[Bug fortran/98858] New: OpenMP offload target data ICE at use_device_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98858 Bug ID: 98858 Summary: OpenMP offload target data ICE at use_device_ptr Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug fortran/98858] OpenMP offload target data ICE at use_device_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98858 --- Comment #1 from Ye Luo --- GNU Fortran (GCC) 11.0.0 20210127 (experimental)

[Bug tree-optimization/60770] disappearing clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 --- Comment #15 from Orgad Shaneh --- test.cpp: In function ‘int f(int)’: test.cpp:7:11: warning: ‘q’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] 7 | return *p; | ^ Is this the intended description? It doesn't

[Bug c++/98295] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:4312

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/98853] [9/10/11 Regression] wrong use of bfxil at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98853 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:55163419211c6f17e3e22c68304384eba35782a3 commit r11-6941-g55163419211c6f17e3e22c68304384eba35782a3 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug target/98853] [9/10 Regression] wrong use of bfxil at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98853 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-27 Summary|[9/10/11 R

[Bug c++/97874] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_using_decl, at cp/name-lookup.c:4652

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cd7c32549fa334885b716fe98b674f6447fa7c0 commit r11-6942-g9cd7c32549fa334885b716fe98b674f6447fa7c0 Author: Jason Merrill Date: We

[Bug c++/97874] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have template_type_parm in lookup_using_decl, at cp/name-lookup.c:4652

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Status|ASS

[Bug lto/85574] [8/9 Regression] LTO bootstapped binaries differ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85574 --- Comment #38 from Eric Botcazou --- > Feel free to improve things - I do not have any Windows system to > test on or an idea what you think needs to be improved. I would > guess similar things apply to compare-debug which it was derived from.

[Bug c++/98570] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98859] New: pedantic error on use of __VA_OPT__ before C++20 is unnecessary and counterproductive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98859 Bug ID: 98859 Summary: pedantic error on use of __VA_OPT__ before C++20 is unnecessary and counterproductive Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/98859] pedantic error on use of __VA_OPT__ before C++20 is unnecessary and counterproductive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever con

[Bug libstdc++/70303] Value-initialized debug iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70303 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org A

[Bug rtl-optimization/97684] [11 Regression] ICE in reg_preferred_class, at reginfo.c:789 by r11-4577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081c96621da658760b4a67c07530805f770fa22c commit r11-6943-g081c96621da658760b4a67c07530805f770fa22c Author: Vladimir N. Makarov D

[Bug fortran/86470] [8/9/10/11 Regression] [OOP] ICE with OMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86470 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug rtl-optimization/80960] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Huge memory use when compiling a very large test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960 --- Comment #26 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23) > (that combine number prevails on trunk as well, I can't spot any code > that disables combine on large BBs so not sure what goes on here) There is no suc

[Bug bootstrap/98860] New: boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Bug ID: 98860 Summary: boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c/97172] [11 Regression] ICE: tree code ‘ssa_name’ is not supported in LTO streams since r11-3303-g6450f07388f9fe57

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172 --- Comment #25 from Martin Sebor --- Patch v3: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564411.html

[Bug ipa/98594] [11 Regression] IPA modref codegen bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98594 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- The initialization is removed by dse1 pass. We get: ipa-modref: call stmt D.3199 = bitCount::bitCount_bitfield<1, int, glm::packed_highp> (&D.3185); [return slot optimization] ipa-modref: call to glm::vec bitC

[Bug bootstrap/98860] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- The question is that why it says we are not cross-compiling? I am using the same script I used before. https://bitbucket.org/ejsvifq_mabmip/mingw-gcc-mcf-gthread/src/master/PKGBUILD It is so weird. checking whe

[Bug bootstrap/98860] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- I guess is because of this commit https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/0411ae7f08e0f5a8b02ff313d26d27a0f6d1bb34 https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=0411ae7f08e0f5a8b02ff313d26d27a0f6d1bb34

[Bug c++/98861] New: I want deterministic exceptions (Herbception)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98861 Bug ID: 98861 Summary: I want deterministic exceptions (Herbception) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/98860] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- After revert to the previous commit. Compilation success https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/bfab355012ca0f5219da8beb04f2fdaf757d34b7 I think it has to do with the script you changed, Jakub.

[Bug bootstrap/98860] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 50071 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50071&action=edit bootstrap failure picture

[Bug bootstrap/98860] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- I do not know whether it has to do with the CRLF issue because GCC on Linux emits the same result as it does on MinGW-w64 or msys2. conftextx.c #ifdef __x86_64__ #ifndef __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4 #error

[Bug c++/98862] New: Complex reduction support in offload region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98862 Bug ID: 98862 Summary: Complex reduction support in offload region Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/98827] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-builtin-7.c assembler counts off after r11-6857

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98827 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe37371cf372b84d5b7f1a6f5f0971a513dd5fa commit r11-6947-gfbe37371cf372b84d5b7f1a6f5f0971a513dd5fa Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Wed J

[Bug target/98799] [11 Regression] vector_set_var ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbe37371cf372b84d5b7f1a6f5f0971a513dd5fa commit r11-6947-gfbe37371cf372b84d5b7f1a6f5f0971a513dd5fa Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Wed J

[Bug fortran/93524] [ISO C Binding][F2018] CFI_allocate – elem_size mishandled + sm wrongly set?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93524 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug bootstrap/98860] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- configure:4069: ./conftest.exe /home/unlvs/mcf_build/src/gcc-git/libgomp/configure: line 4071: ./conftest.exe: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error configure:4073: $? = 126 configure:4080: error: in `/hom

[Bug bootstrap/98860] [11 Regression] boostrap failure on MinGW-w64 windows 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|boostrap failure on |[11 Regression] boostrap

[Bug c++/98861] I want deterministic exceptions (Herbception)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98861 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/98856] [11 Regression] botan AES-128/XTS is slower by ~17% since r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98856 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The cxx bench Botan doesn't know --cxxflags, what Botan version are you looking at?

[Bug ipa/98594] [11 Regression] IPA modref codegen bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98594 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98594 > > --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- > The initialization is removed by dse1 pass.

<    1   2