https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98668
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98662
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94212
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
So I'm not sure this is actually a bug - the vectorizer in-order reduction
vectorization changes the FMA groups we can form (but they are not required by
the standard since they are not explicit fma () calls
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Keywords|alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-14
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94918
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94978
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[9/10/11 Regressi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95276
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.1.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98670
Bug ID: 98670
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.c:3091 since r11-6628-gb668a06e37f72fd9
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98670
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94918
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> What's the status on this?
An updated patch was posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563142.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #37 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96458
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96431
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-14
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98671
Bug ID: 98671
Summary: gcc/config/i386/i386-options.c:787:redundantAssignment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98672
Bug ID: 98672
Summary: constexpr function - for loop with return statement
doesn't get recognized as constexpr subexpression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96485
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96963
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96966
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97296
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95549
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> Is this still a problem?
It was when I last tried in December (cf. PR ada/98171, last two lines).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97487
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
The failures reported in Comment 11 still exist on master, though.
Maybe it's too early to remove 11 from the regression list?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #43 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97510
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #44 from Martin Liška ---
I can confirm that s390x target is fine now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98673
Bug ID: 98673
Summary: pass fre4 inhibit pass dom3 to create much more
optimized code
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98669
--- Comment #2 from Marko Mäkelä ---
I cannot reproduce this with Debian's gcc-9 package on my system:
Architecture: amd64
Version: 9.3.0-20
gcc-9 -fsanitize=address crypt.c -lcrypt && ./a.out
sasWQy9ecMDEs
If I change the invocation to gcc or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97680
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
maybe do a dg-skip-if .. { target ! { positive list } }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97703
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
bisection? why is it a regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 regression] Bogus |Bogus warnings about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97874
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97966
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97971
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #45 from Matthias Klose ---
I think this one can be closed. There's still PR98228 for s390x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97972
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98670
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49963&action=edit
gcc11-pr98670.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97984
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97995
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo