https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.1 |11.0
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f448af69b208ba95496748c4596a22d11b1a09b9
commit r9-9148-gf448af69b208ba95496748c4596a22d11b1a09b9
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508
Bug ID: 98508
Summary: Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Since -9223372036854775808 is 0x8000 and ar3[0] == 1 it suggests
> that the offset is somewhere truncated to 32bits ... but I can't reproduce
> with a x86_64 to aarch64 cross and your reduced t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98509
Bug ID: 98509
Summary: BUGURL quotation problem in libcody
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510
Bug ID: 98510
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on
sparc64-linux-gnu, building the 32bit multilib
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #11 from Denis Yaroshevskiy
---
Previous 128bit contained a bug.
Here is an updated one: https://godbolt.org/z/6vdxro
There is still a bit of a difference between 2 versions, not sure if important.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508
--- Comment #2 from Joerg ---
Oh okay. Is it possible to prevent that from happening?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88767
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #13)
> Hi Richard，
>
> As checking the changed code as in comment 9, it seems there is another
> opportunity to improve the performance: By improving locality of array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 94246, which changed state.
Bug 94246 Summary: [9 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90
since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96782
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad64e807ffca93e927b68f1aa0cea54dacbe9afd
commit r11-6433-gad64e807ffca93e927b68f1aa0cea54dacbe9afd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96782, which changed state.
Bug 96782 Summary: Failure to optimize comparison with bitwise not-ed with self
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96782
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
>
> --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > Since -9223372036854775808 is 0x8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
--- Comment #45 from Mark Wielaard ---
Note that the hack in comment 43 doesn't really work with elfutils since the
.symver attribute doesn't work exactly like the assembly construct with @@@.
The @@@ symver variant see https://sourceware.org/bin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98291
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8837f82e4bab1b5405cf034eab9b3e83afc563ad
commit r11-6434-g8837f82e4bab1b5405cf034eab9b3e83afc563ad
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98291, which changed state.
Bug 98291 Summary: multiple scalar FP accumulators auto-vectorize worse than
scalar, including vector load + merge instead of scalar + high-half insert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98177
Przemyslaw Wirkus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98282
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
So the classification as VN_REFERENCE is wrong. We're doing
case tcc_reference:
/* VOP-less references can go through unary case. */
if ((code == REALPART_EXP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0926259f9fc21a7f1e09f45f8aede156ef249585
commit r11-6437-g0926259f9fc21a7f1e09f45f8aede156ef249585
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 98270 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 98270, which changed state.
Bug 98270 Summary: [11 Regression] UBSAN: /gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2396:16: runtime
error: load of value 112, which is not a valid value for type 'bool' since
r11-5928-gfc7b4248172561a9ee310e2d43d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90255
Alexander Goomenuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emerg.reanimator at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98288
--- Comment #2 from Matthieu M ---
Richard Smith (Clang) agreed that the following program should return 0, and
fixed the behavior in Clang (trunk) in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48517.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b41e6dd50f329b0291457e939d4c0dacd81c82c1
commit r11-6439-gb41e6dd50f329b0291457e939d4c0dacd81c82c1
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98282
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13b80a7d1b9b712651f5ece589634a6e57c26362
commit r11-6440-g13b80a7d1b9b712651f5ece589634a6e57c26362
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302
--- Comment #15 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> > which is miscompiled at -O2 -ftree-vectorize or -O3.
>
> What a great reduction, can you please share knowledge how did you achieve
> that?!
Hi Martin,
Sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
But this
sprime = eliminate_avail (gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (use)), use);
should make it more conservative (compared to the more desirable use of
gimple_bb (stmt) aka 'b').
The issue is really
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98282
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98511
Bug ID: 98511
Summary: [11 Regression]: Go build fails on sparc64 with
"error: reference to undefined name 'SYS_SETRESGID'"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL: https://bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98437
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthew Malcomson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f2b73175666f678adbf007907c7aa2661284bd3
commit r11-6441-g7f2b73175666f678adbf007907c7aa2661284bd3
Author: Matthew Malcomson
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] AArch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98455
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98511
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 98511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98459
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98472
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98475
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98500
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Summary|[11 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98511
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> dup
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98510 ***
Odd, I even searched for the error message before reporting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Hm, I've just tried that on x86_64-linux with:
../configure --disable-multilib --with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
--enable-languages=c,c++
and it's fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98437
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39bd65faee3bafe2dc067e5fedb5079896551a8a
commit r11-6442-g39bd65faee3bafe2dc067e5fedb5079896551a8a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> But this
>
> sprime = eliminate_avail (gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (use)), use);
>
> should make it more conservative (compared to the more desirable use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96930
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95771
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24cd9afe617a39801d190418cf3fbab3bc3742a7
commit r11-6443-g24cd9afe617a39801d190418cf3fbab3bc3742a7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
>
> --- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98308
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e79d76a16c56df0f838b9aede69c0a158203f56
commit r11-6444-g9e79d76a16c56df0f838b9aede69c0a158203f56
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95771
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed now, except that for __uint128_t we aren't able to optimize
away the conditional in if (x) return __builtin_popcountll (x >> 64) +
__builtin_popcountll (x); else return 0; - the phiopt popcoun
emchr (s, c, (unsigned long)-1);
|^~~~~~
Seen with: 11.0.0 20210104 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9)
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
> >
> > --- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
> > (In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98257
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There's also 'A New Algorithm for Identifying Loops in Decompilation' by
Tao Wei, Jian Mao, Wei Zou and You Chen of the Institute of Computer Science
and Technology of the Peking University with similar comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc, openmp
--- Comment #1 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98259
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc-10 has significantly|[10/11 Regression] gcc-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|10.2.1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98369
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:101873f243237de4d868af95b89120a48cf86f6e
commit r9-9149-g101873f243237de4d868af95b89120a48cf86f6e
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96928
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96707
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> I think another case for ranger symbolic ranges?
indeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> trunk has FRE before late DOM possibly hiding the issue - you can try
> -fdisable-tree-fre4
I don't see the ICE on trunk with that option, FWIW. I wonder if a bis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96697
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Shall we do that as a specific matcher or e.g. in the ranger once it gets
> code for symbolic comparisons? I mean, for signed t = x % y note that t is
> in [-y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98287
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We need to guard the patterns. Handling V1 modes in the expanders is possible
but it doesn't fix the root cause (there's also vector-by-scalar shifts).
Maybe we should define/document a set of arithmetics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
--- Comment #27 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 49875
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49875&action=edit
Fix for the cases in comments 23 and 24
Hi Damian,
Happy New Year! or I wish you a better one anyway.
I ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513
Bug ID: 98513
Summary: [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since
r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.3.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98300
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98310
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98318
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Summary|libcody breaks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98326
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98329
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
