[Bug target/99083] Big run-time regressions of 519.lbm_r with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99083 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- This should be a no-op. According to the documentation: --q-- Macro: REG_ALLOC_ORDER If defined, an initializer for a vector of integers, containing the numbers of hard registers in the order in which GCC

[Bug target/96166] [10/11 Regression] -O3/-ftree-slp-vectorize turns ROL into a mess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f3a743b688f4845e1798eed9b2e2284e891da11 commit r11-7233-g0f3a743b688f4845e1798eed9b2e2284e891da11 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug target/96166] [10 Regression] -O3/-ftree-slp-vectorize turns ROL into a mess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] |[10 Regression] |-O3/-

[Bug fortran/67744] [OOP] polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/98897] Erroneous procedure attribute for associate name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Bader at lrz dot de --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/99065] ASSOCIATE function selector expression "no IMPLICIT type" failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99065 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/99027] Incorrect ubound result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99027 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/98996] mips64 ada ftbfs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98996 --- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su --- 96=64+32, so the rtl should be a ldl/ldr + lwl/lwr It should be: (insn 377 376 378 16 (set (reg:SI 499) (unspec:SI [ (mem:BLK (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 216 [ _65 ])

[Bug tree-optimization/93721] swapping adjacent scalars could be more efficient

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93721 Nikita Kniazev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nok.raven at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/99086] New: including and defaulting spaceship operator causes compiler segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99086 Bug ID: 99086 Summary: including and defaulting spaceship operator causes compiler segfault Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/98439] [11 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05402ca65a6696a8f20a3dbcb18f47ba3bdfa268 commit r11-7235-g05402ca65a6696a8f20a3dbcb18f47ba3bdfa268 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sa

[Bug rtl-optimization/98439] [11 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at final.c:3096

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/99087] New: suboptimal codegen for division by constant 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99087 Bug ID: 99087 Summary: suboptimal codegen for division by constant 3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: m

[Bug c++/99088] New: Failure to error on recursive template instantiation in a reasonable time

ler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20210213/configure --prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap --enable-multiarch --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-l

[Bug fortran/99027] Incorrect ubound result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99027 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 --- Comment #60 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4953810bac524e19126a2745c75fed58db962c2 commit r11-7236-ga4953810bac524e19126a2745c75fed58db962c2 Author: Jim Wilson Date: Sat Feb

[Bug target/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 --- Comment #61 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18fabc35f47f0abf4ec14d147098ec4e0734d2a3 commit r11-7237-g18fabc35f47f0abf4ec14d147098ec4e0734d2a3 Author: Levy Hsu Date: Sat Feb 1

[Bug target/97417] RISC-V Unnecessary andi instruction when loading volatile bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99089] New: unnecessary zero extend before AND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99089 Bug ID: 99089 Summary: unnecessary zero extend before AND Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug debug/99090] New: gsplit-dwarf broken on riscv64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090 Bug ID: 99090 Summary: gsplit-dwarf broken on riscv64-linux Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug libfortran/98825] Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/95647] operator(.eq.) and operator(==) treated differently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95647 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/99091] New: constexpr variable evaluated at runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99091 Bug ID: 99091 Summary: constexpr variable evaluated at runtime Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [8/9/10/11 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|10.0|10.2.0, 11.0 --- Comment #7 from Martin S

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [8/9/10/11 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/99092] New: Using -O3 and -fprefetch-loop-arrays to compile BLAS on Apple M1 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99092 Bug ID: 99092 Summary: Using -O3 and -fprefetch-loop-arrays to compile BLAS on Apple M1 fails Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/90663] [8/9 Regression] strcmp (&a[i], a + i) not folded for arrays and constant index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90663 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|10.0|10.2.0, 11.0 --- Comment #4 from Martin S

[Bug tree-optimization/92539] [8/9/10/11 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with -O3 (loop unroll?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92539 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- >From the vrp1 dump it seems that it should be possible to determine that bb 8 and later are unreachable. Might the predicate analysis help here as well? int main () { const char * last; int i; const c

[Bug middle-end/96900] [9/10/11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on strlen with valid pointer obtained from just-past-the-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96900 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-14 Blocks|

[Bug c/89807] Incorrect -Wconversion warning when shifting uint32_t with 24

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89807 --- Comment #1 from Hannes Domani --- (In reply to Nickolay Kolchin-Semyonov from comment #0) > uint8_t a = (v >> 24) & 0xFF; // ERROR: produces warning > uint8_t a2 = v >> 24; // ERROR: produces warning I think the '& 0xFF' part is opti

[Bug ada/98996] mips64 ada ftbfs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98996 --- Comment #2 from YunQiang Su --- Created attachment 50180 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50180&action=edit it generates subreg instead of reg

[Bug c++/99093] New: [missed optimization] Missed devirtualization involving internal-linkage class type (but only sometimes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99093 Bug ID: 99093 Summary: [missed optimization] Missed devirtualization involving internal-linkage class type (but only sometimes) Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug fortran/98686] Namelist group objects shall be defined before appearing in namelist for -std=f2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99094] New: [AIX] Thread local uninitialized data allocated in .comm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094 Bug ID: 99094 Summary: [AIX] Thread local uninitialized data allocated in .comm Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/99094] [AIX] Thread local uninitialized data allocated in .comm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99094 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/98686] Namelist group objects shall be defined before appearing in namelist for -std=f2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- I am changing the word 'defined' to 'declared'.