[Bug c++/98432] [coroutine] leaked frame created using await_transform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98432 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Tomáš Hering from comment #5) > Created attachment 50278 [details] > unprocessed original source > > Oops, seems I uploaded a slightly different code. I apologize. It's strange > you can't reprodu

[Bug libstdc++/99333] New: std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99333 Bug ID: 99333 Summary: std::filesystem::path().is_absolute() thinks UNC paths aren't absolute Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/99334] New: Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334 Bug ID: 99334 Summary: Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] bootstrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #38 from Mikael Pettersson --- After updating binutils to ba6eb62ff0ea9843a018cfd7cd06777bd66ae0a0, including the fix for BZ 27268, I was able to do a full bootstrap of current gcc head on Cygwin64. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug c++/99335] New: Comma Operator Evaluation Order - C++ 11 and newer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99335 Bug ID: 99335 Summary: Comma Operator Evaluation Order - C++ 11 and newer Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/49278] ICE (segfault) when combining DATA with default initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278 --- Comment #28 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch for accepts-invalid / ice-on-invalid-code (parameter + data) part: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-March/055768.html

[Bug c/99334] Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug ada/99020] ICE in record containing discriminated accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99020 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/99020] ICE in record containing discriminated accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99020 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3104dbdcf4a2b7766b5570a0fa2d30157082f04e commit r11-7444-g3104dbdcf4a2b7766b5570a0fa2d30157082f04e Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tu

[Bug ada/99020] ICE in record containing discriminated accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99020 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/99095] [10/11 regression] couple of issues with unconstrained array of limited record

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99095 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/99317] Missed warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99317 --- Comment #2 from Piotr --- @(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I dont think this is exactly a bug. The warning is a pedantic warning and > with void*, things are implicitly converted by standard c rules. With not `void *` it is exa

[Bug target/99038] aarch64_rtx_costs is missing tests for vector immediate forms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99038 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/99317] Missed warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99317 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Right. basically what I am saying is: x ? void* : char* implies an implict conversion of the second operand to void*. Without the cast, there is no implict conversion in standard C, that is what the warning i

[Bug c++/99336] New: [modules] ICE combining unordered_map, memory, module partitions

est.cpp with preprocessed source to trigger bug. version: gcc version 11.0.1 20210301 (experimental) target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu build options: -disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc --no-create --no-recursion g++ produces an internal compiler error when combining an unordered_m

[Bug c++/99318] [10/11 Regression] -Wdeprecated-declarations where non-should be?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Keywords|

[Bug c/99323] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in add_hint, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:2234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99323 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 CC|

[Bug c/99324] ICE in mark_addressable, at gimple-expr.c:918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99324 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-02 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/99325] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_print_line_1, at c-family/c-ppoutput.c:454

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99325 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/99326] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99326 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/99334] Generated DWARF unwind table issue while on instructions where rbp is pointing to callers stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99334 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2