https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100183
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100183
--- Comment #3 from Ignacio Fernández Galván ---
If it helps, this happens in gcc304 from
https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/, but not in gcc80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100185
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100194
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100183
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Ignacio Fernández Galván from comment #3)
> If it helps, this happens in gcc304 from
> https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/, but not in gcc80
gcc304 is the Apple M1 machine. The GCC supp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100196
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100191
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5668843346c74cabf830e46b45fad24db4566fd6
commit r12-56-g5668843346c74cabf830e46b45fad24db4566fd6
Author: Richard Biener
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100176
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42f2d16e72f925263a27c8ac8231ad31d99517bf
commit r11-8279-g42f2d16e72f925263a27c8ac8231ad31d99517bf
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100198
Bug ID: 100198
Summary: ICE: unexpected expression 'E' of kind
template_parm_index
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100199
Bug ID: 100199
Summary: gfortran.dg/pr68078.f90 FAILs spuriously with ulimit
in place
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100193
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100194
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100195
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100196
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
Bug ID: 100200
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] UB evaluating
aarch64_plus_immediate predicate
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100201
Bug ID: 100201
Summary: Signed integer overflow in poly-int.h
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100192
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100159
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100201
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100201
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Can you please show back-trace (export UBSAN_OPTIONS="print_stacktrace=1")?
I didn't know ubsan did that, thanks! Here is the backtrace:
/home/alecop01/toolchain/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
Backtrace is:
#0 0x4340bc0 in aarch64_plus_immediate(rtx_def*, machine_mode)
/home/alecop01/toolchain/src/gcc/gcc/config/aarch64/predicates.md:129
#1 0x2e0d168 in aarch64_rtx_costs
/home/alecop01/tool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100201
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
Started with r10-3389-g835d50c66aa5bde2f354a6e63a2afa7d2f76a05a for the above
testcase. That commit just introduces a use of aarch64_plus_immediate. The
actual issue must be older.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100201
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 |x86_64-apple-darwin*
Summary|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100202
Bug ID: 100202
Summary: aarch64: UB in insv expander
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
Bug ID: 100203
Summary: Dejagnu timeouts don't work
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100204
Bug ID: 100204
Summary: aarch64: UB evaluating J constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The multiple pids in $pid is a result of standard_close, which does:
if {[board_info ${host} exists fileid_origid]} {
set oid [board_info ${host} fileid_origid]
set pid [pid $
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100175
--- Comment #4 from Miklos Karacsony ---
I've tried to save it but every time I re-run the command it compiles without
an error. This ICE comes randomly, and when it does, I am unable to save the
relevant pre-processed source. I know this is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
Bug ID: 100205
Summary: [11 Regression] error: invalid use of non-static data
member
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems to be a bug in the Bash 'kill' builtin.
#!/bin/bash
# pass /usr/bin/kill as $1 to use the command not the bash builtin
kill=${1:-kill}
sleep 60 &
pid1=$!
sleep 60 &
pid2=$!
sh -c "exec > /de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note that bash documents its behavior:
'kill'
kill [-s SIGSPEC] [-n SIGNUM] [-SIGSPEC] JOBSPEC or PID
kill -l|-L [EXIT_STATUS]
Send a signal specified by SIGSPEC or SIGNUM to the pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Arguably the Bash builtin is behaving as documented. It doesn't mention any
support for process group IDs, and says it returns 0 if at least one signal was
sent, which is true because dejagnu is passing tw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100206
Bug ID: 100206
Summary: aarch64: UB in varasm.c:output_object_block and
assembly failure
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
Yeah, it compiled for me with a build from two weeks ago, too. I should have
mentioned that :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Previoously reported upstream by Richi:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-dejagnu/2018-07/msg0.html
But apparently not actually fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99332
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
FWIW, the testcase starts ICEing with
r11-5171-g1d77928fc49b4f2487fd78db26bbebd00f881414 - I guess it's latent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
--- Comment #3 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
To be more precise my gcc build is:
```
> gcc-git -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/gcc/gcc-git//bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc/gcc-git/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
struct coordinate_matrix {
using index_t = unsigned;
struct convert_to_matrix_coordinate {
index_t column_id;
};
index_t column_id;
// does not work
using value_type2 = decltype(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(I think GCC is correct)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100203
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Richi's patch is in DejaGnu 1.6.2 but Jakub and I are using 1.6.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
Bug ID: 100207
Summary: Error in build()
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
Assignee: dmalc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100205
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> (I think GCC is correct)
clang9 accepts your reduced testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Might very well be
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-dejagnu/2018-07/msg0.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #2 from sujay1844 at protonmail dot com ---
So is the AUR package having a bug??
