https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100142
Bug ID: 100142
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in
linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at
libcpp/line-map.c:1004
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100118
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100024
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100118
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100136
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE, regression, using flag |[11 Regression] ICE,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100142
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Confirmed, started with r11-8150-g4acb3af3669db4ca.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100081
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100142
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/libcpp/line-map.c b/libcpp/line-map.c
index 2f5e7d2..a03d6760a8e 100644
--- a/libcpp/line-map.c
+++ b/libcpp/line-map.c
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset (line_maps *s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100127
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
I think that this issue is already fixed in the released 10.3 branch and in
master (will shortly become GCC11). Please could you try one of those?
$ ./gcc-10/gcc-10/bin/g++ -std=c++20 -fcoroutines pr100127.C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100141
--- Comment #2 from Brecht Sanders
---
My plan was to build entirely without LLVM if possible, but if needed to just
build the offload accelerator I do have it available (though I need to check if
I have this target available).
What options are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100141
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Read the offloading wiki I have referenced?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jignesh from comment #0)
> I am reproducing the comment posted there which gives entire details
> required for bug tracking and resolving. Unfortunately, no developers are
> responding to my m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ede3f69d27e082cbba69b77e9807b06e3ad1730
commit r9-9357-g2ede3f69d27e082cbba69b77e9807b06e3ad1730
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100143
Bug ID: 100143
Summary: gcc/gengtype.c:4097:34: warning: Function
'finish_root_table' argument order different
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07b4b069b34262b77e4295e57351bad49f3c4d06
commit r8-10848-g07b4b069b34262b77e4295e57351bad49f3c4d06
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94080
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100119
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
index dda08ff67f2..5a7a00c13bd 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.c
@@ -1550,6 +1550,8 @@ ix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100144
Bug ID: 100144
Summary: [OpenMP] Data race with "omp parallel master taskloop
... shared(scalar)"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67e95b6908b842e437089e867e5eed6dbbe264f2
commit r10-9715-g67e95b6908b842e437089e867e5eed6dbbe264f2
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #3 from Jignesh ---
Thank you for your responses
glibc version: 2.33.900 (developmental version installed from github) Source:
git clone https://github.com/bminor/glibc.
As far as I understand - I am doing a native build. I first d
LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.1 20210419 (experimental) [master revision
b412ce8e961:756887f4cee:d64720a07f611c55e8c815c775a852d650a2e738] (GCC)
[640] %
[640] % gcctk -O2 -S -o O2.s small.c
[641] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c
[642] %
[642] % wc O2.s O3.s
77 164 1080 O2.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100143
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fde4a87e734f7a889d0cd57d92192e40c91adea2
commit r11-8240-gfde4a87e734f7a889d0cd57d92192e40c91adea2
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3674bfbe7c19fb1e7dfcd0a09dbad9d0e3868d78
commit r9-9358-g3674bfbe7c19fb1e7dfcd0a09dbad9d0e3868d78
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98319
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9736d20a85a20339417e1aafeae4d9a0a73c52ae
commit r9-9359-g9736d20a85a20339417e1aafeae4d9a0a73c52ae
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #4 from Jignesh ---
Again regarding glibc version:
through command ldd -version the output is 2.33.9000 while through following
script it is 2.28:
Script for glibc version:
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98319
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c79725c7b21838e89105381ceff5af05b3609d21
commit r8-10849-gc79725c7b21838e89105381ceff5af05b3609d21
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98319
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #5 from Jignesh ---
I think if I will compile using the new glibc version by pointing to the path
of that glibc - perhaps the problem will be resolved - It seems that the system
is compiling via 2.28 version while this single thread
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
Bug ID: 100146
Summary: __cpp_lib_to_chars not defined
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #6 from Jignesh ---
As per guidance somewhere I will need to change configure script CFLAGS and
some other flag to point to new glibc. Can you please guide what and where I
will have to change to recompile gcc developmental version s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a7ad8ff80dd5bb3ab178588f0ec92aea5251121
commit r9-9360-g9a7ad8ff80dd5bb3ab178588f0ec92aea5251121
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Neither of these projects lives on github.
For glibc documentation see
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/libc.html
sources should be grabbed from
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/sources.html
but in the doc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100147
Bug ID: 100147
Summary: libstdc++-v3/include/bits/gslice.h:170: missing check
for assignment to self ?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f6c858f76983cbc76d447a06ebce43d98a1fcd2
commit r8-10850-g9f6c858f76983cbc76d447a06ebce43d98a1fcd2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 8.5, 9.4 and 10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91057
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
Jignesh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100147
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's obviously safe for self-assignment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92394
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50626
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50626&action=edit
gcc11-pr100146.patch
So do we want something like this patch then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97362
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18e4119b23175e2de2fecdaae052c5a8729d9f56
commit r9-9361-g18e4119b23175e2de2fecdaae052c5a8729d9f56
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97362
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:661dacec8fb149582a2508494ed927ee3387c7f0
commit r8-10851-g661dacec8fb149582a2508494ed927ee3387c7f0
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97362
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100140
--- Comment #10 from Jignesh ---
It was valuable insight for me - connection between gcc and glibc and how new
version of glibc impacts gcc compilation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77711
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Target Milestone|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98985
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100146
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, because std::from_chars still depends on uselocale, and needs to allocate
memory (which can fail, yielding an error code that isn't permitted by the
standard).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97880
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af408874e3d94492ac08ba17462b3ff8ecb4d791
commit r10-9716-gaf408874e3d94492ac08ba17462b3ff8ecb4d791
Author: Tobias Burnus
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98725
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60921
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93151
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80676
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93456
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70692
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93770
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87308
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94749
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68792
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83906
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91371
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81380
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88125
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85828
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70560
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97944
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70472
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95983
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96161
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67791
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|redi at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52389
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo