https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99590
Bug ID: 99590
Summary: ICE when pack expansion with lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|internal compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591
Bug ID: 99591
Summary: Improving __builtin_add_overflow performance on x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99584
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|ICE Segmentatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99587
--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer ---
The problem is that if GCC is not configured for SHF_GNU_RETAIN,
__has_attribute (retain) should not be true.
That is, __has_attribute needs to reflect the actual attribute support status,
and not what happ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99590
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
I think this is a valid code:
void g(auto... args) {
([args...](auto...){}(args ), ...);
}
void f(auto... args) {
([args ](auto...){}(args...), ...);
}
int main() {
g(0, 1); // this one ICE
f(0, 1); //
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99585
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99509
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f20fe2cb213dffba47ec1b62c625590b5bbe50d7
commit r11-7665-gf20fe2cb213dffba47ec1b62c625590b5bbe50d7
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21ced2776a117924e52f6aab8b41afb613fef0e7
commit r11-7666-g21ced2776a117924e52f6aab8b41afb613fef0e7
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Mon M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
Bug ID: 99592
Summary: arm: internal compiler error using arm_neon.h with -pg
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
Bug ID: 99593
Summary: [11 Regression] arm MVE ICE when compiling firefox
(skia) since r11-6708
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> So we now have a "real" FRE after the vectorizer but we fail to CSE
>
> MEM [(double *)&r] = vect__3.20_74;
> ...
> MEM [(double *)&r + 32B] = vect__62.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] arm MVE ICE |[11 Regression] arm Neon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99345
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99587
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer ---
For retain, something along these lines might work:
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
index c1f652d1dc9..cdae464ab8a 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99582
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> ROR can be open-coded, GCC tries hard to detect common patterns.
>
> RCR is difficult because it involves the carry flag and thus the carry
> producer
> would have t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99587
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4)
> For retain, something along these lines might work:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
> index c1f652d1dc9..cdae464ab8a 100644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've tried to reproduce it with
typedef __simd128_int32_t int32x4_t;
void
foo (int32x4_t c)
{
int32x4_t b = __builtin_neon_vdup_nv4si (3);
register int32x4_t a __asm ("d16");
asm volatile ("" : "=w" (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99509
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62bba614ffadb593baaaf13c881874ee96c7b7ce
commit r10-9442-g62bba614ffadb593baaaf13c881874ee96c7b7ce
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99594
Bug ID: 99594
Summary: Parameter packs not expanded in lambda requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98791
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b0bbe19afb2a6800e95f61cc57206e069a400d6
commit r10-9443-g9b0bbe19afb2a6800e95f61cc57206e069a400d6
Author: Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98791
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99595
Bug ID: 99595
Summary: ICE when pack expansion with template lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99596
Bug ID: 99596
Summary: arm: internal error in single_pred_edge
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97252
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 50387
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50387&action=edit
readelf -Wa output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
https://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/go1-mips64el.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99596
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4f86a21263b8e731de68a78862e5c480ef3d160
commit r9-9284-gb4f86a21263b8e731de68a78862e5c480ef3d160
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99597
Bug ID: 99597
Summary: Parameter packs not expanded in lambda template list
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
[43] .debug_line_str MIPS_DWARF ecf07bf 0066e6 01 MS
0 0 1
[44] .debug_line_str MIPS_DWARF ecf6ea5 0005d1 01 MS
0 0 1
Thus, doesn't seem to be dwz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99596
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard ---
On Mon, 2021-03-15 at 12:21 +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> [43] .debug_line_str MIPS_DWARF ecf07bf 0066e6 01
> MS
> 0 0 1
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99482
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99483
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98834
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
So for the missed optimization we run into
/* 5) For aggregate copies translate the reference through them if
the copy kills ref. */
else if (data->vn_walk_kind == VN_WALKREWRITE
...
/* Adju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99488
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure.
One interesting question is whether there are *.o objects with multiple
.debug_line_str sections (but even if there are, shouldn't the linker merge
them?).
So primary suspect here is the linker.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99481
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99528
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexander.lelyakin@googlema
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99481, which changed state.
Bug 99481 Summary: [modules] ICE tree check: expected template_decl, have
function_decl in decl_value, at cp/module.cc:7938
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99481
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99227
Bug 99227 depends on bug 99238, which changed state.
Bug 99238 Summary: [modules] internal compiler error: segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99238
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99482
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99483
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99424
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-03-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99484
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99598
Bug ID: 99598
Summary: Commits are not transferred to bugzilla
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #13 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I confirm that with that patch our code compiles again, however, more or less
all functionality fails because of runtime errors about
Fortran runtime error: Pointer actual argument '' is not associated.
Not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98858
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Bug ID: 99599
Summary: Concepts requirement falsely reporting recursion,
breaks tag_invoke pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99529
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99514
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] internal|[11 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
C test (for -O2 too):
char e[37540];
struct A { int c; } d;
void
bar (int n)
{
__asm__("" : : "r" (e));
}
void
foo (void)
{
__asm__("stw %1, %0" : "=o" (d.c) : "r" (0));
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|Concep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93660
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-March/055816.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from Richa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92782
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #4)
> I have updated the test in the initial description to call intrinsics, added
> relevant dg-* directives. Testing with several configurations under progress.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
Bug ID: 99600
Summary: [11 regression] out of memory for simple test case
(x86 -march=atom)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
--- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann ---
https://godbolt.org/z/z7h7r3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99593
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Before r11-6708 it was using different patterns - ashl3_signed - and
those
don't accept immediate CONST_VECTOR at all, while mve_vshlq_ does.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99599
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99601
Bug ID: 99601
Summary: [11 regression] g++.dg/modules/iostream-1_b.C on
x86_64 with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
Bug ID: 99602
Summary: [11 regression] runtime error: pointer actual argument
not associated
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99603
Bug ID: 99603
Summary: [11 regression] ICE in libstdc++ tests due to module
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99604
Bug ID: 99604
Summary: GC related ICE in
23_containers/vector/modifiers/insert_vs_emplace.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99605
Bug ID: 99605
Summary: [11 regress] new test case
g++.dg/modules/builtin-3_a.C fails for 32 bits
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99602
--- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Created attachment 50389
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50389&action=edit
First (large) reproducer to play with, reducing atm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a14691e924ea4a8277ea36df08b2f5359082bf62
commit r10-9444-ga14691e924ea4a8277ea36df08b2f5359082bf62
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97927
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #13)
> I confirm that with that patch our code compiles again, however, more or
> less all functionality fails because of runtime errors about
> Fortran runtime error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99545
--- Comment #15 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Paul, thanks for the quick response, I opened a new one, PR99602. Please close
this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99606
Bug ID: 99606
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ld.bfd: DWARF error: could not find
abbrev number 64 since r10-7521-g54af95767e887d63
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99606
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99604
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Doesn't reproduce with
make check-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-m32
conformance.exp=insert_vs_emplace.cc"
but appeared in a full (parallel) make check. Running the command in
valgrind do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98834
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:99415d0f18716deeaa8d80e929b1337968cdfa23
commit r11-7671-g99415d0f18716deeaa8d80e929b1337968cdfa23
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98834
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
This patch restores the optimization of _b_c_p on trunk (and hides the issue
again).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99581
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've reproduced it too and started to work on it.
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo