https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98906
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98908
Bug ID: 98908
Summary: Failure to optimize arithmetic involving struct
members into operating on the entire struct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98906
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov ---
Ah, -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow catches it, but it needs to be enabled
explicitly (not implied by -fsanitize=undefined). Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:972918eea873f8b1663151316c4b3aee7ae028e2
commit r11-7005-g972918eea873f8b1663151316c4b3aee7ae028e2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
> How do you reduce a gcda file together with the original source?
I did it in 2 steps. I first reduced the source file and then I wrote an
experimental binary reducer that removes GCDA function entries.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98909
Bug ID: 98909
Summary: Failure to optimize odd loop pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98909
--- Comment #1 from Gabriel Ravier ---
PS: The same pattern with `unsigned` replacing `int` can be optimized to
`return x & 1;` (done by LLVM, but not by GCC).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98791
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
Here is a non-LTO testcase that fails with -O -ftree-vectorize
-march=armv8.2-a+sve --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=3:
extern char a[], b[];
short c, d;
long *e;
void f() {
for (int g; g < c; g += 1) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Another test case. I compiled source code file dcabs1.f, from the lapack
package.
I got
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20210131.valgrind/bin/gfortran dcabs1.f
==76833== Conditional jump or move depends on uninit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98910
Bug ID: 98910
Summary: [11 regression] locale_t undefined on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98848
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So what about punting if the lhs of the possible over_widen pattern is a PHI on
loop header?
--- gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c.jj 2021-01-04 10:25:38.650235896 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c2021-02-01 10:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911
Bug ID: 98911
Summary: Add folding and remove expanders for x86 *pcmp{et,gt}*
builtins
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> Another test case. I compiled source code file dcabs1.f, from the lapack
> package.
>
> I got
>
> $ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20210131.valgrind/bin/gfortran dcabs1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98833
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98911
Bug 98911 depends on bug 98833, which changed state.
Bug 98833 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since
r11-6849-gee78c20e74d30284
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98833
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50088|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98848
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98848
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> So what about punting if the lhs of the possi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96307
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:037a02be13d24f3be65480b50c58c7f6cf654f9a
commit r10-9329-g037a02be13d24f3be65480b50c58c7f6cf654f9a
Author: Kito Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98848
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 50103
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50103&action=edit
fortran source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98904
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Can you please point to the source file.
./BLAS/SRC/dcabs1.f
I have attached a copy anyway.
> And can you please use the following valgrind option:
> --expens
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50087|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912
Bug ID: 98912
Summary: valgrind error in default_elf_asm_output_ascii
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-01
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98913
Bug ID: 98913
Summary: Create-temporary difference coarray/noncoarray –
invalid code due to missing temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98914
Bug ID: 98914
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in rs6000_expand_vector_set, at
config/rs6000/rs6000.c:7198
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98590
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Kludge to work around configure breakage. Not pretty, but at least it lets
> bootstrap w/ Ada succeed on Cygwin.
OK, let's go for this. Can you post it on the gcc-patches@ mailing list?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91128
--- Comment #3 from Shadow HUANG ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> How did you create the 'input' binary?
I use my fuzzer to create it. It is a new hybrid fuzzing techniques.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98915
Bug ID: 98915
Summary: OpenACC routine with a name directive does not compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98916
Bug ID: 98916
Summary: stack overflow in cxxfilt, str_buf_reserve,
rust-demangle.c:1432
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98913
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> D.3991 = (*(real(kind=8)[0:] * restrict) bb.data)[(bb.offset +
> (integer(kind=8)) j * bb.dim[1].stride) + (integer(kind=8)) k];
Missed that this one is a FP num
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98915
--- Comment #1 from Kiril Dichev ---
See attached file for reference, snippet in description is not quite correct as
I was trying to be brief
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Summary|WRF with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98913
Jorge D'Elia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jde...@santafe-conicet.gov.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #35 from Richard Biener ---
So on the gcc-10 branch with 4311ae206da1, 5ea7be5068f17, 99c96e797d9662c8,
99dafea9bfebb and 327ec3ea29b58 cherry-picked we top out at 2.5GB and
RTL forwprop is not measuably increasing RSS footage.
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98531
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
I've now managed to test your v2 patch, with mixed results:
* On Solaris 11.4:
the libstdc++ failures are gone
the new tests PASS
however, the old g++.dg/modules tests continue to ICE as before
* On So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98287
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50108&action=edit
gcc11-pr98287.patch
I'd be afraid it could be hundreds of patterns potentially affected by this.