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100208
Bug ID: 100208
Summary: amdgcn fails to build with llvm-mc from llvm12
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to sujay1844 from comment #2)
> So is the AUR package having a bug??
What's AUR? Can you investigate what sets the -Wformat-security ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100198
--- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> would be nice if you'd hinted on whether you think your testcases are valid
> C++ or not. guessing invalid here
Oops, I should do that, this is a valid code.
https://g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #11)
> I'm just noting that DejaGNU appears to have a bug in the standard_wait
> procedure:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=blob;f=lib/re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99988
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d44d8ed6b4e6fb2d0cf7566214e2e8281dd44cf0
commit r12-58-gd44d8ed6b4e6fb2d0cf7566214e2e8281dd44cf0
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
Bug ID: 100209
Summary: multiple inheritance with crtp pattern fails on
sequentioal member access
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100160
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #25 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
Thanks, I'll just use an older compiler for building Gambit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99564
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100179
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b2db8077136d2f8b5a0db026e6161810be327b3
commit r12-59-g4b2db8077136d2f8b5a0db026e6161810be327b3
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f4588141fcbe4e0f1fa12776b47200870f6c621
commit r12-60-g0f4588141fcbe4e0f1fa12776b47200870f6c621
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a21f3b38c3b9a5c28c79be37b040e7d06d827d76
commit r11-8281-ga21f3b38c3b9a5c28c79be37b040e7d06d827d76
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210
Bug ID: 100210
Summary: [[nodiscard]] constructor causes warning on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Rich
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100160
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> ...
> $ ./install/bin/g++ test-1.cpp -fopenmp -foffload=nvptx-none
> lto-wrapper: fatal error: could not find accel/nvptx-none/mkoffload in
> /home/vries/oacc/tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #0)
> We're seeing OpenACC/nvptx offloading execution regressions (including a lot
> of timeouts) starting with CUDA 11.2-era Nvidia Driver 460.27.04. Confirmed
> wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98072
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |10.4
--- Comment #11 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98187
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98853
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99006
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The __cpp_lib_shared_ptr_arrays feature test macro can be used to detect
whether make_shared works correctly:
#if __cpp_lib_shared_ptr_arrays >= 201707L
https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97971
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100179
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:718fcebe8b65e98b794f9a53ce7358e034657588
commit r11-8282-g718fcebe8b65e98b794f9a53ce7358e034657588
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99216
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34a9bc1f95027eea1560369765b8b2b5722b6779
commit r10-9747-g34a9bc1f95027eea1560369765b8b2b5722b6779
Author: Alex Coplan
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100179
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99542
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> (In reply to sujay1844 from comment #2)
> > So is the AUR package having a bug??
>
> What's AUR? Can you investigate what sets the -Wformat-security ?
Presumabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error in build()|-Werror=format-security
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #6 from sujay1844 at protonmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> Presumably the AUR package of libgccjit is here:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgccjit/
So how do I prevent the AUR package from set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #7 from sujay1844 at protonmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> Presumably the AUR package of libgccjit is here:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgccjit/
So how do I prevent the AUR package from set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #8 from sujay1844 at protonmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> Presumably the AUR package of libgccjit is here:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgccjit/
So how do I prevent the AUR package from set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #9 from sujay1844 at protonmail dot com ---
Oops sorry for sending it thrice. Bugzilla redirected me to some other bug
report, so I clicked back. I thought my comment wasn't submitted, so I sent it
again.
TLDR: i forgot to refresh my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99216
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100208
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs ---
LLVM changed the default parameters, so we either have to change the
expectations in the ".amdgcn_target" string (which is basically an assert), or
set the attributes be want explicitly on the assembler comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98672
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
sujay1844 at protonmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Is that the default /etc/makepkg.conf, or did you hand-edit it? (i.e is this
something that all AUR users are going to run into, or just you?)
Clearly the "-Werror=format-security" is not compatible with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100207
--- Comment #13 from sujay1844 at protonmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #12)
> Is that the default /etc/makepkg.conf, or did you hand-edit it? (i.e is
> this something that all AUR users are going to run into, or just yo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100128
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-22
Status|UNCONFI
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
