[Bug fortran/99010] [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2322 since r11-7054-ge3f9f80bfa9e58a9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99010 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/99006] make_shared silently works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99006 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/99006] make_shared silently works

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99006 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/2020-October/139506.html

[Bug c++/99019] New: A nicer error hint, for cpp modules, if missing headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99019 Bug ID: 99019 Summary: A nicer error hint, for cpp modules, if missing headers Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug lto/98971] LTO removes __patchable_function_entries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98971 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/99003] memory leak in IPA ICF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99003 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/99017] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_bb_vectorization_profitable_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99017 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:283653f45595f53db486cbc2f1f10091cb45ea3b commit r11-7144-g283653f45595f53db486cbc2f1f10091cb45ea3b Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug ada/99020] New: ICE in record containing discriminated accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99020 Bug ID: 99020 Summary: ICE in record containing discriminated accesses Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ad

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7) > I think libsanitizer falls back to a version-less lookup if the version > cannot be found. Therefore, if the glibc baseline is after 2.3.4, the > version-less lo

[Bug rtl-optimization/98692] Unitialized Values reported only with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98692 --- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard --- OK, so according to memcheck the load uses a pointer value that isn't initialized properly. And it thinks that value originated from a stack value in the isVariable call. Unfortunately my powerpc assembly is

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 50149 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50149&action=edit Patch v2 There's a second version of the patch that selectively define SANITIZER_REGEXEC_VERSION based on the t

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #39 from niek --- I just tested this on the nightly build of GCC 11. Unfortunately, the issue is still there... @Richard Biener Would it be a good idea to attach this bug's target milestone to GCC 11.1? (instead of, or in addition to

[Bug sanitizer/95137] Sanitizers seem to be missing support for coroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137 --- Comment #40 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to niek from comment #39) > I just tested this on the nightly build of GCC 11. Unfortunately, the issue > is still there... > > @Richard Biener > Would it be a good idea to attach this bug's target

[Bug rtl-optimization/98692] Unitialized Values reported only with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98692 --- Comment #13 from Mark Wielaard --- I could replicate this with gcc 9.1.1 with the following source: #define variables (const char* []){ "PK", "KEK", "db"} int ret, len; void isVariable(char *var) { for (int v = 0; v < 2; v++) if (__

[Bug tree-optimization/99017] ICE: Segmentation fault (in vect_bb_vectorization_profitable_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99017 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- LGTM. But as I said, it could be useful to look for other symbols too. Looking at i686 glibc, I see for j in /lib/libc.so.6 /lib/libpthread.so.0 /lib/libm.so.6; do for i in `readelf -Ws $j | grep -v ' UND '

[Bug libstdc++/99021] New: coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99021 Bug ID: 99021 Summary: coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/99021] coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99021 --- Comment #1 from Mathias Stearn --- clang bug for reference https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49109

[Bug middle-end/99004] memory leak in maybe_warn_rdwr_sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99004 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5304598f1481886f9871cc024cb65ba34aa4be3 commit r11-7145-ge5304598f1481886f9871cc024cb65ba34aa4be3 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tu

[Bug middle-end/98465] [11 Regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overread with -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465 --- Comment #30 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e14ea108faa6eba6a60a45ff0ca3099ce6ae45c2 commit r11-7146-ge14ea108faa6eba6a60a45ff0ca3099ce6ae45c2 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug middle-end/99004] memory leak in maybe_warn_rdwr_sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99004 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/98465] Bogus -Wstringop-overread with -std=gnu++20 -O2 and std::string::insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] Bogus |Bogus -Wstringop-overread

[Bug sanitizer/98920] [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- On x86_64 these are intercepted from the list you provided: sched_getaffinity clock_getcpuclockid lgammal clock_settime clock_gettime memcpy fmemopen realpath lgamma lgammaf glob glob64 pthread_attr_getaffin

