
Brecht Sanders changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94102
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f24702258fc78ac37b3e8154d76239cccd30c422
commit r12-294-gf24702258fc78ac37b3e8154d76239cccd30c422
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94102
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50710&action=edit
gcc12-pr94589-wip.patch
WIP patch that just matches those spaceship comparisons followed by single use
compari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68942
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efeca0ac4155b76ce713155f190422aac20537c5
commit r12-295-gefeca0ac4155b76ce713155f190422aac20537c5
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68942
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100331
Michael Benfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mbenfield at google dot com
--- Comm
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