So I think it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|WRF with LTO co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38319
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #11)
> Related / same issue:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-January/055654.html
Hi Tobias,
Over the weekend, I had a stab at fixing this recent issue. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98088
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917
Bug ID: 98917
Summary: SVE: wrong code with -O -ftree-vectorize
-msve-vector-bits=128
--param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98899
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97971
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50110
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50110&action=edit
gcc11-pr97971.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If the patch tests cleanly we should apply it to GCC 9 and 8 too (if
applicable)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98863
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4311ae206da13a9bfdb4245feb400dbee0f528a0
commit r10-9330-g4311ae206da13a9bfdb4245feb400dbee0f528a0
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'm backporting stuff to older branches in batches and don't plan to do it for
9 or 8 in the near future. If anyone beats me with the backports, I certainly
won't mind.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96282
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f426e4f63451e937c943606d3142b1ac6b70467a
commit r10-9331-gf426e4f63451e937c943606d3142b1ac6b70467a
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84494
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84494
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b303ef6cc8a5913345cbcd91abf13075ab2aec9
commit r11-7007-g1b303ef6cc8a5913345cbcd91abf13075ab2aec9
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84494
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Got it stuck again over the weekend:
kojibui+ 9992 101 0.1 884512 29120 ?Sl Jan31 968:04
\_
+/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-11.0.0-20210130/ob
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88115
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98915
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98917
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #1)
> Is this a 11 regression?
It's hard to tell given the dependency on --param=aarch64-autovec-preference=2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
It's fixed on master, can we close it now or do we need a backport to active
branches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8
commit r11-7011-g6e0a231a4aa2407bb7167daf98a37795a67364d8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98912
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
For varasm.c line 8285 is
for (p = s; p < limit && *p != '\0'; p++)
So either the limit is wrong or there are some un-init bytes in
the string. My money is on option 2 ;->
Maybe a suitable firs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918
Bug ID: 98918
Summary: Analyzer false positives due to sm-state involving
UNKNOWN pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98884
--- Comment #5 from David Brown ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Note, for ABI compatibility or incompatibility it might be better to check
> what happens when some argument is passed after the empty structs. Because
> at least
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab669f2fc643cb1673aecd177eec1c773e9e48e
commit r11-7012-gbab669f2fc643cb1673aecd177eec1c773e9e48e
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c616e86e8bc76f867242b4aba372736d1c8cbf80
commit r10-9332-gc616e86e8bc76f867242b4aba372736d1c8cbf80
Author: Marek Polacek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98918
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Analyzer false positives|[11 Regression] Analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e534fb7d8256a605b6bdc12451d209af1bed329
commit r11-7013-g7e534fb7d8256a605b6bdc12451d209af1bed329
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98884
--- Comment #6 from David Brown ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> If GCC and Clang are ABI incompatible on this, then one of the two compilers
> is buggy. So, it is needed to look at the EABI and find out which case it
> is.
I'v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98835
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2f8e378d64f65645e5f9c41a8221ca102c71208
commit r11-7014-gc2f8e378d64f65645e5f9c41a8221ca102c71208
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98504
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
a trunk 20210130 build without LTO did succeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> C++20 adds these typedefs.
And the __cpp_lib_atomic_lock_free_type_aliases feature test macro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0718336a5284dd5b40fd6691a94d6be93a80f279
commit r11-7018-g0718336a5284dd5b40fd6691a94d6be93a80f279
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98919
Bug ID: 98919
Summary: auto declaration of multiple variables allows
inconsistent types
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98884
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
x86-64 is handled correctly according to the psABI, see
https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/-/blob/master/x86-64-ABI/low-level-sys-info.tex
The empty classes will end up with NO_CLASS and thus aren't pas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98920
Bug ID: 98920
Summary: [10/11 Regression] uses regexec without support for
REG_STARTEND with -fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Indeed, r11-5904-g4cf70c20cb10acd6fb1016611d05540728176b60 fixed it. I'll add
the testcase into the testsuite after testing it.
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc64-*-*
$ /daten/gcc/gcc-20210201/Build/./gcc/gdc
-B/daten/gcc/gcc-20210201/Build/./gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc64-suse-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98922
Bug ID: 98922
Summary: -fstack-usage not working with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98921
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98724
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98729
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98923
Bug ID: 98923
Summary: [11 regression] bootstrap on powerpc64 fails after
r11-6995
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98923
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