[Bug rtl-optimization/98863] [11 Regression] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863 --- Comment #44 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:396cc31317ebad416e234dfa5f85d42585d32437 commit r11-7147-g396cc31317ebad416e234dfa5f85d42585d32437 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/99019] A nicer error hint, for cpp modules, if missing headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99019 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug libstdc++/99021] coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99021 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26a3f288f1895a8c061c0458590542a3d2ee796a commit r11-7149-g26a3f288f1895a8c061c0458590542a3d2ee796a Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/99013] std::source_location::function_name should return same result in constexpr mode and non-constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99013 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/98863] [11 Regression] WRF with LTO consumes a lot of memory in REE, FWPROP and x86 specific passes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863 --- Comment #45 from Richard Biener --- perf profile from non-bootstrapped, release checking enabled lto1 for ltrans34 on a 3900X (so plenty of L3): Samples: 1M of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 1572289976832 Overhead

[Bug c/99022] New: When ‘long int’ is 32 bits，the conversion between 'vector(2) int' and 'vector(2) long int' can't be done without 'flax-vector-conversions'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99022 Bug ID: 99022 Summary: When ‘long int’ is 32 bits，the conversion between 'vector(2) int' and 'vector(2) long int' can't be done without 'flax-vector-conversions'. Product: g

[Bug target/98931] [11 Regression] arm: Assembly fails with "branch out of range or not a multiple of 2" since r11-2012

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931 --- Comment #13 from akrl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted here:

[Bug libstdc++/99021] coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99021 --- Comment #3 from Mathias Stearn --- Thanks for the quick fix! Any chance of a backport of this and https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/f1b6e46c417224887c2f21baa6d4c538a25fe9fb#diff-ed08df78eba81189642b4e8d670a0adb4b377db6846aecb090b4dce5

[Bug c++/98944] [modules] Failed to read compiled module with a non-exported partition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98944 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99023] New: [modules] ICE/SIGSEGV in module_state::write_define

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99023 Bug ID: 99023 Summary: [modules] ICE/SIGSEGV in module_state::write_define Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c/99022] When ‘long int’ is 32 bits，the conversion between 'vector(2) int' and 'vector(2) long int' can't be done without 'flax-vector-conversions'.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99022 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv Version|unknown

[Bug c++/99013] std::source_location::function_name should return same result in constexpr mode and non-constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99013 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- And --- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c.jj 2021-02-09 10:05:28.835833433 +0100 +++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c2021-02-09 15:02:37.906710438 +0100 @@ -3030,6 +3030,7 @@ fold_builtin_source_location (location_t

[Bug libstdc++/99021] coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99021 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa183497cf25b604f5b76bc16766f30f5ec7e05b commit r10-9353-gfa183497cf25b604f5b76bc16766f30f5ec7e05b Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug c++/99000] [modules] declaration std::__copy_move_a2 conflicts with import

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99000 --- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov --- Thanks for pointing this out. Am I correct in interpreting the SUSPENDED status as unlikely to be fixed for GCC 11?

[Bug tree-optimization/99024] New: memory leak in vect_analyze_loop_form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99024 Bug ID: 99024 Summary: memory leak in vect_analyze_loop_form Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug c++/98994] [11 Regression] Empty type with [[no_unique_address]] in union with constructor is not a constant expression since r11-6918

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98994 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99024] memory leak in vect_analyze_loop_form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99024 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/99025] New: [11 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r11-6351-g12ae2bc70846a2be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99025 Bug ID: 99025 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r11-6351-g12ae2bc70846a2be Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-v

[Bug target/99025] [11 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r11-6351-g12ae2bc70846a2be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99025 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Priority|P3

[Bug preprocessor/96391] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in linemap_compare_locations, at libcpp/line-map.c:1359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391 --- Comment #11 from David Malcolm --- FWIW I had another go at reproduing this, but after various failures due to running out of disk space, I was able to rebuild the SRPM from comment #0 without seeing the crash, via: mock --rebuild mingw-wi

[Bug libstdc++/99021] coroutine_handle<_Promise>::from_address() should be noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99021 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/98950] jump threading memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98950 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- I'm reducing 150kB big .i file, one compiler execution in valgrind takes ~25s.

