https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98577
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98611
Bug ID: 98611
Summary: [concepts] internal compiler error: in
get_underlying_template, at cp/pt.c:6494
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On January 9, 2021 4:17:17 AM GMT+01:00, "jiangning.liu at amperecomputing dot
com" wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
>
>--- Comment #5 from Jiangning Liu com> ---
>> It h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98603
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16dae48e9cd0421106517fc657c8743a14468945
commit r11-6562-g16dae48e9cd0421106517fc657c8743a14468945
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98556
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:991656092f78eeab2a48fdbacf4e1f08567badaf
commit r11-6563-g991656092f78eeab2a48fdbacf4e1f08567badaf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94464
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89204
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[8/9/10 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
--- Comment #2 from Guillaume Piolat ---
It seems it is the same as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55752 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
--- Comment #4 from Guillaume Piolat ---
So, I need to disable inlining for _mm_setcsr and that will be enough?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
No. You need to put the code that is done with different rounding modes into
separate functions (and ensure those functions aren't inlined into their
caller).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
--- Comment #6 from Guillaume Piolat ---
I provide intel intrinsics API for D, these intrinsics (like in C++) allows to
change the rounding mode, and about 200 other functions that depend on the
rounding mode can be called. I'm not the one in con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
--- Comment #7 from Guillaume Piolat ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47617
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34678
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
--- Comment #7 from Jiangning Liu ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> On January 9, 2021 4:17:17 AM GMT+01:00, "jiangning.liu at amperecomputing
> dot com" wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98598
> >
> >---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98556
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0188eab844eacda5edc6257771edb771844ae069
commit r10-9242-g0188eab844eacda5edc6257771edb771844ae069
Author: Jakub Jelinek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] ICE:|[8/9 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82480
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #3)
> Actually, libgfortran already has a version of stat with integer(kind=int64)
> arguments. If you compile with -fdefault-integer-8 you get that one, and the
> ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98552
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Yes, I think that translating a DO loop into something like
int i;
for (i=0; i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98590
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Created attachment 49925
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49925&action=edit
ensure fileno_unlocked() is visible on Cygwin
Kludge to work around configure breakage. Not pretty, but at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
Bug ID: 98612
Summary: _mm_comieq_sd has wrong semantics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #1 from Guillaume Piolat ---
Illustration of the issue for _mm_comineq_sd
=> https://d.godbolt.org/z/zn51Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605
--- Comment #1 from Matheus Izvekov ---
By the way, FYII it is also possible to suppress clang-tidy specific
diagnostics on specific lines with a "comment pragma", like so (untested):
// NOLINT(bugprone-dangling-handle)
// NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugpron
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, that seems preferable, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98611
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98401
David Sicilia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dpsicilia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98607
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Guillaume Piolat from comment #6)
> I provide intel intrinsics API for D, these intrinsics (like in C++) allows
> to change the rounding mode, and about 200 other functions that depend on
> the rou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97093
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
Bug ID: 98613
Summary: vstring mov testsuite failures on AIX
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
These failures appeared with Martin Sebor's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98613
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98555
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98614
Bug ID: 98614
Summary: Copy ctor/assign cannot be defaulted in specialization
by concept
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
37 matches
Mail list logo