[Bug libstdc++/98985] libstdc++: filesystem::rename not overwriting files on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98985 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99007] [11 Regression] ICE in dominated_by_p, at dominance.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99007 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Simplified testcase, no need for templates, and no need for UB in the code and no need for C++: void bar (int n) { long s[n]; #pragma omp teams distribute parallel for reduction(+:s) allocate(s) for (in

[Bug tree-optimization/99026] New: memleak in switch-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99026 Bug ID: 99026 Summary: memleak in switch-conversion Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/99007] [11 Regression] ICE in dominated_by_p, at dominance.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99007 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- And allocate clause isn't needed either, this ICEs since r9-3941-g28567c40e2c7c88e424283e8a1a6ff8cb7ba440c when host teams has been introduced: int bar (int n) { int s[n]; int i, j; for (i = 0; i < n; i

[Bug fortran/99027] New: Incorrect ubound result

.1-2) But I also build current HEAD from git (26a3f288f18) and am still seeing this issue: GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.0 20210209 (experimental) Interestingly, if I change the test program to: program test integer, dimension (1:3,1:6) :: array print *, "ubound = ", ubound (arr

[Bug analyzer/99028] New: diagnostic path is too verbose

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99028 Bug ID: 99028 Summary: diagnostic path is too verbose Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug tree-optimization/98950] jump threading memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98950 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/98944] [modules] Failed to read compiled module with a non-exported partition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98944 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92941cea2f05a8cf79fc71aa39fa948dcfb82d7a commit r11-7150-g92941cea2f05a8cf79fc71aa39fa948dcfb82d7a Author: Nathan Sidwell Date:

[Bug c++/98944] [modules] Failed to read compiled module with a non-exported partition.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98944 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/99029] New: memory leak in IPA pure-const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99029 Bug ID: 99029 Summary: memory leak in IPA pure-const Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/99007] [11 Regression] ICE in dominated_by_p, at dominance.c:1124

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99007 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50152 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50152&action=edit gcc11-pr99007.patch Untested fix.

[Bug analyzer/99028] diagnostic path is too verbose

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99028 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/98882] [11 Regression] ICE in in cpp_directive_only_process on empty translation unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98882 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Please file that as a different PR. And that is something for Nathan to look at, I don't know anything about that.

[Bug analyzer/99028] diagnostic path is too verbose

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99028 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- At -fanalyzer-verbosity=1 and below, we only show those two events: In function ‘add_to_trie’: ../../src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/pr99028.c:175:28: warning: dereference of possibly-NULL ‘child’ [CWE-690

[Bug target/98998] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98998] [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2275 since r11-3427

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/98950] jump threading memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98950 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Also hapens as ==15400== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==15400== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==15400== Using Valgrind-3.15.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright i

[Bug c++/99030] New: [11 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99030 Bug ID: 99030 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:776 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99031] New: Comparing pointers to heap-allocated memory is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99031 Bug ID: 99031 Summary: Comparing pointers to heap-allocated memory is not a constant expression Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99032] New: GCC accepts attributes on friend declarations (not definitions)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99032 Bug ID: 99032 Summary: GCC accepts attributes on friend declarations (not definitions) Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99033] New: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033 Bug ID: 99033 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/99033] [11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Keywords|

[Bug c++/99034] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in emit_to_new_bb_before, at except.c:932

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99034 Bug ID: 99034 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in emit_to_new_bb_before, at except.c:932 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/99035] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in declare_weak, at varasm.c:5930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99035 Bug ID: 99035 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in declare_weak, at varasm.c:5930 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/99036] New: [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_current_interface_head, at fortran/interface.c:4699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036 Bug ID: 99036 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gfc_current_interface_head, at fortran/interface.c:4699 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c++/99032] GCC accepts attributes on friend declarations (not definitions)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99032 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-09 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/99030] [11 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/99037] New: Invalid representation of vector zero in aarch64-simd.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99037 Bug ID: 99037 Summary: Invalid representation of vector zero in aarch64-simd.md Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/99037] Invalid representation of vector zero in aarch64-simd.md

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99037 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99033] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_int64, at tree.c:3091

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug ipa/99034] [10/11 Regression] ICE in emit_to_new_bb_before, at except.c:932

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99034 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|c++

[Bug target/99038] New: aarch64_rtx_costs is missing tests for vector immediate forms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99038 Bug ID: 99038 Summary: aarch64_rtx_costs is missing tests for vector immediate forms Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/99035] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in declare_weak, at varasm.c:5930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99035 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-09 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/99035] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in declare_weak, at varasm.c:5930

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99035 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/99039] New: cross-module using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99039 Bug ID: 99039 Summary: cross-module using declarations Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug c++/99030] [11 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99039] cross-module using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99039 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99040] New: [modules] partitions & using declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99040 Bug ID: 99040 Summary: [modules] partitions & using declarations Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/88197] ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6381

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88197 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- Actually, this looks like a combine issue. Before combine, we have: (insn 124 123 125 3 (set (reg:V2DF 198 [ MEM [(void *)_75] ]) (mem:V2DF (reg:DI 149 [ ivtmp.49 ]) [0 MEM [(void *)_75]+0 S16 A8]

[Bug target/88197] ICE in decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:6381

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88197 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3) > Actually, this looks like a combine issue. Before combine, we have: Bah, wrong bug. Sorry!

[Bug rtl-optimization/99041] New: combine creates invalid address which ICEs in decompose_normal_address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041 Bug ID: 99041 Summary: combine creates invalid address which ICEs in decompose_normal_address Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/99025] [11 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r11-6351-g12ae2bc70846a2be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/99041] combine creates invalid address which ICEs in decompose_normal_address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug analyzer/99042] New: file-leak is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99042 Bug ID: 99042 Summary: file-leak is wrong Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer Assignee: dm

[Bug rtl-optimization/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 --- Comment #41 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20f28986a8d3cad3c848d1e7da48f4bea7637298 commit r11-7154-g20f28986a8d3cad3c848d1e7da48f4bea7637298 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: T

[Bug rtl-optimization/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 --- Comment #42 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1d2ed3ad54378e8798dab27c841418f3f60cff2 commit r10-9354-gb1d2ed3ad54378e8798dab27c841418f3f60cff2 Author: Eric Botcazou

[Bug rtl-optimization/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/99041] combine creates invalid address which ICEs in decompose_normal_address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/99043] New: Inconsistent behavior when calling rank(ptr) for assumed-rank null pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99043 Bug ID: 99043 Summary: Inconsistent behavior when calling rank(ptr) for assumed-rank null pointer Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug rtl-optimization/99041] combine creates invalid address which ICEs in decompose_normal_address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Combiner tries to combine whatever it can and if it matches (and costs > suggest it is beneficial) it keeps it. > So, this looks like a target bug to me. > In par

[Bug tree-optimization/99002] [11 Regression] memory leak in if-to-switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99002 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Another one: ==17557== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==17557== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==17557== Using Valgrind-3.15.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright inf

[Bug analyzer/99044] New: use-after-free false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99044 Bug ID: 99044 Summary: use-after-free false positive Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer A

[Bug c++/95888] [9/10/11 Regression] Regression in 9.3. GCC freezes when compiling code using boost::poly_collection::segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- I've found out that the same issue happens with auto template parameter too, and started way before my change: template class A { A(int, int); template friend class A; friend T; }; template struct B

[Bug target/98729] [11 Regression] GCC 11 MinGW Windows build doesn't generate working PE executables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98729 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #8) > Also, my win64 build uses SEH, not dwarf, DWARF is still used for debug info even if you don't use it for EH.

[Bug rtl-optimization/96015] [10/11 Regression] gcc-10.1.0 miscompiles Python on hppa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015 --- Comment #44 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2021-02-09 2:01 p.m., ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > This should be fixed on the 10 branch. Thank you Eric 😁

  1   2   >